# Open WebUI vs screenpipe (slim)

> screenpipe has a score of 61.1 (C) against Open WebUI's 52 (D). Both do local inference. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 21 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/open-webui-vs-screenpipe.md (~2,000 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/open-webui-vs-screenpipe.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/open-webui-vs-screenpipe
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

screenpipe has a score of 61.1 (C) against Open WebUI's 52 (D). Both do local inference. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 21 points.

- Open WebUI: D 52, rank #345 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/open-webui.min.md
- screenpipe: C 61.1, rank #233 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/screenpipe.min.md
- Pick Open WebUI for security & auth (+15), maintenance & community (+9). Pick screenpipe for schema & documentation (+21), agent ergonomics (+21), payments & pricing (+10).

| Category | Open WebUI | screenpipe |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 68 | 65 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 60 | 81 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 54 | 75 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 63 | 48 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 20 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 91 | 82 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 73 | 73 |