# OneSignal vs Pingram (slim)

> OneSignal scores 69.3 (B) to Pingram's 57.4 (C) for push notifications. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/onesignal-vs-pingram.md (~2,200 tokens) · this version ~630 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/onesignal-vs-pingram.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/onesignal-vs-pingram
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

OneSignal scores 69.3 (B) on agent readiness against Pingram's 57.4 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Pingram leads on payments & pricing. Both do push notifications.

- OneSignal: B 69.3, rank #189 of 950 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/onesignal.min.md
- Pingram: C 57.4, rank #611 of 950 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/pingram.min.md
- OneSignal, good for A team whose main channel is push to its own mobile or web app and who wants delivery handled without a separate push provider. Ahead on Reliability, 70 against 58; Schema & documentation, 87 against 69; Security & auth, 74 against 51; Transparency & trust, 72 against 54.
- Pingram, good for An agent that needs to send transactional email and SMS and read replies through one account without separate carrier or SMTP providers. Ahead on Payments & pricing, 40 against 35.

| Category | OneSignal | Pingram |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 70 | 58 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 87 | 69 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 64 | 67 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 74 | 51 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 35 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 81 | 81 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 72 | 54 |

| Fact (where they differ) | OneSignal | Pingram |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | OneSignal | Pingram |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.onesignal.com` | `https://mcp.pingram.io` |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Licence | Modified MIT (Node SDK, use limited to OneSignal's services) | Proprietary service under Pingram's terms of service. The Node.js SDK and CLI are MIT on npm. The Go SDK repository has no licence file |
| Tools exposed | 43 | none |
| MCP registry | not listed | `io.pingram/mcp` |
| Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-10-08 |
| Terms last updated | 2024-06-12 | 2025-04-16 |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | 2025-04-16 |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 52 stars, 231k npm/wk, 28k PyPI/wk | 1 stars, 13k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | none |