# Ming-3.0-tts-tiny vs OmniVoice (slim)

> OmniVoice scores 56.9 (C) to Ming-3.0-tts-tiny's 52.2 (D) for text-to-speech. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-tts-tiny-vs-omnivoice.md (~2,100 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-tts-tiny-vs-omnivoice.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-tts-tiny-vs-omnivoice
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

OmniVoice scores 56.9 (C) on agent readiness against Ming-3.0-tts-tiny's 52.2 (D), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Ming-3.0-tts-tiny leads on reach, risk and agent interface. Both do text-to-speech.

- Ming-3.0-tts-tiny: D 52.2, rank #88 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ming-3-0-tts-tiny.min.md
- OmniVoice: C 56.9, rank #72 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/omnivoice.min.md
- Ming-3.0-tts-tiny, good for Agents on a 24 GB NVIDIA GPU that need Chinese or English narration, voice cloning or multi-speaker audio under MIT Ahead on Reach, 50 against 40; Risk, 55 against 35; Agent interface, 60 against 50.
- OmniVoice, good for Research and non-commercial agents that need cloning or designed voices in low-resource languages on a small GPU

| Category | Ming-3.0-tts-tiny | OmniVoice |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 50 | 40 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 35 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 60 | 50 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 44 | 48 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Ming-3.0-tts-tiny | OmniVoice |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | k2-fsa (Next-gen Kaldi) |
| Licence | MIT | CC-BY-NC (weights, per the card); Apache-2.0 (code) |
| Last release | 2026-10-20 | 2026-07-03 |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | 2.3/5 (4) |