# occamy-1.0 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview (slim)

> occamy-1.0 scores 61 (C) to SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview's 46.8 (D) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/occamy-1-0-vs-sensenova-loop-9b-preview.md (~9,750 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/occamy-1-0-vs-sensenova-loop-9b-preview.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/occamy-1-0-vs-sensenova-loop-9b-preview
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

occamy-1.0 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview's 46.8 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- occamy-1.0: C 61, rank #59 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/occamy-1-0.min.md
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview: D 46.8, rank #155 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/sensenova-loop-9b-preview.min.md
- occamy-1.0, good for Agents that want an Apache 2.0 mixture-of-experts model tuned for long tool-using tasks on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac. Ahead on Reach, 90 against 40; Risk, 55 against 50; Agent interface, 70 against 60; Documentation and upkeep, 74 against 44.
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview, good for Researchers who want to study or fine-tune a looped transformer, more than agents that need a model to call today

| Category | occamy-1.0 | SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 90 | 40 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 50 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 70 | 60 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 74 | 44 |

| Fact (where they differ) | occamy-1.0 | SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Accio (Accio-Lab) | SenseTime (SenseNova) |
| Last release | 2026-10-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | not read yet |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | none |

Why the edge:
- Reach, occamy-1.0 +50: occamy-1.0 90 (Memory 25 of 30, Accio's MLX mxfp4 build is 18.4 GB, 22.1 GB with a fifth added, and its IQ4_XS GGUF needs 22.5 GB, both within 24 GB.); SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview 40 (Memory 15, the only build is the safetensors set, 38.14 GB with its MTP head, since the Hub counts 9.41B of its parameters in F32. Runtimes 0, none of the six r…)
- Documentation and upkeep, occamy-1.0 +30: occamy-1.0 74 (Model card 14 of 20, languages and a knowledge cut-off are missing.); SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview 44 (Model card 14, Intended use, the architecture, the parameter counts, the training context and the languages (in the metadata) are on the card.)
- Agent interface, occamy-1.0 +10: occamy-1.0 70 (Chat template 20, the base's Jinja template in the repository.); SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview 60 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (7,756 characters).)
- Risk, occamy-1.0 +5: occamy-1.0 55 (File safety 25, safetensors only and nothing from the repository runs to load it or build prompts.); SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview 50 (File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25).)