# MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview (slim)

> MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B scores 61 (C) to SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview's 46.8 (D) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b-vs-sensenova-loop-9b-preview.md (~10,400 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b-vs-sensenova-loop-9b-preview.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b-vs-sensenova-loop-9b-preview
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview's 46.8 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B: C 61, rank #77 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b.min.md
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview: D 46.8, rank #155 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/sensenova-loop-9b-preview.min.md
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B, good for Agents that need to read screenshots, documents and video on a local machine with 24 to 32 GB for the model, under a permissive licence Ahead on Reach, 90 against 40; Risk, 55 against 50; Agent interface, 70 against 60; Documentation and upkeep, 68 against 44.
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview, good for Researchers who want to study or fine-tune a looped transformer, more than agents that need a model to call today

| Category | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B | SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 90 | 40 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 50 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 70 | 60 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 68 | 44 |

| Fact (where they differ) | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B | SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | OpenBMB | SenseTime (SenseNova) |
| Last release | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | not read yet |

Why the edge:
- Reach, MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +50: MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 90 (Memory 25, since OpenBMB's IQ4_XS GGUF with its vision projector is 19.6 GB and needs about 23.6 GB with the fifth added, which fits 24 GB, while its Q4_K_M GGU…); SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview 40 (Memory 15, the only build is the safetensors set, 38.14 GB with its MTP head, since the Hub counts 9.41B of its parameters in F32. Runtimes 0, none of the six r…)
- Documentation and upkeep, MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +24: MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 68 (Model card 8, it covers intended use, architecture and parameters but not limitations, context length, languages or a knowledge cut-off.); SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview 44 (Model card 14, Intended use, the architecture, the parameter counts, the training context and the languages (in the metadata) are on the card.)
- Agent interface, MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +10: MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 70 (Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository.); SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview 60 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (7,756 characters).)
- Risk, MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +5: MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 55 (File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only, no Python in the main repository and no remote code needed.); SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview 50 (File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25).)