# Muse Glimmer 30B vs North Mini Code 1.0 (slim)

> Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) to North Mini Code 1.0's 61 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-glimmer-30b-vs-north-mini-code-1-0.md (~10,100 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-glimmer-30b-vs-north-mini-code-1-0.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-glimmer-30b-vs-north-mini-code-1-0
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against North Mini Code 1.0's 61 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. North Mini Code 1.0 leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Muse Glimmer 30B: BB 70, rank #7 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/muse-glimmer-30b.min.md
- North Mini Code 1.0: C 61, rank #80 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/north-mini-code-1-0.min.md
- Muse Glimmer 30B, good for Local agents and coding with image input on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or an Apple silicon laptop, where one tool call per turn is enough Ahead on Reach, 90 against 85; Risk, 80 against 60; Documentation and upkeep, 65 against 36. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better.
- North Mini Code 1.0, good for Developers who want a coding agent on their own GPU with a permissive licence Ahead on Agent interface, 85 against 75.

| Category | Muse Glimmer 30B | North Mini Code 1.0 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 90 | 85 |
| Risk (20%) | 80 | 60 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 75 | 85 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 65 | 36 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Muse Glimmer 30B | North Mini Code 1.0 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Meta | Cohere |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-20 | 2026-07-29 |
| Agent reviews | 3.8/5 (4) | none |

Why the edge:
- Documentation and upkeep, Muse Glimmer 30B +29: Muse Glimmer 30B 65 (Model card 20, all seven parts present, languages as a count of more than 100. Training data 10, a general description with a 4 January 2026 cut-off and no sour…); North Mini Code 1.0 36 (Model card 11, Intended use, the architecture, the parameters and the context are on the card.)
- Risk, Muse Glimmer 30B +20: Muse Glimmer 30B 80 (File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF, with the ExecuTorch pos_embed.bin files read as raw embedding tables by their exact size and the Hub's scans, and no repos…); North Mini Code 1.0 60 (File safety 25, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository.)
- Agent interface, North Mini Code 1.0 +10: Muse Glimmer 30B 75 (Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository.); North Mini Code 1.0 85 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (12,397 characters).)
- Reach, Muse Glimmer 30B +5: Muse Glimmer 30B 90 (Memory 25, Meta's 16.8 GB Q4_K_M GGUF needs about 20 GB with the runtime's fifth, so it fits a 24 GB card but not 16 GB.); North Mini Code 1.0 85 (Memory 25, the smallest build from Cohere is the w4a16 repository, 19.38 GB, and 19.38 GB × 1.2 = 23.3 GB, within 24 GB.)