# OpenCage Geocoding API vs TomTom Maps APIs + MCP (slim)

> OpenCage Geocoding API has a score of 69.5 (B) against TomTom Maps APIs + MCP's 55.1 (C). Both do geo geocode. The largest gap is reliability, 55 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencage-vs-tomtom.md (~1,500 tokens) · this version ~380 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencage-vs-tomtom.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencage-vs-tomtom
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

OpenCage Geocoding API has a score of 69.5 (B) against TomTom Maps APIs + MCP's 55.1 (C). Both do geo geocode. The largest gap is reliability, 55 points.

- OpenCage Geocoding API: B 69.5, rank #113 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/opencage.min.md
- TomTom Maps APIs + MCP: C 55.1, rank #318 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/tomtom.min.md
- Pick OpenCage Geocoding API for reliability (+55), schema & documentation (+6), agent ergonomics (+8), payments & pricing (+10), transparency & trust (+26). Pick TomTom Maps APIs + MCP for maintenance & community (+20).

| Category | OpenCage Geocoding API | TomTom Maps APIs + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 85 | 30 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 77 | 71 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 86 | 78 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 47 | 51 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 35 | 25 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 66 | 86 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 87 | 61 |