{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "new-relic", "name": "New Relic MCP Server", "vendor": "New Relic, Inc.", "vendorUrl": "https://newrelic.com", "kind": "mcp", "category": "observability", "summary": "New Relic's hosted MCP server at mcp.newrelic.com gives AI agents read access to an account's entities, NRQL data, alerts, issues, logs, errors, traces and deployments, with OAuth or a user API key, on top of the NerdGraph API.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/new-relic", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/new-relic.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/new-relic.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/new-relic.json", "dns": "new-relic.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/newrelic/nr-skills-hub", "transports": [ "streamable-http" ], "remoteUrl": "https://mcp.newrelic.com/mcp/", "packages": [], "auth": "oauth", "authNotes": "OAuth 2.0 (recommended) with scopes `observability:read`, `offline` and `offline_access`; access tokens expire after 5 minutes and are refreshed, with sign-in again after 24 hours. Or a user API key (`NRAK-...`) in an `api-key` header, which the docs say only works where stated and excludes the AI analysis, gap and preview tools. An administrator must leave the MCP toggles on in feature control manager and the user needs an organisation-scoped read role. EU and JP accounts use mcp.eu.newrelic.com and mcp.jp.newrelic.com.", "pricing": "freemium", "pricingNotes": "MCP is available on every New Relic account, including the free tier (100 GB of ingest a month, one full platform user, no card). Most tools are metered as Core Compute Units against the account's allocation and four AI analysis tools as Advanced Compute Units; no per-call price is published. Data beyond 100 GB costs $0.40 per GB; user and edition prices are quoted on request (https://newrelic.com/pricing).", "priceSummary": "$0.40 / GB", "where": "hosted", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the MCP docs, pricing page or terms (checked 2026-11-03). MCP calls are metered as compute units on the account's bill.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 40, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://docs.newrelic.com/docs/agentic-ai/mcp/overview/", "llmsTxt": "https://docs.newrelic.com/llms.txt", "registryName": "com.newrelic/mcp-server", "capabilities": [ "observability.metrics", "observability.logs", "observability.errors", "observability.traces", "observability.incidents" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "freemium", "free-tier", "no-card", "mcp", "remote-mcp", "mcp-registry", "oauth", "read-only-mode", "llms-txt", "status-page", "security-txt", "bug-bounty", "soc2", "eu-region", "closed-source" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-28", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 61, "grade": "C", "agentReady": false, "rank": 567, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 5, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 59, "maintenance": 80, "payments": 30, "reliability": 60, "schema": 51, "security": 76, "transparency": 81 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-03" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "OAuth with a read scope, 5-minute access tokens, role-bound calls and a queryable audit trail make this a safe read surface over an account's data, and the free tier includes it. 40 tools need tag filtering, the schemas aren't public, there is no per-call price, and no dated GA notice was found.", "bestFor": "Agents investigating incidents, errors, deployments and performance in an existing New Relic account, where reads are enough.", "strengths": [ "OAuth 2.0 with `observability:read`, access tokens that expire after 5 minutes, revocation by user or organisation toggle, and every call bound to the user's roles", "`include-tags` header limits the 40 tools to the groups a task needs, such as `discovery,alerting`", "Sign-ins and NRQL sent through the server are queryable in NrAuditEvent and NrdbQuery with a product label", "Available on the free tier (100 GB a month, no card) and rate-limited at a published 2,000 tool calls an hour per user", "llms.txt and Markdown twins of every docs page, a dated what's-new feed and a verified registry namespace" ], "weaknesses": [ "Tool input schemas are visible only through an authenticated session; the docs give one-line descriptions and no parameters", "40 tools in the default list, above the 30-tool line, unless the client sends `include-tags`", "No per-call price; tools are metered as Core and Advanced Compute Units on the account's bill", "Public preview since 4 November 2025 with no dated general availability notice found, and preview tools mixed into the list", "Logs, errors and traces come back as untrusted text with no prompt-injection guidance; the trust centre renders through a script our reader can't run" ], "agentNotes": [ "Connect with OAuth; an `api-key` header reaches only the core tools and the docs say the API key route works only where stated", "Send `include-tags` with the groups the task needs (for example `discovery,data-access`) to keep the tool list under 30", "Call `list_available_new_relic_accounts` first and pass the account id to every query; `convert_time_period_to_epoch_ms` turns phrases such as last 30 minutes into the epoch bounds the other tools take", "Stay under 2,000 tool calls an hour per user and 25 concurrent NerdGraph requests; a 429 clears as in-flight requests finish", "Ask the organisation administrator to turn on the Preview Tools, API Keys, Atlassian or AWS toggles in feature control manager before relying on those tools; they are off by default" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "C", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 61 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 59, "maintenance": 80, "payments": 30, "reliability": 60, "schema": 51, "security": 76, "transparency": 63 }, "provenanceScore": 98, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-03", "maintenance": "2026-11-03", "payments": "2026-11-03", "reliability": "2026-11-03", "schema": "2026-11-03", "security": "2026-11-03", "transparency": "2026-11-03" }, "last": "2026-11-03", "oldest": "2026-11-03", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "claudeCode": "claude mcp add --transport http --scope user newrelic https://mcp.newrelic.com/mcp/", "config": { "mcpServers": { "newrelic": { "type": "http", "url": "https://mcp.newrelic.com/mcp/" } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/observability.metrics", "tool": "https://letme.dev/new-relic" }, "area": "developer", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Data ingest beyond 100 GB a month", "unit": "gb", "usd": 0.4, "note": "100 GB a month free on every edition. User and compute prices are quoted on request" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "New Relic, Inc.", "domain": "newrelic.com", "domainRegistered": "2006-04-19", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://newrelic.com/termsandconditions/paid", "privacy": "https://newrelic.com/termsandconditions/privacy", "statusPage": "https://status.newrelic.com", "changelog": "https://docs.newrelic.com/whats-new/", "securityTxt": "valid", "checked": "2026-11-03", "notes": [ "The paid terms of service are dated 8 November 2022 and the unpaid terms 21 October 2021; the master cloud agreement path is disallowed by newrelic.com/robots.txt and wasn't read. The privacy notice is dated 14 September 2026.", "newrelic.com/robots.txt disallows /signup/, /lp/, the master cloud agreement and a few files; /security redirected to trust.newrelic.com, which renders through a script and was not readable. docs.newrelic.com allows everything.", "security.txt at newrelic.com/.well-known/security.txt points to HackerOne for contact and policy.", "status.newrelic.com is an Atlassian Statuspage with 115 components across US, EU and JP; the history page needs JavaScript, so the 90-day record was read from history.rss, which holds 25 incidents back to 12 January 2026.", "RDAP gives newrelic.com a registration date of 19 April 2006. firstReleased is 4 November 2025, the public preview date of the MCP server." ], "score": 98 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/new-relic.json", "live": { "slug": "new-relic", "probe": { "target": "https://mcp.newrelic.com/mcp/", "method": "mcp-initialize", "lastAt": "2026-11-04T21:39:36.212939859Z", "lastOk": true, "lastStatus": 401, "lastMs": 302, "lastNote": "asks for credentials", "authRequired": true, "uptime24h": 100, "uptime30d": 100, "p50ms24h": 327, "p95ms24h": 416, "samples24h": 64, "samples30d": 64, "days": [ { "date": "2026-11-04", "probes": 64, "ok": 64 } ] }, "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://status.newrelic.com", "indicator": "none", "summary": "All Systems Operational", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T21:38:31.653792842Z" }, "versions": [ { "registry": "mcp-registry", "name": "com.newrelic/mcp-server", "version": "0.1.0", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T17:11:44.552009456Z" } ], "githubStars": 7, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://newrelic.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "valid", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:54:45.364182842Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T21:39:36.212939859Z" } }, "answer": "New Relic MCP Server scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against PagerDuty MCP Server's 48.6 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.", "b": { "slug": "pagerduty-mcp", "name": "PagerDuty MCP Server", "vendor": "PagerDuty", "vendorUrl": "https://support.pagerduty.com/main/docs/pagerduty-mcp-server", "kind": "mcp", "category": "observability", "summary": "PagerDuty's hosted MCP server at mcp.pagerduty.com (EU at mcp.eu.pagerduty.com) for incidents, services, schedules, on-call, escalation policies, alerts and analytics, with OAuth or API-key auth.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/pagerduty-mcp", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/pagerduty-mcp.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/pagerduty-mcp.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/pagerduty-mcp.json", "dns": "pagerduty-mcp.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/PagerDuty/pagerduty-mcp-server", "license": "Apache-2.0", "transports": [ "streamable-http" ], "remoteUrl": "https://mcp.pagerduty.com/mcp", "packages": [], "auth": "mixed", "authNotes": "OAuth with metadata discovery using static client credentials (no dynamic client registration), an OAuth bearer token such as a client-credentials app token, or an API key in `Authorization: Token token=\u003ckey\u003e`. Scoped OAuth apps use per-resource scopes and require PKCE. Some tools and filters need user-level rather than account-level auth. EU accounts use mcp.eu.pagerduty.com.", "pricing": "byo-plan", "pricingNotes": "No separate charge stated. The MCP docs list a PagerDuty account with Advanced Permissions as a prerequisite, and the pricing page includes Advanced Permissions in the PD Reliability Platform tiers (Starter $2,800 a year, Essential $12,000, Plus $48,000). Incident Management Free (5 users) and Professional ($21 per user a month billed yearly, $25 monthly) are also public. Whether the free plan can use MCP isn't stated (https://www.pagerduty.com/pricing/incident-management/).", "priceSummary": "Your plan", "where": "hosted", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No payments. Access follows the PagerDuty account.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-09-26" }, "docsUrl": "https://docs.pagerduty.com/ai-automation/advance/pagerduty-mcp-server", "capabilities": [ "observability.incidents", "work.oncall" ], "tags": [ "official", "hosted", "oauth", "incidents", "enterprise" ], "lastRelease": "2026-09-04", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 48.6, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 1028, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 10, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 49, "maintenance": 32, "payments": 10, "reliability": 52, "schema": 55, "security": 66, "transparency": 65 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-10-01" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Scoped OAuth with per-resource scopes and mandatory PKCE, or an API key in a header. No read-only mode on the hosted server, where the local one was read-only by default.", "bestFor": "Incident and on-call agents in PagerDuty shops.", "strengths": [ "Scoped OAuth with per-resource scopes and mandatory PKCE, or an API key in a header", "US and EU endpoints documented", "REST limits published at 960 requests a minute with ratelimit-reset headers", "SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and FedRAMP Low", "The local server was archived with a pointer to the hosted one" ], "weaknesses": [ "No read-only mode on the hosted server, where the local one was read-only by default", "Hosted tool list, schemas and changelog aren't published", "No native tool filtering, so the full list loads whatever the OAuth scopes allow", "Advanced Permissions, a Reliability Platform feature from $2,800 a year, is listed as a prerequisite", "The official registry entry still points at the archived 0.2.1 package" ], "agentNotes": [ "Use a scoped OAuth client with read scopes only if the agent shouldn't acknowledge, resolve or edit anything", "Use a user API key or user OAuth for `assigned` or `teams` filters. Account-level keys fail those calls", "Pass `limit` and a `since` date on incident lists. The default limit is 1,000 records", "EU accounts must use mcp.eu.pagerduty.com", "On 429, wait `ratelimit-reset` seconds. There's no Retry-After header" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 2, "avgRating": 1.5, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 48.6 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 49, "maintenance": 32, "payments": 10, "reliability": 52, "schema": 55, "security": 66, "transparency": 48 }, "provenanceScore": 81, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-10-01", "maintenance": "2026-10-01", "payments": "2026-10-01", "reliability": "2026-10-01", "schema": "2026-10-01", "security": "2026-10-01", "transparency": "2026-10-01" }, "last": "2026-10-01", "lastMoved": "2026-10-27", "oldest": "2026-10-01", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "claudeCode": "claude mcp add --transport http pagerduty