# Openfort vs Privy Wallets (server wallets, agent wallets, policy engine) (slim)

> Openfort and Privy Wallets score within a point of each other for onchain wallets, 70.1 and 69.9 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openfort-vs-privy.md (~2,450 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openfort-vs-privy.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openfort-vs-privy
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

Openfort and Privy Wallets (server wallets, agent wallets, policy engine) score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 70.1 (BB) and 69.9 (B). Privy Wallets (server wallets, agent wallets, policy engine) leads on agent ergonomics and security & auth. Both do onchain wallets.

- Openfort: BB 70.1, rank #163 of 950 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/openfort.min.md
- Privy Wallets (server wallets, agent wallets, policy engine): B 69.9, rank #166 of 950 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/privy.min.md
- Openfort, good for A team that wants server-held wallets for agents on EVM chains and Solana with enclave signing, a free start and a CLI an agent can drive. Ahead on Reliability, 88 against 48; Schema & documentation, 89 against 83; Payments & pricing, 60 against 55; Maintenance & community, 87 against 80. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better; Runs on your own machine.
- Privy Wallets (server wallets, agent wallets, policy engine), good for Builders who need fine-grained, enclave-enforced spending rules on programmatic wallets, or who want an agent to sign for a person's wallet with a revocable scoped signer. Ahead on Agent ergonomics, 73 against 65; Security & auth, 85 against 65. Also No incidents deducted, where Openfort loses 5 points for them.

| Category | Openfort | Privy Wallets (server wallets, agent wallets, policy engine) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 88 | 48 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 89 | 83 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 65 | 73 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 65 | 85 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 55 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 87 | 80 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 69 | 71 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Openfort | Privy Wallets (server wallets, agent wallets, policy engine) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Openfort (Alamas Labs Inc.) | Privy (Stripe) |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.openfort.io` | `https://api.privy.io/v1` |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Licence | Proprietary service under the Openfort Developer Terms of Service. The Node SDK and OpenSigner are MIT. The CLI repository and package state no licence | none |
| Terms last updated | 2026-01-16 | 2025-12-16 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-04 | no date given |
| Popularity | 10 stars, 7.6k npm/wk | 296k npm/wk, 13k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.5/5 (2) |