# NanoClaw vs OpenDuet (slim)

> NanoClaw scores 68.6 (B) to OpenDuet's 49.5 (D) for proactive personal assistants. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nanoclaw-vs-openduet.md (~3,950 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nanoclaw-vs-openduet.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nanoclaw-vs-openduet
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-30
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

NanoClaw scores 68.6 (B) on agent readiness against OpenDuet's 49.5 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do proactive personal assistants.

- NanoClaw: B 68.6, rank #235 of 1239 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/nanoclaw.min.md
- OpenDuet: D 49.5, rank #962 of 1239 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/openduet.min.md
- NanoClaw, good for A technical owner who wants an assistant on their own machine, reachable from chat apps, with container isolation and scheduled tasks, and who is willing to keep a fork. Ahead on Reliability, 78 against 42; Schema & documentation, 82 against 58; Agent ergonomics, 70 against 52; Security & auth, 74 against 59; Payments & pricing, 60 against 30; Maintenance & community, 78 against 37. Also No key needed to call it.
- OpenDuet, good for A starting point for a developer or team who wants a proactive mail-and-calendar assistant they host and change, with approvals and audit, and who accepts a CopilotKit Intelligence account. Also No incidents deducted, where NanoClaw loses 5 points for them.

| Category | NanoClaw | OpenDuet |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 78 | 42 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 82 | 58 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 70 | 52 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 74 | 59 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 78 | 37 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 69 | 68 |

| Fact (where they differ) | NanoClaw | OpenDuet |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | NanoCo, Inc. | CopilotKit (Tawkit, Inc.) |
| Auth | None | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Licence | MIT | MIT. Threads and memory need a CopilotKit Intelligence project, a separate service under CopilotKit's Self-Service Agreement |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-09 | none |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-08-27 |
| Customer content may train models |  | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access |  | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking |  | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice |  | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |  | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | 31k stars | 1.6k stars |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | none |