https://mcp.pagerduty.com/mcp", "config": { "mcpServers": { "pagerduty": { "url": "https://mcp.pagerduty.com/mcp" } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/observability.incidents", "tool": "https://letme.dev/pagerduty-mcp" }, "area": "developer", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "PagerDuty, Inc.", "domain": "pagerduty.com", "domainRegistered": "2009-02-12", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.pagerduty.com/terms-of-service/", "privacy": "https://www.pagerduty.com/privacy-policy/", "statusPage": "https://status.pagerduty.com", "changelog": "", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-09-26", "score": 81 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/pagerduty-mcp.json", "live": { "slug": "pagerduty-mcp", "probe": { "target": "https://mcp.pagerduty.com/mcp", "method": "mcp-initialize", "lastAt": "2026-11-04T21:39:39.090893717Z", "lastOk": true, "lastStatus": 401, "lastMs": 615, "lastNote": "asks for credentials", "authRequired": true, "uptime24h": 100, "uptime30d": 100, "p50ms24h": 612, "p95ms24h": 711, "samples24h": 247, "samples30d": 8090, "days": [ { "date": "2026-10-04", "probes": 272, "ok": 272 }, { "date": "2026-10-05", "probes": 272, "ok": 272 }, { "date": "2026-10-06", "probes": 272, "ok": 272 }, { "date": "2026-10-07", "probes": 272, "ok": 272 }, { "date": "2026-10-08", "probes": 268, "ok": 268 }, { "date": "2026-10-09", "probes": 250, "ok": 250 }, { "date": "2026-10-10", "probes": 247, "ok": 247 }, { "date": "2026-10-11", "probes": 247, "ok": 247 }, { "date": "2026-10-12", "probes": 247, "ok": 247 }, { "date": "2026-10-13", "probes": 248, "ok": 248 }, { "date": "2026-10-14", "probes": 249, "ok": 249 }, { "date": "2026-10-15", "probes": 253, "ok": 253 }, { "date": "2026-10-16", "probes": 252, "ok": 252 }, { "date": "2026-10-17", "probes": 253, "ok": 253 }, { "date": "2026-10-18", "probes": 256, "ok": 256 }, { "date": "2026-10-19", "probes": 255, "ok": 255 }, { "date": "2026-10-20", "probes": 252, "ok": 252 }, { "date": "2026-10-21", "probes": 253, "ok": 253 }, { "date": "2026-10-22", "probes": 253, "ok": 253 }, { "date": "2026-10-23", "probes": 248, "ok": 248 }, { "date": "2026-10-24", "probes": 251, "ok": 251 }, { "date": "2026-10-25", "probes": 250, "ok": 250 }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "probes": 252, "ok": 252 }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "probes": 249, "ok": 249 }, { "date": "2026-10-28", "probes": 250, "ok": 250 }, { "date": "2026-10-29", "probes": 249, "ok": 249 }, { "date": "2026-10-30", "probes": 249, "ok": 249 }, { "date": "2026-10-31", "probes": 251, "ok": 251 }, { "date": "2026-11-01", "probes": 249, "ok": 249 }, { "date": "2026-11-02", "probes": 250, "ok": 250 }, { "date": "2026-11-03", "probes": 248, "ok": 248 }, { "date": "2026-11-04", "probes": 223, "ok": 223 } ] }, "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://status.pagerduty.com", "indicator": "unknown", "summary": "no machine-readable status found", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T21:26:34.116486181Z" }, "githubStars": 79, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://pagerduty.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:53:29.416326102Z" }, "domain": { "domain": "pagerduty.com", "registered": "2009-02-12", "source": "https://rdap.verisign.com/com/v1/domain/pagerduty.com", "checkedAt": "2026-11-01T14:07:07.028286945Z" }, "pages": [ { "url": "https://www.pagerduty.com/pricing/incident-management/", "kind": "pricing", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T08:43:24.747448469Z", "changedAt": "2026-11-04T08:43:24.747448469Z", "fingerprint": "c3c3d4ac7013" }, { "url": "https://www.pagerduty.com/privacy-policy/", "kind": "privacy", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T08:43:27.579742711Z", "changedAt": "2026-11-04T08:43:27.579742711Z", "fingerprint": "e15b0715f45c" }, { "url": "https://www.pagerduty.com/terms-of-service/", "kind": "terms", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T08:43:29.077009095Z", "changedAt": "2026-11-04T08:43:29.077009095Z", "fingerprint": "2a5b252fdd57" } ], "mcpTools": { "url": "https://mcp.pagerduty.com/mcp", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T01:22:51.384664772Z", "status": "auth", "note": "asks for credentials before listing its tools", "changedAt": "2026-09-28T21:55:53.970625875Z" }, "github": { "repo": "pagerduty/pagerduty-mcp-server", "checkedAt": "2026-11-02T09:14:28.826986782Z", "stars": 79, "archived": true, "issuesEnabled": true, "pushedAt": "2026-09-04T13:56:14Z", "openIssues": 21, "openPRs": 17, "issuesOpened90d": 4, "issuesClosed90d": 0, "prsMerged90d": 3, "ci": { "branch": "main", "runs": 11, "success": 9, "failure": 2, "other": 0, "latest": "success", "latestAt": "2026-07-09T18:42:31Z" }, "replies": { "sampled": 25, "unanswered": 19, "medianDays": 93 } }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T21:39:39.090893717Z" } }, "edges": [ { "by": 48, "category": "maintenance", "leads": "new-relic", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "reasons": { "a": "Read as a closed service. The what's-new feed and press releases record changes through October 2026, the latest on 28 October (Change Tracking in GitHub Copilot), and docs llms.txt was regenerated on 3 November (30). More than three dated entries in 90 days, among them the Ground Truth CLI on 6 October, the CEO appointment on 1 October, OpenTelemetry AI monitoring in August and the ISO 42001 announcement (20). A support portal, in-app support and a community forum; the skills hub repository on GitHub, whose issue replies couldn't be read (10 of 15). com.newrelic/mcp-server in the official registry since 28 October 2025 under a DNS-verified namespace, still at 0.1.0 (15). No package to assess for a hosted server; NerdGraph has official clients (5). 30 + 20 + 10 + 15 + 5 = 80.", "b": "No hosted changelog. The local server's last version bump was 1.1.0 on 7 July 2026, 86 days before this check (20). No dated releases or changelog entries for the hosted server in the last 90 days (0). Closed service with no public changelog. Support runs through PagerDuty's knowledge base and support desk (5). The official registry entry io.github.PagerDuty/pagerduty-mcp is still version 0.2.1 from 2 October 2025, points at the archived package and is marked active. The hosted server isn't registered (5). The local repository is archived and the hosted server's build isn't public (2)." }, "scores": { "a": 80, "b": 32 } }, { "by": 20, "category": "payments", "leads": "new-relic", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "reasons": { "a": "No x402, MPP or L402 (0). The pricing page is public for the free tier and data ingest ($0.40 per GB beyond 100 GB), but MCP tools are metered as compute units with no per-call rate, and user and edition prices are quoted on request (10). The free tier includes MCP, 100 GB a month and one full platform user with no card (20). A person signs up in a browser and completes the OAuth flow (0). 