# Olostep vs Scrapeless > Olostep has a score of 63.1 (B) against Scrapeless's 54.3 (C). Both do scraping. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 37 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/olostep-vs-scrapeless - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/olostep-vs-scrapeless.md (~1,700 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/olostep-vs-scrapeless.min.md (~330 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/olostep-vs-scrapeless.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-05 Olostep has a score of 63.1 (B) against Scrapeless's 54.3 (C). Both do scraping. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 37 points. - Olostep: grade B, 63.1/100, rank #210 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/olostep.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/olostep.json - Scrapeless: grade C, 54.3/100, rank #326 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/scrapeless.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/scrapeless.json ## Which one, for what Pick Olostep for schema & documentation (+18), agent ergonomics (+37), payments & pricing (+30). Pick Scrapeless for reliability (+15), security & auth (+7), maintenance & community (+23). ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Olostep | Scrapeless | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 60 | 75 | Scrapeless +15 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 84 | 66 | Olostep +18 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 87 | 50 | Olostep +37 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 28 | 35 | Scrapeless +7 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 65 | 35 | Olostep +30 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 58 | 81 | Scrapeless +23 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 60 | 56 | Olostep +4 | | Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | | | **Total** | | **63.1 · B** | **54.3 · C** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Olostep | Scrapeless | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | Olostep Technologies, Inc. | Scrapeless (NST Labs Tech) | | Hosted endpoint | `https://api.olostep.com` | `https://api.scrapeless.com` | | Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | | Auth | API key | API key | | Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use | | x402 | payer tooling only | no | | Licence | MIT | MIT | | Tools exposed | 11 | 25 | | Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a | | p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | yes | yes | | MCP registry | `io.github.olostep/olostep-mcp-server` | `io.github.scrapeless-ai/scrapeless-mcp-server` | | Last release | 2026-07-15 | 2026-09-16 | | Popularity | 24 stars, 8.9k npm/wk, 2k PyPI/wk | 169 stars, 423 npm/wk, 216 PyPI/wk | | Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 2/5 (2) | ## Verdicts **Olostep.** OpenAPI 3.0.3 for every endpoint and a structured error body. The x402 challenge came back with no payment requirements in our probe. **Scrapeless.** Hosted streamable HTTP MCP at api.scrapeless.com/mcp with header auth, plus a stdio package, both in the official MCP registry. llms.txt quotes Deep SerpApi at $0.1 per 1,000 while the plan data charges $1 per 1,000 for Google Search. ## Before you call either ### Olostep 1. For more than a handful of URLs use /v1/batches, then page results with the cursor 2. Pass `storage.expires_in` if you need results after about 7 days 3. Don't ask for json output without a `parser` or an `llm_extract` schema 4. Hosted MCP wants `Authorization: Bearer`, stdio wants OLOSTEP_API_KEY. Mixing them up shows 0 tools 5. Check the 402 body before paying over x402. Our probe got an empty one ### Scrapeless 1. Use scrape_markdown for reading pages and save the browser_* tools for clicks and logins, since browser time bills by the hour 2. Call browser_close when done so the session and its billing stop 3. Set limit on crawl_start. Unset, it defaults to 10,000 pages 4. Crawls are asynchronous. Call crawl_start, then poll crawl_result with the returned id 5. Set SCRAPELESS_API_KEY for the stdio server. Older guides use SCRAPELESS_KEY, which still works as a fallback ## Other comparisons with Olostep or Scrapeless - [Bright Data vs Olostep](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bright-data-vs-olostep.md) - [Bright Data vs Scrapeless](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bright-data-vs-scrapeless.md) - [Jina Reader vs Olostep](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-olostep.md) - [Jina Reader vs Scrapeless](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jina-reader-vs-scrapeless.md) - [Olostep vs Scrape.do](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/olostep-vs-scrape-do.md) - [Olostep vs ScrapeGraphAI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/olostep-vs-scrapegraphai.md) - [Olostep vs Scrapfly](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/olostep-vs-scrapfly.md) - [Olostep vs ScrapingAnt](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/olostep-vs-scrapingant.md) - [Olostep vs ScrapingBee](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/olostep-vs-scrapingbee.md) - [Olostep vs Scrapingdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/olostep-vs-scrapingdog.md) - [Olostep vs Spider](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/olostep-vs-spider-cloud.md) - [Olostep vs ZenRows](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/olostep-vs-zenrows.md) - [Scrape.do vs Scrapeless](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrape-do-vs-scrapeless.md) - [ScrapeGraphAI vs Scrapeless](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapegraphai-vs-scrapeless.md) - [Scrapeless vs Scrapfly](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapeless-vs-scrapfly.md) - [Scrapeless vs ScrapingAnt](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapeless-vs-scrapingant.md) - [Scrapeless vs ScrapingBee](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapeless-vs-scrapingbee.md) - [Scrapeless vs Scrapingdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapeless-vs-scrapingdog.md) - [Scrapeless vs Spider](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapeless-vs-spider-cloud.md) - [Scrapeless vs ZenRows](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scrapeless-vs-zenrows.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs Olostep](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-olostep.md) - [Firecrawl MCP vs Scrapeless](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapeless.md) - [Apify MCP Server vs Olostep](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apify-mcp-vs-olostep.md) - [Apify MCP Server vs Scrapeless](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apify-mcp-vs-scrapeless.md)