# occamy-1.0 vs Step 3.7 Flash (slim)

> occamy-1.0 scores 61 (C) to Step 3.7 Flash's 59.8 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/occamy-1-0-vs-step-3-7-flash.md (~9,250 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/occamy-1-0-vs-step-3-7-flash.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/occamy-1-0-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

occamy-1.0 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Step 3.7 Flash's 59.8 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Step 3.7 Flash leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- occamy-1.0: C 61, rank #59 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/occamy-1-0.min.md
- Step 3.7 Flash: C 59.8, rank #93 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/step-3-7-flash.min.md
- occamy-1.0, good for Agents that want an Apache 2.0 mixture-of-experts model tuned for long tool-using tasks on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac. Ahead on Reach, 90 against 70; Risk, 55 against 45; Documentation and upkeep, 74 against 39.
- Step 3.7 Flash, good for Teams with a GPU server or a provider account that want an open, long-context agent model with vision Ahead on Agent interface, 85 against 70.

| Category | occamy-1.0 | Step 3.7 Flash |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 90 | 70 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 45 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 70 | 85 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 74 | 39 |

| Fact (where they differ) | occamy-1.0 | Step 3.7 Flash |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Accio (Accio-Lab) | StepFun |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 (metadata and card; no LICENSE file) |
| Last release | 2026-10-02 | 2026-06-03 |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | none |

Why the edge:
- Documentation and upkeep, occamy-1.0 +35: occamy-1.0 74 (Model card 14 of 20, languages and a knowledge cut-off are missing.); Step 3.7 Flash 39 (Model card 14, Intended use, the architecture, the parameters, the context and the language (in the metadata) are on the card.)
- Reach, occamy-1.0 +20: occamy-1.0 90 (Memory 25 of 30, Accio's MLX mxfp4 build is 18.4 GB, 22.1 GB with a fifth added, and its IQ4_XS GGUF needs 22.5 GB, both within 24 GB.); Step 3.7 Flash 70 (Memory 5, the smallest build at 4 bits is StepFun's IQ4_XS GGUF, 104.99 GB with the 3.97 GB projector, and 108.96 GB × 1.2 = 130.8 GB, over what the reference m…)
- Agent interface, Step 3.7 Flash +15: occamy-1.0 70 (Chat template 20, the base's Jinja template in the repository.); Step 3.7 Flash 85 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (5,723 characters).)
- Risk, occamy-1.0 +10: occamy-1.0 55 (File safety 25, safetensors only and nothing from the repository runs to load it or build prompts.); Step 3.7 Flash 45 (File safety 15, safetensors and GGUF only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25).)