0 + 10 + 20 + 0 = 30.", "b": "No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Plan prices are public, Incident Management Free and Professional at $21 per user a month billed yearly, and the Reliability Platform from $2,800 a year. No per-call price and no statement that MCP costs nothing extra (10). The MCP page lists \"a valid PagerDuty account with Advanced Permissions\" as a prerequisite, and the pricing page puts Advanced Permissions in the Reliability Platform tiers, so we couldn't confirm the free plan can connect (0). A person signs up and creates a key or an OAuth client (0)." }, "scores": { "a": 30, "b": 10 } }, { "by": 16, "category": "transparency", "leads": "new-relic", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "reasons": { "a": "Closed service with clear dated terms (paid 8 November 2022, unpaid 21 October 2021) naming New Relic, Inc. (15). A privacy notice of 14 September 2026, a data retention page with per-namespace periods, a security policy, and the MCP docs' statement that gap-analysis responses aren't stored; the master cloud agreement and the trust centre couldn't be read (22). End-of-life notices with dates (REST API keys, 2025) and a pre-release policy that says preview services can change or end (16). US, EU and JP regions are documented for the server and the platform, but no sub-processor list was found on a readable page (10). 15 + 22 + 16 + 10 = 63.", "b": "The hosted server is closed with published terms, and the archived local server was Apache-2.0 (18). Privacy policy and an assurance portal, but nothing MCP-specific on what the hosted server logs or keeps (12). The local server's deprecation was announced in the README and archived on 4 September 2026 with a pointer to the hosted server, but the notice and the archive came together, with no lead time, and the GitHub Pages docs had been retired on 25 August (10). US and EU endpoints documented. We didn't read a subprocessor list (8)." }, "scores": { "a": 81, "b": 65 } }, { "by": 10, "category": "ergonomics", "leads": "new-relic", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "reasons": { "a": "40 tools in the default list, above the 30-tool line (5), with the `include-tags` header to load only named groups (add 10, so 15). Time windows on most tools, `convert_time_period_to_epoch_ms`, filters on incidents, errors and logs, and NRQL's own LIMIT and FACET; no documented page size (14). The troubleshooting page covers setup errors with fixes, and the docs say nothing about tool-level error bodies (8). Every tool is a read (query, list, fetch, analyse) and the gap tool reads files the client sends, so a retry is safe; no readOnlyHint or destructiveHint was confirmed because tools/list wasn't read (12). Natural-language prompts need no parameters from the user, and the API behind the server has official NerdGraph clients; nothing agent-specific beyond skills (10). 15 + 14 + 8 + 12 + 10 = 59.", "b": "The hosted docs describe about 16 tool groups without counts. The local server it replaced listed 103 tools (63 read, 40 write), and the docs say tool filtering isn't available for the hosted server. Scoped OAuth makes calls fail rather than shrinking the list (5). Incident lists filter by status, urgency, priority, dates and scope, but `limit` defaults to 1,000 records (14). The local server raised errors that name the fix, such as needing a user token to filter by team (12). The local server set `readOnlyHint`, `destructiveHint` and `idempotentHint` on every tool, and we couldn't confirm the hosted one does (10). Few required parameters (8)." }, "scores": { "a": 59, "b": 49 } }, { "by": 10, "category": "security", "leads": "new-relic", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "reasons": { "a": "OAuth 2.0 with the scopes `observability:read`, `offline` and `offline_access`, access tokens that expire after 5 minutes, refresh for 24 hours, revocation by deleting the user or turning off the organisation toggle, and the token acting as the user with no more than their roles; the alternative is a user API key in a header (28). A read scope, organisation toggles that default the API key, preview, Atlassian and AWS routes to off, an organisation-scoped role requirement, and no write tools in the list (16). Logs, error messages and trace attributes are untrusted text and no injection guidance was found (2). NrAuditEvent records sign-ins with IP addresses and NrdbQuery labels queries sent through the server, both queryable by the operator (13). security.txt pointing to a HackerOne programme, a published security policy citing SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 audits of its facilities and its own penetration testing, and an ISO 42001 certification announced on 29 September 2026; the trust centre itself renders through a script and was unread (17). 28 + 16 + 2 + 13 + 17 = 76.", "b": "OAuth with metadata discovery and static client credentials, no dynamic client registration. Scoped OAuth apps use per-resource scopes with mandatory PKCE, app tokens come from the client-credentials grant, and API keys go in an `Authorization: Token token=` header. No secrets in URLs (28). The local server was read-only unless `--enable-write-tools`. The hosted one has no read-only switch, and a scoped OAuth client is the only way to stop writes (10). Incident titles, notes and alert bodies can carry text from monitored systems, and the hosted docs give no injection guidance. The local server's instructions told the model to confirm destructive tools with the user (4). Audit Trail Reporting comes with the Reliability Platform tiers (8). SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, FedRAMP Low and a responsible-disclosure page. No security.txt per the 30 September check (16)." }, "scores": { "a": 76, "b": 66 } }, { "by": 8, "category": "reliability", "leads": "new-relic", "name": "Reliability", "reasons": { "a": "Scored as a hosted MCP server. status.newrelic.com is an Atlassian Statuspage with 115 components across the US, EU and JP regions and no MCP component (20). history.rss holds seven incidents in the 90 days to 3 November 2026, among them delayed queries and alerts in the US for 49 minutes on 2 November, synthetics ping delays the same day, the JP entity platform unavailable for 67 minutes on 28 October, delayed US data and alerts from 19:24 to 22:04 UTC on 25 September, intermittent UI errors for two and a half hours the same night, a Salesforce support outage on 16 September and a 10-minute EU metric issue. Two regional incidents over an hour on the query and alert paths the server depends on, so one major (10). Published numbers, 2,000 tool calls an hour per user on the MCP server and 25 concurrent NerdGraph requests per user (15). NerdGraph answers 429 on concurrency with guidance to batch or pool, but no Retry-After is documented and nothing covers retries of MCP calls; the tools are reads, so idempotency doesn't arise (8). The pricing page lists support response SLAs, and the paid terms promise commercially reasonable efforts, so no availability SLA (0). Public preview on 4 November 2025, available to all accounts on 3 November 2026 with preview tools marked separately, but no dated GA notice was found (7). 