# OpenDuet vs ZeroClaw (slim)

> ZeroClaw scores 70.6 (BB) to OpenDuet's 49.5 (D) for proactive personal assistants. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openduet-vs-zeroclaw.md (~3,950 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openduet-vs-zeroclaw.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openduet-vs-zeroclaw
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-30
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

ZeroClaw scores 70.6 (BB) on agent readiness against OpenDuet's 49.5 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do proactive personal assistants.

- OpenDuet: D 49.5, rank #962 of 1239 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/openduet.min.md
- ZeroClaw: BB 70.6, rank #168 of 1239 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/zeroclaw.min.md
- OpenDuet, good for A starting point for a developer or team who wants a proactive mail-and-calendar assistant they host and change, with approvals and audit, and who accepts a CopilotKit Intelligence account. Also No incidents deducted, where ZeroClaw loses 3 points for them.
- ZeroClaw, good for One person who wants an assistant on their own hardware that answers on Telegram, Discord, Matrix or email, asks before it writes or runs commands, and works with a local model. Ahead on Reliability, 74 against 42; Schema & documentation, 82 against 58; Agent ergonomics, 72 against 52; Security & auth, 76 against 59; Payments & pricing, 60 against 30; Maintenance & community, 80 against 37. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better; No key needed to call it.

| Category | OpenDuet | ZeroClaw |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 42 | 74 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 58 | 82 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 52 | 72 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 59 | 76 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 60 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 37 | 80 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 68 | 68 |

| Fact (where they differ) | OpenDuet | ZeroClaw |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | CopilotKit (Tawkit, Inc.) | ZeroClaw Labs |
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Licence | MIT. Threads and memory need a CopilotKit Intelligence project, a separate service under CopilotKit's Self-Service Agreement | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | none | 2026-09-05 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-08-27 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read |  |
| Popularity | 1.6k stars | 33k stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.3/5 (4) |