# MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Muse Glimmer 30B (slim)

> Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) to MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B's 61 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b-vs-muse-glimmer-30b.md (~9,300 tokens) · this version ~580 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b-vs-muse-glimmer-30b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b-vs-muse-glimmer-30b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B: C 61, rank #77 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b.min.md
- Muse Glimmer 30B: BB 70, rank #7 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/muse-glimmer-30b.min.md
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B, good for Agents that need to read screenshots, documents and video on a local machine with 24 to 32 GB for the model, under a permissive licence
- Muse Glimmer 30B, good for Local agents and coding with image input on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or an Apple silicon laptop, where one tool call per turn is enough Ahead on Risk, 80 against 55; Agent interface, 75 against 70. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better.

| Category | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B | Muse Glimmer 30B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 90 | 90 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 80 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 70 | 75 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 68 | 65 |

| Fact (where they differ) | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B | Muse Glimmer 30B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | OpenBMB | Meta |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-11-03 | 2026-10-20 |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.8/5 (4) |

Why the edge:
- Risk, Muse Glimmer 30B +25: MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 55 (File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only, no Python in the main repository and no remote code needed.); Muse Glimmer 30B 80 (File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF, with the ExecuTorch pos_embed.bin files read as raw embedding tables by their exact size and the Hub's scans, and no repos…)
- Agent interface, Muse Glimmer 30B +5: MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 70 (Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository.); Muse Glimmer 30B 75 (Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository.)