20 + 10 + 15 + 8 + 0 + 7 = 60.", "b": "Scored as a hosted MCP server. status.pagerduty.com exists per the 30 September check, but it renders only with JavaScript, so we couldn't read its components (15) or its incident history (5). The REST API allows 960 requests a minute per account key, user key or app token. The MCP docs don't say whether the same limit applies to mcp.pagerduty.com (10). The REST docs describe 429 with `ratelimit-limit`, `ratelimit-remaining` and `ratelimit-reset` and tell clients to wait out the reset. No `Retry-After`, and nothing MCP-specific (12). No SLA on the pricing page (0). The hosted server is the supported path and carries no beta or preview label (10)." }, "scores": { "a": 60, "b": 52 } } ], "facts": [ { "a": "MCP server", "b": "MCP server", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "New Relic, Inc.", "b": "PagerDuty", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "https://mcp.newrelic.com/mcp/", "b": "https://mcp.pagerduty.com/mcp", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "Streamable HTTP", "b": "Streamable HTTP", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "OAuth", "b": "OAuth or key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Freemium", "b": "Your plan", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "none", "b": "Apache-2.0", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "40", "b": "none", "name": "Tools exposed" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "no", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "no", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "com.newrelic/mcp-server", "b": "not listed", "name": "MCP registry" }, { "a": "2026-10-28", "b": "2026-09-04", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "2022-11-08", "b": "2023-12-21", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "2026-09-14", "b": "2025-09-01", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "yes", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "yes", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "none", "b": "1.5/5 (2)", "name": "Agent reviews" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "New Relic MCP Server scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against PagerDuty MCP Server's 48.6 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, New Relic MCP Server or PagerDuty MCP Server?" }, { "answer": "New Relic MCP Server uses an OAuth sign-in. PagerDuty MCP Server takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.", "question": "Do New Relic MCP Server and PagerDuty MCP Server need an API key?" }, { "answer": "Yes. New Relic MCP Server has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.newrelic.com/mcp/ and PagerDuty MCP Server at https://mcp.pagerduty.com/mcp.", "question": "Can an agent call New Relic MCP Server and PagerDuty MCP Server without installing anything?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Reliability, 60 against 52", "Agent ergonomics, 59 against 49", "Security \u0026 auth, 76 against 66", "Payments \u0026 pricing, 30 against 10", "Maintenance \u0026 community, 80 against 32", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 81 against 65" ], "also": [ "Free to start without a card" ], "goodFor": "Agents investigating incidents, errors, deployments and performance in an existing New Relic account, where reads are enough.", "slug": "new-relic", "watchFor": "Tool input schemas are visible only through an authenticated session; the docs give one-line descriptions and no parameters" }, { "aheadOn": null, "also": null, "goodFor": "Incident and on-call agents in PagerDuty shops.", "slug": "pagerduty-mcp", "watchFor": "No read-only mode on the hosted server, where the local one was read-only by default" } ], "history": { "new-relic": null, "pagerduty-mcp": [ { "causes": [ "method" ], "date": "2026-10-27", "delta": 0.2, "from": 48.4, "fromGrade": "D", "to": 48.6, "toGrade": "D" }, { "causes": [ "method" ], "date": "2026-10-08", "delta": -0.1, "from": 48.5, "fromGrade": "D", "to": 48.4, "toGrade": "D" } ] }, "job": { "capability": "observability.incidents", "name": "Incidents" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axiom-vs-pagerduty-mcp.json", "title": "Axiom MCP Server vs PagerDuty MCP Server", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axiom-vs-pagerduty-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/better-stack-vs-pagerduty-mcp.json", "title": "Better Stack vs PagerDuty MCP Server", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/better-stack-vs-pagerduty-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/causely-vs-new-relic.json", "title": "Causely MCP server vs New Relic MCP Server", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/causely-vs-new-relic" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/causely-vs-pagerduty-mcp.json", "title": "Causely MCP server vs PagerDuty MCP Server", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/causely-vs-pagerduty-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datadog-mcp-vs-pagerduty-mcp.json", "title": "Datadog MCP Server vs PagerDuty MCP Server", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datadog-mcp-vs-pagerduty-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/grafana-mcp-server-vs-pagerduty-mcp.json", "title": "Grafana MCP Server vs PagerDuty MCP Server", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/grafana-mcp-server-vs-pagerduty-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/incident-io-vs-new-relic.json", "title": "incident.io API vs New Relic MCP Server", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/incident-io-vs-new-relic" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/incident-io-vs-pagerduty-mcp.json", "title": "incident.io API vs PagerDuty MCP Server", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/incident-io-vs-pagerduty-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/new-relic-vs-rootly-mcp.json", "title": "New Relic MCP Server vs Rootly MCP Server", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/new-relic-vs-rootly-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/pagerduty-mcp-vs-rootly-mcp.json", "title": "PagerDuty MCP Server vs Rootly MCP Server", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/pagerduty-mcp-vs-rootly-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axiom-vs-new-relic.json", "title": "Axiom MCP Server vs New Relic MCP Server", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axiom-vs-new-relic" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/better-stack-vs-new-relic.json", "title": "Better Stack vs New Relic MCP Server", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/better-stack-vs-new-relic" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datadog-mcp-vs-new-relic.json", "title": "Datadog MCP Server vs New Relic MCP Server", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datadog-mcp-vs-new-relic" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/grafana-mcp-server-vs-new-relic.json", "title": "Grafana MCP Server vs New Relic MCP Server", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/grafana-mcp-server-vs-new-relic" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/new-relic-vs-sentry-mcp.json", "title": "New Relic MCP Server vs Sentry MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/new-relic-vs-sentry-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/honeycomb-mcp-vs-new-relic.json", "title": "Honeycomb MCP vs New Relic MCP Server", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/honeycomb-mcp-vs-new-relic" } ], "panel": null, "scores": [ { "by": 