# occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-9B (slim)

> occamy-1.0 and Qwen3.5-9B score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 61 and 60.5 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/occamy-1-0-vs-qwen3-5-9b.md (~5,700 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/occamy-1-0-vs-qwen3-5-9b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/occamy-1-0-vs-qwen3-5-9b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

occamy-1.0 and Qwen3.5-9B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 60.5 (C). Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- occamy-1.0: C 61, rank #51 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/occamy-1-0.min.md
- Qwen3.5-9B: C 60.5, rank #53 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/qwen3-5-9b.min.md
- occamy-1.0, good for Agents that want an Apache 2.0 mixture-of-experts model tuned for long tool-using tasks on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac. Ahead on Documentation and upkeep, 74 against 34. Also Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.5 out of 5.
- Qwen3.5-9B, good for Agents that want a small multimodal tool-calling cousin on a laptop or a 16 GB GPU, under a plain licence

| Category | occamy-1.0 | Qwen3.5-9B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 85 | 85 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 70 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 74 | 34 |

| Fact (where they differ) | occamy-1.0 | Qwen3.5-9B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Accio (Accio-Lab) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Last release | 2026-10-02 | 2026-03-02 |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 2.5/5 (4) |