# MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Olmo 3 7B Think (slim)

> MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B scores 61 (C) to Olmo 3 7B Think's 52.3 (D) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minicpm-v-4-7-1b-vs-olmo-3-7b-think.md (~9,600 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minicpm-v-4-7-1b-vs-olmo-3-7b-think.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minicpm-v-4-7-1b-vs-olmo-3-7b-think
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Olmo 3 7B Think's 52.3 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Olmo 3 7B Think leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B: C 61, rank #76 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-1b.min.md
- Olmo 3 7B Think: D 52.3, rank #139 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/olmo-3-7b-think.min.md
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B, good for Agents that need a cheap local model to read screenshots, photos and short video on a phone, a laptop or beside a bigger model Ahead on Reach, 95 against 75; Agent interface, 70 against 35.
- Olmo 3 7B Think, good for Researchers and agents that want a small fully open reasoning model for maths and code, with its training data on hand Ahead on Risk, 75 against 55.

| Category | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B | Olmo 3 7B Think |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 95 | 75 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 75 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 70 | 35 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 48 | 52 |

| Fact (where they differ) | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B | Olmo 3 7B Think |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | OpenBMB | Ai2 (Allen Institute for AI) |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0, with Ai2's Responsible Use Guidelines named on the card |
| Last release | 2026-10-30 | 2026-06-25 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2024-09-25 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2025-02-19 |
| Customer content may train models | not read yet | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not read yet | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.8/5 (4) |

Why the edge:
- Agent interface, MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +35: MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 70 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, 7,249 characters.); Olmo 3 7B Think 35 (The chat template earns 20 for chat_template.jinja in the repository.)
- Reach, MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +20: MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 95 (Memory 30, OpenBMB's own IQ4_XS GGUF is 0.64 GB, 1.54 GB with the 0.90 GB vision projector, and 1.54 GB × 1.2 = 1.9 GB, which fits 16 GB with room to spare.); Olmo 3 7B Think 75 (Memory earns the full 30, since Ollama's 4-bit build is 4.5 GB and fits 8 GB (per the 21 October check of Ollama's library).)
- Risk, Olmo 3 7B Think +20: MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 55 (File safety 25, safetensors in the main repository and the AWQ, GPTQ and int4 builds, GGUF in the GGUF build, with no .bin, .pt, .pth or .py files in the main r…); Olmo 3 7B Think 75 (File safety earns 25, safetensors only and nothing from the repository runs.)