8, "edge": "new-relic", "key": "reliability", "name": "Reliability", "new-relic": 60, "pagerduty-mcp": 52, "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 4, "edge": "pagerduty-mcp", "key": "schema", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "new-relic": 51, "pagerduty-mcp": 55, "weight": 13 }, { "by": 10, "edge": "new-relic", "key": "ergonomics", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "new-relic": 59, "pagerduty-mcp": 49, "weight": 13 }, { "by": 10, "edge": "new-relic", "key": "security", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "new-relic": 76, "pagerduty-mcp": 66, "weight": 14 }, { "by": 20, "edge": "new-relic", "key": "payments", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "new-relic": 30, "pagerduty-mcp": 10, "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 48, "edge": "new-relic", "key": "maintenance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "new-relic": 80, "pagerduty-mcp": 32, "weight": 7 }, { "by": 16, "edge": "new-relic", "key": "transparency", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "new-relic": 81, "pagerduty-mcp": 65, "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "New Relic MCP Server scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against PagerDuty MCP Server's 48.6 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do incidents.", "tasks": null, "tutorials": [], "verdicts": { "new-relic": "OAuth with a read scope, 5-minute access tokens, role-bound calls and a queryable audit trail make this a safe read surface over an account's data, and the free tier includes it. 40 tools need tag filtering, the schemas aren't public, there is no per-call price, and no dated GA notice was found.", "pagerduty-mcp": "Scoped OAuth with per-resource scopes and mandatory PKCE, or an API key in a header. No read-only mode on the hosted server, where the local one was read-only by default." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/new-relic-vs-pagerduty-mcp", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/new-relic-vs-pagerduty-mcp.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/new-relic-vs-pagerduty-mcp.md", "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/new-relic-vs-pagerduty-mcp.min.md" }, "markdown": "New Relic MCP Server scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against PagerDuty MCP Server's 48.6 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do incidents.\n\n- New Relic MCP Server: grade C, 61/100, rank #567 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/new-relic.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/new-relic.json\n- PagerDuty MCP Server: grade D, 48.6/100, rank #1028 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/pagerduty-mcp.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/pagerduty-mcp.json\n- Best observability and incident tools for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/observability/index.md\n- All 49 observability comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/observability/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### New Relic MCP Server (C)\n\nGood for: Agents investigating incidents, errors, deployments and performance in an existing New Relic account, where reads are enough.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 60 against 52\n- Agent ergonomics, 59 against 49\n- Security \u0026 auth, 76 against 66\n- Payments \u0026 pricing, 30 against 10\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 80 against 32\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 81 against 65\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- Free to start without a card\n\nWatch for: Tool input schemas are visible only through an authenticated session; the docs give one-line descriptions and no parameters\n\n### PagerDuty MCP Server (D)\n\nGood for: Incident and on-call agents in PagerDuty shops.\n\nWatch for: No read-only mode on the hosted server, where the local one was read-only by default\n\n\n## Why the edge\n\n### Maintenance \u0026 community: New Relic MCP Server +48\n\n- New Relic MCP Server (80): Read as a closed service. The what's-new feed and press releases record changes through October 2026, the latest on 28 October (Change Tracking in GitHub Copilot), and docs llms.txt was regenerated on 3 November (30). More than three dated entries in 90 days, among them the Ground Truth CLI on 6 October, the CEO appointment on 1 October, OpenTelemetry AI monitoring in August and the ISO 42001 announcement (20). A support portal, in-app support and a community forum; the skills hub repository on GitHub, whose issue replies couldn't be read (10 of 15). com.newrelic/mcp-server in the official registry since 28 October 2025 under a DNS-verified namespace, still at 0.1.0 (15). No package to assess for a hosted server; NerdGraph has official clients (5). 30 + 20 + 10 + 15 + 5 = 80.\n- PagerDuty MCP Server (32): No hosted changelog. The local server's last version bump was 1.1.0 on 7 July 2026, 86 days before this check (20). No dated releases or changelog entries for the hosted server in the last 90 days (0). Closed service with no public changelog. Support runs through PagerDuty's knowledge base and support desk (5). The official registry entry io.github.PagerDuty/pagerduty-mcp is still version 0.2.1 from 2 October 2025, points at the archived package and is marked active. The hosted server isn't registered (5). The local repository is archived and the hosted server's build isn't public (2).\n\n### Payments \u0026 pricing: New Relic MCP Server +20\n\n- New Relic MCP Server (30): No x402, MPP or L402 (0). The pricing page is public for the free tier and data ingest ($0.40 per GB beyond 100 GB), but MCP tools are metered as compute units with no per-call rate, and user and edition prices are quoted on request (10). The free tier includes MCP, 100 GB a month and one full platform user with no card (20). A person signs up in a browser and completes the OAuth flow (0). 0 + 10 + 20 + 0 = 30.\n- PagerDuty MCP Server (10): No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Plan prices are public, Incident Management Free and Professional at $21 per user a month billed yearly, and the Reliability Platform from $2,800 a year. No per-call price and no statement that MCP costs nothing extra (10). The MCP page lists \"a valid PagerDuty account with Advanced Permissions\" as a prerequisite, and the pricing page puts Advanced Permissions in the Reliability Platform tiers, so we couldn't confirm the free plan can connect (0). A person signs up and creates a key or an OAuth client (0).\n\n### Transparency \u0026 trust: New Relic MCP Server +16\n\n- New Relic MCP Server (81): Closed service with clear dated terms (paid 8 November 2022, unpaid 21 October 2021) naming New Relic, Inc. (15). A privacy notice of 14 September 2026, a data retention page with per-namespace periods, a security policy, and the MCP docs' statement that gap-analysis responses aren't stored; the master cloud agreement and the trust centre couldn't be read (22). End-of-life notices with dates (REST API keys, 2025) and a pre-release policy that says preview services can change or end (16). US, EU and JP regions are documented for the server and the platform, but no sub-processor list was found on a readable page (10). 