# occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-2B (slim)

> occamy-1.0 scores 61 (C) to Qwen3.5-2B's 50.5 (D) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/occamy-1-0-vs-qwen3-5-2b.md (~5,700 tokens) · this version ~380 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/occamy-1-0-vs-qwen3-5-2b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/occamy-1-0-vs-qwen3-5-2b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

occamy-1.0 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Qwen3.5-2B's 50.5 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- occamy-1.0: C 61, rank #51 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/occamy-1-0.min.md
- Qwen3.5-2B: D 50.5, rank #92 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/qwen3-5-2b.min.md
- occamy-1.0, good for Agents that want an Apache 2.0 mixture-of-experts model tuned for long tool-using tasks on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac. Ahead on Reach, 85 against 80; Agent interface, 70 against 60; Documentation and upkeep, 74 against 37.
- Qwen3.5-2B, good for Builders who want a cheap local helper or fine-tuning base for narrow tasks and image reading on a laptop, small GPU or CPU

| Category | occamy-1.0 | Qwen3.5-2B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 85 | 80 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 70 | 60 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 74 | 37 |

| Fact (where they differ) | occamy-1.0 | Qwen3.5-2B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Accio (Accio-Lab) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Last release | 2026-10-02 | 2026-03-02 |