# Ollama vs Underdog (slim)

> Ollama has a score of 56.6 (C) against Underdog's 29.9 (F). Both do inference open weights. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 60 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ollama-vs-underdog.md (~1,850 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ollama-vs-underdog.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ollama-vs-underdog
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-04

Ollama has a score of 56.6 (C) against Underdog's 29.9 (F). Both do inference open weights. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 60 points.

- Ollama: C 56.6, rank #302 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ollama.min.md
- Underdog: F 29.9, rank #444 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/underdog.min.md
- Pick Ollama for reliability (+20), schema & documentation (+55), agent ergonomics (+60), security & auth (+14), maintenance & community (+25), transparency & trust (+39). Pick Underdog for nothing in particular.

| Category | Ollama | Underdog |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 53 | 33 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 79 | 24 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 75 | 15 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 28 | 14 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 60 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 81 | 56 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 63 | 24 |