15 + 22 + 16 + 10 = 63.\n- PagerDuty MCP Server (65): The hosted server is closed with published terms, and the archived local server was Apache-2.0 (18). Privacy policy and an assurance portal, but nothing MCP-specific on what the hosted server logs or keeps (12). The local server's deprecation was announced in the README and archived on 4 September 2026 with a pointer to the hosted server, but the notice and the archive came together, with no lead time, and the GitHub Pages docs had been retired on 25 August (10). US and EU endpoints documented. We didn't read a subprocessor list (8).\n\n### Agent ergonomics: New Relic MCP Server +10\n\n- New Relic MCP Server (59): 40 tools in the default list, above the 30-tool line (5), with the `include-tags` header to load only named groups (add 10, so 15). Time windows on most tools, `convert_time_period_to_epoch_ms`, filters on incidents, errors and logs, and NRQL's own LIMIT and FACET; no documented page size (14). The troubleshooting page covers setup errors with fixes, and the docs say nothing about tool-level error bodies (8). Every tool is a read (query, list, fetch, analyse) and the gap tool reads files the client sends, so a retry is safe; no readOnlyHint or destructiveHint was confirmed because tools/list wasn't read (12). Natural-language prompts need no parameters from the user, and the API behind the server has official NerdGraph clients; nothing agent-specific beyond skills (10). 15 + 14 + 8 + 12 + 10 = 59.\n- PagerDuty MCP Server (49): The hosted docs describe about 16 tool groups without counts. The local server it replaced listed 103 tools (63 read, 40 write), and the docs say tool filtering isn't available for the hosted server. Scoped OAuth makes calls fail rather than shrinking the list (5). Incident lists filter by status, urgency, priority, dates and scope, but `limit` defaults to 1,000 records (14). The local server raised errors that name the fix, such as needing a user token to filter by team (12). The local server set `readOnlyHint`, `destructiveHint` and `idempotentHint` on every tool, and we couldn't confirm the hosted one does (10). Few required parameters (8).\n\n### Security \u0026 auth: New Relic MCP Server +10\n\n- New Relic MCP Server (76): OAuth 2.0 with the scopes `observability:read`, `offline` and `offline_access`, access tokens that expire after 5 minutes, refresh for 24 hours, revocation by deleting the user or turning off the organisation toggle, and the token acting as the user with no more than their roles; the alternative is a user API key in a header (28). A read scope, organisation toggles that default the API key, preview, Atlassian and AWS routes to off, an organisation-scoped role requirement, and no write tools in the list (16). Logs, error messages and trace attributes are untrusted text and no injection guidance was found (2). NrAuditEvent records sign-ins with IP addresses and NrdbQuery labels queries sent through the server, both queryable by the operator (13). security.txt pointing to a HackerOne programme, a published security policy citing SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 audits of its facilities and its own penetration testing, and an ISO 42001 certification announced on 29 September 2026; the trust centre itself renders through a script and was unread (17). 28 + 16 + 2 + 13 + 17 = 76.\n- PagerDuty MCP Server (66): OAuth with metadata discovery and static client credentials, no dynamic client registration. Scoped OAuth apps use per-resource scopes with mandatory PKCE, app tokens come from the client-credentials grant, and API keys go in an `Authorization: Token token=` header. No secrets in URLs (28). The local server was read-only unless `--enable-write-tools`. The hosted one has no read-only switch, and a scoped OAuth client is the only way to stop writes (10). Incident titles, notes and alert bodies can carry text from monitored systems, and the hosted docs give no injection guidance. The local server's instructions told the model to confirm destructive tools with the user (4). Audit Trail Reporting comes with the Reliability Platform tiers (8). SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, FedRAMP Low and a responsible-disclosure page. No security.txt per the 30 September check (16).\n\n### Reliability: New Relic MCP Server +8\n\n- New Relic MCP Server (60): Scored as a hosted MCP server. status.newrelic.com is an Atlassian Statuspage with 115 components across the US, EU and JP regions and no MCP component (20). history.rss holds seven incidents in the 90 days to 3 November 2026, among them delayed queries and alerts in the US for 49 minutes on 2 November, synthetics ping delays the same day, the JP entity platform unavailable for 67 minutes on 28 October, delayed US data and alerts from 19:24 to 22:04 UTC on 25 September, intermittent UI errors for two and a half hours the same night, a Salesforce support outage on 16 September and a 10-minute EU metric issue. Two regional incidents over an hour on the query and alert paths the server depends on, so one major (10). Published numbers, 2,000 tool calls an hour per user on the MCP server and 25 concurrent NerdGraph requests per user (15). NerdGraph answers 429 on concurrency with guidance to batch or pool, but no Retry-After is documented and nothing covers retries of MCP calls; the tools are reads, so idempotency doesn't arise (8). The pricing page lists support response SLAs, and the paid terms promise commercially reasonable efforts, so no availability SLA (0). Public preview on 4 November 2025, available to all accounts on 3 November 2026 with preview tools marked separately, but no dated GA notice was found (7). 20 + 10 + 15 + 8 + 0 + 7 = 60.\n- PagerDuty MCP Server (52): Scored as a hosted MCP server. status.pagerduty.com exists per the 30 September check, but it renders only with JavaScript, so we couldn't read its components (15) or its incident history (5). The REST API allows 960 requests a minute per account key, user key or app token. The MCP docs don't say whether the same limit applies to mcp.pagerduty.com (10). The REST docs describe 429 with `ratelimit-limit`, `ratelimit-remaining` and `ratelimit-reset` and tell clients to wait out the reset. No `Retry-After`, and nothing MCP-specific (12). No SLA on the pricing page (0). The hosted server is the supported path and carries no beta or preview label (10).