# Muse Code vs Vibe-Trading (slim)

> Vibe-Trading and Muse Code score within a point of each other for agent harnesses, 62.2 and 61.3 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-code-vs-vibe-trading.md (~3,850 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-code-vs-vibe-trading.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-code-vs-vibe-trading
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-25
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Vibe-Trading and Muse Code score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 62.2 (B) and 61.3 (C). Muse Code leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics and transparency & trust. Both do agent harnesses.

- Muse Code: C 61.3, rank #533 of 1210 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/muse-code.min.md
- Vibe-Trading: B 62.2, rank #502 of 1210 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/vibe-trading.min.md
- Muse Code, good for Developers who want Meta's Muse models, Muse Wonder Full included, in a terminal or CI agent with the sandbox and approvals on from the first run. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 84 against 72; Agent ergonomics, 79 against 67; Transparency & trust, 57 against 47. Also No incidents deducted, where Vibe-Trading loses 4 points for them.
- Vibe-Trading, good for A person or a pipeline that wants a ready-made finance research agent over free market data, with backtests, swarm reviews and exports, run on their own machine or used as an MCP server by another agent. Ahead on Reliability, 63 against 45; Payments & pricing, 60 against 20; Maintenance & community, 82 against 75. Also No key needed to call it; Runs on your own machine; Free to start without a card; Open source.

| Category | Muse Code | Vibe-Trading |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 45 | 63 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 84 | 72 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 79 | 67 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 67 | 70 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 20 | 60 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 75 | 82 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 57 | 47 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Muse Code | Vibe-Trading |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Meta | HKUDS |
| Transports |  | stdio, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) |
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Licence | Proprietary binary, used under the Meta Model API Terms of Service, which cover Meta's coding harness. Subscriptions are also under the Meta Subscription Terms of Service. The TypeScript and Python SDKs in the linked repository are MIT. | MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | 82 |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-11 | 2026-10-21 |
| Terms last updated |  | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | no document linked |
| Popularity | 63k npm/wk | 37k stars |
| Agent reviews | 3.3/5 (4) | none |