{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "ming-3-0-audio-tiny", "name": "Ming-3.0-audio-tiny", "vendor": "inclusionAI (Ant Group)", "vendorUrl": "https://www.inclusion-ai.org", "kind": "weights", "category": "speech-to-text", "summary": "Ming-3.0-audio-tiny is inclusionAI's open-weight audio-language model for Chinese and English speech recognition, audio understanding and spoken replies, 9.3B parameters with 2.7B active, published on Hugging Face under MIT.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ming-3-0-audio-tiny", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ming-3-0-audio-tiny.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ming-3-0-audio-tiny.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/ming-3-0-audio-tiny.json", "repo": "https://huggingface.co/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-tiny", "license": "MIT", "transports": [], "packages": [ { "registry": "huggingface", "name": "inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-tiny" } ], "auth": "none", "authNotes": "The weights download from Hugging Face with no account, token or terms to accept. The repository isn't gated (checked 2026-10-21). inclusionAI also publishes it on ModelScope.", "pricing": "free", "pricingNotes": "Free to download and use, commercial use included, under MIT. One bundled file, the fastText language-identification model in talker/data, is under CC BY-SA 3.0. inclusionAI sells no per-call access to these weights. Running them costs the hardware, about 20.8 GB of BF16 files (checked 2026-10-21).", "priceSummary": "Free", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "Weights you download and run yourself, so there is nothing to pay per call and no payment protocol (checked 2026-10-21).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-10-21" }, "docsUrl": "https://huggingface.co/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-tiny", "capabilities": [ "speech.stt", "speech.batch", "speech.languages", "speech.voices", "voice.speech-to-speech", "voice.tools", "voice.clone", "model.open-weights" ], "tags": [ "open-weights", "speech-to-text", "audio-understanding", "spoken-dialogue", "voice-cloning", "moe", "tool-calling", "chinese", "mit", "safetensors", "self-hosted", "new" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-20", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 49.8, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 0, "ranked": false, "notRankedWhy": "An open-weight model, graded by the open-weight checklist and ranked among open-weight models, not against tools", "rankOf": 1197, "categoryRank": 22, "methodology": "0.6", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "interface": 65, "reach": 45, "risk": 50, "upkeep": 46 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "low", "date": "2026-10-21" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "A small MIT-licensed audio-language model that transcribes Chinese and English, answers questions about audio and replies in a built-in or cloned voice. It needs about 25 GB and SGLang-Omni from main or inclusionAI's own vLLM-Omni and SGLang branches. The main risk is that every loading path runs repository code, with nothing published on safety.", "bestFor": "Self-hosted Chinese and English transcription, audio questions and spoken replies with tool calls on one GPU with about 25 GB free", "strengths": [ "MIT weights in safetensors, downloadable with no account", "Speech recognition, audio question answering and spoken replies in one 9.3B model with 2.7B active, one GPU for text or ASR", "About 480 built-in voices or a cloned voice from a reference WAV, with streamed speech through vLLM-Omni", "A Jinja chat template with tools, several calls per turn and a per-request thinking switch", "131,072 positions in config.json with no scaling" ], "weaknesses": [ "No named runtime runs it in a released version, only SGLang-Omni main and inclusionAI's own branches", "Every loading path runs repository code, and 40 compiled .pyc files ship under talker/", "BF16 only from inclusionAI, about 25 GB with headroom, and no inference provider", "No tool-call parser named, no JSON or timestamps documented, and no word on where reasoning text comes back", "No safety evaluation, agent guidance, training-data description, limitations or cut-off, and no security route of its own" ], "agentNotes": [ "Fastest start is SGLang-Omni from main, `sgl-omni serve --model-path inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-tiny --talker.gpu 0`, which exposes OpenAI-style /v1/audio/transcriptions, /v1/audio/speech and /v1/chat/completions", "For transcripts use greedy decoding with 10-gram blocking and the validated ASR prompt, and expect a language label, a tab, then the text", "Parse tool calls yourself from `\u003ctool_call\u003ename` with `\u003carg_key\u003e` and `\u003carg_value\u003e` pairs, since no runtime parser is named", "Thinking is off by default, turn it on with chat_template_kwargs enable_thinking true and strip the `\u003cthink\u003e` block from the reply yourself", "In vLLM-Omni pick a voice with audio.voice id from docs/voices.md, and don't combine it with a reference recording", "Review the repository's Python before passing trust_remote_code, and consider deleting the __pycache__ folders under talker/ so only readable source runs" ], "metrics": { "kind": "local", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 4, "avgRating": 2.5, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "low", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.6", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 49.8 } ], "editorialScores": { "interface": 65, "reach": 45, "risk": 50, "upkeep": 46 }, "provenanceScore": 31, "checked": { "categories": { "interface": "2026-10-21", "reach": "2026-10-21", "risk": "2026-10-21", "upkeep": "2026-10-21" }, "last": "2026-10-21", "oldest": "2026-10-21", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "# SGLang-Omni (main branch has the Ming-3.0 audio pipeline); install it per https://sgl-project.github.io/sglang-omni/\nsgl-omni serve --model-path inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-tiny --talker.gpu 0", "http": "curl http://127.0.0.1:8000/v1/audio/transcriptions \\\n -F model=inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-tiny \\\n -F file=@input.wav \\\n -F temperature=0" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/speech.stt", "tool": "https://letme.dev/ming-3-0-audio-tiny" }, "sameCompany": [ "ming-3-0-asr-tiny", "ming-3-0-audio-flash", "ming-3-0-tts-tiny", "ling-3-0-tiny" ], "weights": { "trainedBy": "inclusionAI (Ant Group)", "params": "9.3B", "active": "2.7B", "context": 131072, "goodFor": "Small audio-language model for Chinese and English speech recognition, audio understanding and spoken replies.", "runtimes": [], "builds": [ { "name": "Ming-3.0-audio-tiny", "url": "https://huggingface.co/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-tiny", "who": "publisher", "precision": "bf16", "sizeGB": 20.7, "memoryGB": 32, "format": "safetensors", "note": "Main shards 17.7 GB plus the Talker and VAE 3.0 GB; runs through SGLang-Omni or inclusionAI's code" } ], "run": "sgl-omni serve --model-path inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-tiny --talker.gpu 0", "runBuild": "Ming-3.0-audio-tiny", "checked": "2026-10-21", "minMemoryGB": 32 }, "family": { "lab": "inclusionAI (Ant Group)", "family": "Ming 3.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/open-weights/#inclusionai", "others": [ { "name": "Ming-3.0-tts-0.5B", "url": "https://huggingface.co/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-tts-0.5B", "params": "0.5B (dense)", "listing": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ming-3-0-tts-0-5b" }, { "name": "Ming-3.0-tts-tiny", "url": "https://huggingface.co/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-tts-tiny", "params": "7.9B total, about 1.3B active (backbone)", "listing": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ming-3-0-tts-tiny" }, { "name": "Ming-3.0-audio-flash", "url": "https://huggingface.co/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash", "params": "126B total, 6.5B active", "listing": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ming-3-0-audio-flash" }, { "name": "Ming-3.0-asr-tiny", "url": "https://huggingface.co/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-asr-tiny", "params": "not stated on the card (Hub metadata counts 8,865,800,992 in the files)", "listing": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ming-3-0-asr-tiny" } ], "olderCount": 54 }, "alsoIn": [ "voice-agents" ], "area": "voice", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "", "domain": "inclusion-ai.org", "domainRegistered": "2025-04-03", "endpointOnVendorDomain": null, "terms": "", "privacy": "", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://huggingface.co/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-tiny/commits/main", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-10-21", "notes": [ "The card names inclusionAI as the developer. inclusionAI's GitHub profile describes it as the series of open-source projects from Ant Group. No registered legal entity is named on the card, the repository or the site.", "Nothing is hosted, so the MIT licence stands in for terms of service and no privacy policy is scored.", "The changelog is the repository's commit history, some of whose messages say what changed (ASR prompt and generation settings on 5 September, voice selection on 19 October, SGLang-Omni serving on 20 October). The GitHub repository inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash has a fuller history.", "www.inclusion-ai.org/.well-known/security.txt answered 404 on 21 October 2026. The domain was registered on 3 April 2025 (Public Interest Registry RDAP).", "Ant Group runs a company-wide security response centre, AntSRC (https://security.alipay.com/, read on 21 October 2026). Nothing on inclusionAI's card or sites links it." ], "score": 31 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ming-3-0-audio-tiny.json" }, "answer": "Ming-3.0-audio-tiny scores 49.8 (D) on agent readiness against Underdog Bark 3.0's 48.2 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Underdog Bark 3.0 leads on reach.", "b": { "slug": "underdog-bark-3", "name": "Underdog Bark 3.0", "vendor": "Conway Research", "vendorUrl": "https://conway.tech", "kind": "weights", "category": "speech-to-text", "summary": "Underdog Bark 3.0 is Conway Research's open-weight English speech recognition model, a post-trained and compressed Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 in one 163 MB file, run with Conway's loader on Transformers, MLX or Core ML, under CC BY 4.0.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/underdog-bark-3", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/underdog-bark-3.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/underdog-bark-3.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/underdog-bark-3.json", "repo": "https://huggingface.co/ConwayResearch/Underdog-Bark-3.0", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "transports": [], "packages": [ { "registry": "huggingface", "name": "ConwayResearch/Underdog-Bark-3.0" } ], "auth": "none", "authNotes": "The files download from Hugging Face with no account, token or terms to accept. The repository isn't gated (checked 2026-10-21). The card's optional line about `hf auth login` applies only if access ever needs it.", "pricing": "free", "pricingNotes": "Free to download and use, commercial use included, under CC BY 4.0, which asks for attribution of NVIDIA, Moondream and Conway (the repository's NOTICE file). Running it costs the hardware. model.bark is 163.4 MB, and the Core ML packages about 0.2 GB each (checked 2026-10-21).", "priceSummary": "Free", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "Weights you download and run yourself, so there is nothing to pay per call and no payment protocol (checked 2026-10-21).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-10-21" }, "docsUrl": "https://huggingface.co/ConwayResearch/Underdog-Bark-3.0", "capabilities": [ "speech.stt", "speech.batch", "model.open-weights" ], "tags": [ "open-weights", "model", "speech-to-text", "asr", "english", "fastconformer", "tdt", "parakeet", "low-bit", "mlx", "core-ml", "apple-silicon", "on-device", "cc-by-4.0", "self-hosted" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-15", "graded": true, "disclosure": "Underdog Bark 3.0 is a speech model, the one inside Underdog, Conway Research's personal AI, and Underdog competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published open-weight checklist as every open-weight model, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default. underdog.ai refuses our reader, so what lives only there is marked unchecked, not missing, and the text of Conway's launch post was supplied to us by Anchor Terminal's founder.", "competesWith": "localghost", "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 48.2, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 0, "ranked": false, "notRankedWhy": "An open-weight model, graded by the open-weight checklist and ranked among open-weight models, not against tools", "rankOf": 1197, "categoryRank": 23, "methodology": "0.6", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "interface": 35, "reach": 