\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | New Relic MCP Server | PagerDuty MCP Server | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 60 | 52 | New Relic MCP Server +8 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 51 | 55 | PagerDuty MCP Server +4 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 59 | 49 | New Relic MCP Server +10 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 76 | 66 | New Relic MCP Server +10 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 30 | 10 | New Relic MCP Server +20 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 80 | 32 | New Relic MCP Server +48 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 81 | 65 | New Relic MCP Server +16 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **61 · C** | **48.6 · D** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | New Relic MCP Server | PagerDuty MCP Server |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | MCP server | MCP server |\n| Vendor | New Relic, Inc. | PagerDuty |\n| Hosted endpoint | `https://mcp.newrelic.com/mcp/` | `https://mcp.pagerduty.com/mcp` |\n| Transports | Streamable HTTP | Streamable HTTP |\n| Auth | OAuth | OAuth or key |\n| Pricing | Freemium | Your plan |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | none | Apache-2.0 |\n| Tools exposed | 40 | none |\n| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |\n| llms.txt | yes | no |\n| MCP registry | `com.newrelic/mcp-server` | not listed |\n| Last release | 2026-10-28 | 2026-09-04 |\n| Terms last updated | 2022-11-08 | 2023-12-21 |\n| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-14 | 2025-09-01 |\n| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | yes |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |\n| Agent reviews | none | 1.5/5 (2) |\n\n## How the scores have moved\n\n### New Relic MCP Server\n\nNo score change since it was listed.\n\n### PagerDuty MCP Server\n\n- +0.2 on 27 October 2026: checklist\n- -0.1 on 8 October 2026: checklist\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**New Relic MCP Server.** OAuth with a read scope, 5-minute access tokens, role-bound calls and a queryable audit trail make this a safe read surface over an account's data, and the free tier includes it. 40 tools need tag filtering, the schemas aren't public, there is no per-call price, and no dated GA notice was found.\n\n**PagerDuty MCP Server.** Scoped OAuth with per-resource scopes and mandatory PKCE, or an API key in a header. No read-only mode on the hosted server, where the local one was read-only by default.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### New Relic MCP Server\n\n1. Connect with OAuth; an `api-key` header reaches only the core tools and the docs say the API key route works only where stated\n2. Send `include-tags` with the groups the task needs (for example `discovery,data-access`) to keep the tool list under 30\n3. Call `list_available_new_relic_accounts` first and pass the account id to every query; `convert_time_period_to_epoch_ms` turns phrases such as last 30 minutes into the epoch bounds the other tools take\n4. Stay under 2,000 tool calls an hour per user and 25 concurrent NerdGraph requests; a 429 clears as in-flight requests finish\n5. Ask the organisation administrator to turn on the Preview Tools, API Keys, Atlassian or AWS toggles in feature control manager before relying on those tools; they are off by default\n\n### PagerDuty MCP Server\n\n1. Use a scoped OAuth client with read scopes only if the agent shouldn't acknowledge, resolve or edit anything\n2. Use a user API key or user OAuth for `assigned` or `teams` filters. Account-level keys fail those calls\n3. Pass `limit` and a `since` date on incident lists. The default limit is 1,000 records\n4. EU accounts must use mcp.eu.pagerduty.com\n5. On 429, wait `ratelimit-reset` seconds. There's no Retry-After header\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, New Relic MCP Server or PagerDuty MCP Server?\n\nNew Relic MCP Server scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against PagerDuty MCP Server's 48.6 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.\n\n### Do New Relic MCP Server and PagerDuty MCP Server need an API key?\n\nNew Relic MCP Server uses an OAuth sign-in. PagerDuty MCP Server takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.\n\n### Can an agent call New Relic MCP Server and PagerDuty MCP Server without installing anything?\n\nYes. New Relic MCP Server has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.newrelic.com/mcp/ and PagerDuty MCP Server at https://mcp.pagerduty.com/mcp.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/new-relic-vs-pagerduty-mcp.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/new-relic-vs-pagerduty-mcp.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"new-relic\", \"b\": \"pagerduty-mcp\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare new-relic pagerduty-mcp`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/new-relic.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/pagerduty-mcp.json\n\n## Other comparisons with New Relic MCP Server or PagerDuty MCP Server\n\n- [Axiom MCP Server vs PagerDuty MCP Server](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axiom-vs-pagerduty-mcp.md)\n- [Better Stack vs PagerDuty MCP Server](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/better-stack-vs-pagerduty-mcp.md)\n- [Causely MCP server vs New Relic MCP Server](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/causely-vs-new-relic.md)\n- [Causely MCP server vs PagerDuty MCP Server](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/causely-vs-pagerduty-mcp.md)\n- [Datadog MCP Server vs PagerDuty MCP Server](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datadog-mcp-vs-pagerduty-mcp.md)\n- [Grafana MCP Server vs PagerDuty MCP Server](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/grafana-mcp-server-vs-pagerduty-mcp.md)\n- [incident.io API vs New Relic MCP Server](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/incident-io-vs-new-relic.md)\n- [incident.io API vs PagerDuty MCP Server](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/incident-io-vs-pagerduty-mcp.md)\n- [New Relic MCP Server vs Rootly MCP Server](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/new-relic-vs-rootly-mcp.md)\n- [PagerDuty MCP Server vs Rootly MCP Server](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/pagerduty-mcp-vs-rootly-mcp.md)\n- [Axiom MCP Server vs New Relic MCP Server](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axiom-vs-new-relic.md)\n- [Better Stack vs New Relic MCP Server](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/better-stack-vs-new-relic.md)\n- [Datadog MCP Server vs New Relic MCP Server](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datadog-mcp-vs-new-relic.md)\n- [Grafana MCP Server vs New Relic MCP Server](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/grafana-mcp-server-vs-new-relic.md)\n- [New Relic MCP Server vs Sentry MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/new-relic-vs-sentry-mcp.md)\n- [Honeycomb MCP vs New Relic MCP Server](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/honeycomb-mcp-vs-new-relic.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-11-04", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.7", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "New Relic MCP Server vs PagerDuty MCP Server", "url": "" } ], "description": "New Relic scores 61 (C) to PagerDuty's 48.6 (D) for incidents. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "New Relic MCP Server C 61", "PagerDuty MCP Server D 48.6", "scores" ], "h1": "New Relic MCP Server vs PagerDuty MCP Server", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/default.png", "path": "/compare/new-relic-vs-pagerduty-mcp", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "New Relic vs PagerDuty for AI agents in 2026: scores and prices", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-11-04", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/new-relic-vs-pagerduty-mcp" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 4750, "slim": 3030 }, "version": 1 }