# Onyx vs Procore AI Go (slim)

> Onyx scores 65 (B) to Procore AI Go's 24.4 (F) for company knowledge search. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/onyx-vs-procore-ai-go.md (~2,450 tokens) · this version ~830 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/onyx-vs-procore-ai-go.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/onyx-vs-procore-ai-go
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Onyx scores 65 (B) on agent readiness against Procore AI Go's 24.4 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do company knowledge search.

- Onyx: B 65, rank #375 of 1197 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/onyx.min.md
- Procore AI Go: F 24.4, rank #1133 of 1197 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/procore-ai-go.min.md
- Onyx, good for Teams that want one permission-aware index over Slack, Drive, Confluence, Jira, GitHub and the rest, self-hosted or air-gapped, with agents searching it through MCP. Ahead on Reliability, 69 against 40; Schema & documentation, 88 against 9; Agent ergonomics, 77 against 5; Security & auth, 71 against 39; Payments & pricing, 30 against 0; Maintenance & community, 77 against 35; Transparency & trust, 63 against 48. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install; Free to start without a card; Open source; Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 1.8 out of 5.
- Procore AI Go, good for Field crews already on Procore with a Digital Coworker package who want spoken answers from project records on site. Also No incidents deducted, where Onyx loses 4 points for them.

| Category | Onyx | Procore AI Go |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 69 | 40 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 88 | 9 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 77 | 5 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 71 | 39 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 0 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 77 | 35 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 63 | 48 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Onyx | Procore AI Go |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | DanswerAI, Inc. (Onyx, formerly Danswer) | Procore Technologies, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://cloud.onyx.app/mcp` | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |  |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Licence | MIT (Community Edition, including the MCP server, the API server, the CLI and the connectors). Code under the `ee` directories is under the Onyx Enterprise License, which needs a subscription for production use | Proprietary service under Procore's subscription terms and its AI Terms for its generative AI tools (www.procore.com/legal). Both pages draw their text by script and weren't read. No open-source code or published package was found |
| Tools exposed | 3 | none |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-02 | 2026-10-21 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read |  |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read |  |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read |  |
| Popularity | 32k stars | none |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 1.8/5 (4) |