65, "risk": 40, "upkeep": 49 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "low", "date": "2026-10-21" }, "negative": -2, "negativeNotes": [ "A misleading claim, 2 off. Conway's launch post of 21 October 2026, whose text Anchor Terminal's founder supplied because underdog.ai refuses our reader, calls Underdog Bark 3.0 'the #1 frontier speech model'. The Open ASR Leaderboard shows that false on every reading the post's own words allow, even granting Conway's own 4.937 per cent average over the seven public English sets its card uses, which isn't on the leaderboard. As the best speech model, 32 of the leaderboard's 65 rows average lower on those sets. As the best open model, 16 open-weight rows do, led by Hojo-ASR-V1 at 4.291. On AMI, the set the post cites, 19 rows score below its 7.82. And at its own size in the leaderboard's size column, two open models do better, Parakeet TDT 0.6B v2 (0.6B, 4.819) and Granite Speech 5.0 470M NC (0.47B, 4.921). Conway's card claims only state of the art for its size, measured by download, which the leaderboard can't test and is recorded as Conway's claim. 2, the low end of the range, because the card states the narrower position and the post reached us as supplied text (https://huggingface.co/datasets/hf-audio/open-asr-leaderboard-results/raw/main/english_short_latest.csv, results file last changed 19 October 2026)" ], "verdict": "A very small English transcription cousin, one 163 MB file built on NVIDIA's Parakeet TDT that Conway's loader expands into Transformers, MLX or Core ML, under CC BY 4.0. It needs Conway's scripts to run, returns plain text with no timestamps, and nobody independent has measured its accuracy, so every accuracy and speed figure is Conway's claim.", "bestFor": "Agents on Apple silicon or small machines that need English transcripts from a very small download, can run Conway's loader, and can accept accuracy nobody independent has measured", "disclosure": "Underdog Bark 3.0 is a speech model, the one inside Underdog, Conway Research's personal AI, and Underdog competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published open-weight checklist as every open-weight model, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default. underdog.ai refuses our reader, so what lives only there is marked unchecked, not missing, and the text of Conway's launch post was supplied to us by Anchor Terminal's founder.", "strengths": [ "A 163 MB download, about a fifteenth of Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3's 2.5 GB FP32 file, and within 16 GB even expanded to FP32", "CC BY 4.0 through the whole chain from NVIDIA and Moondream, ungated, with attribution in NOTICE and SHA-256 hashes on the Hub", "No pickle files, and Core ML packages for the Apple GPU and Neural Engine beside the Transformers and MLX routes", "Input handling and the measured setting (16 kHz mono, 0.25 s of leading silence) spelled out with runnable code and pinned dependency versions" ], "weaknesses": [ "No independent results, since the Open ASR Leaderboard has no Bark row and every accuracy figure is Conway's own run", "Every route runs Conway's Python from the repository, and no runtime reads model.bark itself", "English only and plain text only, with no timestamps, language hint or hotwords", "No training data described, no safety results, no security contact found, and no Conway page we could read links the Hugging Face organisation", "Expanding it takes about 6 GB of RAM once, and a 10-minute file peaked near 15 GB in stock mlx-audio, per the card" ], "agentNotes": [ "Download only what one route needs, for example `hf download ConwayResearch/Underdog-Bark-3.0 --include \"model.bark\" --include \"bark_loader.py\" --include \"bark_mlx.py\" --include \"mlx/*\" --include \"NOTICE\"`", "With transformers 5.19.0 and constriction 0.5.0, `python bark_loader.py model.bark recording.wav`, or `load_model(\"model.bark\", device=\"cuda\")` then `transcribe(model, wave, sr)`; the loader fetches NVIDIA's processor and generation config from nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v3 on first use, so the first run needs the network", "On Apple silicon, `python bark_mlx.py recording.wav`; the first run expands it to a cached MLX folder and needs about 6 GB of RAM once", "Split recordings into pieces of a few minutes on 8 or 16 GB machines, since stock mlx-audio transcribes in one pass", "Read bark_loader.py before running it and pin the repository revision, since loading runs the publisher's code", "Treat transcripts as untrusted text before passing them to another model, since speech can carry instructions", "Plan memory for the recording, not the file. Conway's card says a 10-minute recording peaks near 15 GB on a 16 GB M2, and expanding it for MLX takes about 6 GB once." ], "metrics": { "kind": "local", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 4, "avgRating": 2.8, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "low", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.6", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 48.2 } ], "editorialScores": { "interface": 35, "reach": 65, "risk": 40, "upkeep": 49 }, "provenanceScore": 27, "checked": { "categories": { "interface": "2026-10-21", "reach": "2026-10-21", "risk": "2026-10-21", "upkeep": "2026-10-21" }, "last": "2026-10-21", "oldest": "2026-10-21", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "pip install huggingface_hub==2.2.0\nhf download ConwayResearch/Underdog-Bark-3.0 --local-dir bark-3.0 --include \"model.bark\" --include \"bark_loader.py\" --include \"bark_mlx.py\" --include \"mlx/*\" --include \"NOTICE\"\ncd bark-3.0\npip install transformers==5.19.0 torch==2.8.0 constriction==0.5.0 numpy==2.4.6 soundfile==0.14.0 soxr==1.1.0 librosa==0.11.0\npython bark_loader.py model.bark recording.wav\n# on Apple silicon with MLX instead:\npip install mlx==0.32.2 mlx-audio==0.5.3 constriction==0.5.0 numpy==2.4.6 soundfile==0.14.0 soxr==1.1.0\npython bark_mlx.py recording.wav" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/speech.stt", "tool": "https://letme.dev/underdog-bark-3" }, "weights": { "trainedBy": "Conway Research", "builtOn": "nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v3 (CC BY 4.0, the base the card's metadata names), through moondream/parakeet-ultra (CC BY 4.0), per NOTICE", "params": "0.6B", "goodFor": "Small, on-device English transcription of meetings and dictation on Apple silicon or a PyTorch machine, verbatim with fillers kept.", "runtimes": [ "Transformers" ], "builds": [ { "name": "model.bark", "url": "https://huggingface.co/ConwayResearch/Underdog-Bark-3.0/blob/main/model.bark", "who": "publisher", "precision": "low-bit (entropy-coded per-row levels for encoder linear weights, 5 or 6 bit integers for other matrices, fp16 small tensors)", "sizeGB": 0.16, "memoryGB": 8, "format": "bark", "runsOn": [ "Transformers", "mlx-audio" ], "note": "Conway's own format, read only by the repository's bark_loader.py, which expands it to FP32 for Transformers, or by bark_mlx.py, which writes an FP16 or 4-bit MLX folder for mlx-audio. About 2.1 bits a parameter as stored, entropy-coded; the bit width isn't stated The band comes from the file size, as for every build. Conway's card says expanding it for MLX takes about 6 GB once and a 10-minute recording peaks near 15 GB on a 16 GB M2, so long recordings need more than the band." }, { "name": "Core ML (Apple GPU)", "url": "https://huggingface.co/ConwayResearch/Underdog-Bark-3.0/tree/main/coreml/gpu", "who": "publisher", "precision": "the same quantised values as model.bark, FP16 encoder arithmetic", "sizeGB": 0.2, "memoryGB": 8, "format": "coreml", "runsOn": [ "Core ML" ], "note": "BarkEncoder.mlpackage with a fixed 15-second window, decoder.npz and vocab.json, run by coreml/gpu/bark_coreml.py" }, { "name": "Core ML (Apple Neural Engine)", "url": "https://huggingface.co/ConwayResearch/Underdog-Bark-3.0/tree/main/coreml/ane", "who": "publisher", "precision": "the same quantised values as model.bark, FP16 encoder arithmetic", "sizeGB": 0.2, "memoryGB": 8, "format": "coreml", "runsOn": [ "Core ML" ], "note": "BarkEncoder.mlpackage with 8 and 15 second functions sharing weights, decoder.npz and vocab.json, run by coreml/ane/bark_coreml.py" } ], "run": "python bark_loader.py model.bark recording.wav", "runBuild": "model.bark", "checked": "2026-10-21", "minMemoryGB": 8 }, "family": { "lab": "Conway Research", "family": "Underdog Bark", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/open-weights/#conway" }, "area": "voice", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "", "domain": "conway.tech", "domainRegistered": "2025-11-08", "endpointOnVendorDomain": null, "terms": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en", "privacy": "", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://huggingface.co/ConwayResearch/Underdog-Bark-3.0/commits/main", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-10-21", "notes": [ "The model sits in the ConwayResearch organisation on Hugging Face, named Conway and unverified, whose Bark 3.0 commits both come from the Hugging Face account of Sigil Wen, whom sigilwen.ca/conway names as Conway's founder. conway.tech (page and script), sigilwen.ca/conway and Conway-Research/automaton's README don't link the organisation, and underdog.ai, which the card links, refuses our reader, so a link from Conway's own site is unchecked.", "No registered company name found, as in the Underdog listing of 3 October 2026. The Hugging Face organisation and conway.tech both say Conway. RDAP gives conway.tech a registration date of 8 November 2025 (rechecked 21 October 2026).", "Nothing is hosted for this listing, so the licence stands in for terms of service and no privacy policy is scored.", "The changelog is the commit history, two commits on 15 October 2026 (initial commit and Underdog Bark 3.0). No release notes outside underdog.ai were found.", "conway.tech/.well-known/security.txt answered 404 on 21 October 2026, and the repository has no security file. underdog.ai is unchecked." ], "score": 27 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/underdog-bark-3.json" }, "facts": [ { "a": "Open-weight model", "b": "Open-weight model", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "inclusionAI (Ant Group)", "b": "Conway Research", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "no (local only)", "b": "no (local only)", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "None", "b": "None", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Free", "b": "Free", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "MIT", "b": "CC-BY-4.0", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "2026-10-20", "b": "2026-10-15", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "no document linked", "b": "", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "no document linked", "b": "no document linked", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "2.5/5 (4)", "b": "2.8/5 (4)", "name": "Agent reviews" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "Ming-3.0-audio-tiny scores 49.8 (D) on agent readiness against Underdog Bark 3.0's 48.2 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Underdog Bark 3.0 leads on reach.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, Ming-3.0-audio-tiny or Underdog Bark 3.0?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Risk, 50 against 40", "Agent interface, 65 against 35" ], "also": null, "goodFor": "Self-hosted Chinese and English transcription, audio questions and spoken replies with tool calls on one GPU with about 25 GB free", "slug": "ming-3-0-audio-tiny", "watchFor": "No named runtime runs it in a released version, only SGLang-Omni main and inclusionAI's own branches" }, { "aheadOn": [ "Reach, 65 against 45" ], "also": null, "goodFor": "Agents on Apple silicon or small machines that need English transcripts from a very small download, can run Conway's loader, and can accept accuracy nobody independent has measured", "slug": "underdog-bark-3", "watchFor": "No independent results, since the Open ASR Leaderboard has no Bark row and every accuracy figure is Conway's own run" } ], "job": { "capability": "speech.stt", "name": "Speech-to-text" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-transcribe-03-2026-vs-ming-3-0-audio-tiny.json", "title": "Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Ming-3.0-audio-tiny", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-transcribe-03-2026-vs-ming-3-0-audio-tiny" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-transcribe-03-2026-vs-underdog-bark-3.json", "title": "Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Underdog Bark 3.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-transcribe-03-2026-vs-underdog-bark-3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-ming-3-0-audio-tiny.json", "title": "Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Ming-3.0-audio-tiny", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-ming-3-0-audio-tiny" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-underdog-bark-3.json", "title": "Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Underdog Bark 3.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-underdog-bark-3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-ming-3-0-audio-tiny.json", "title": "Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Ming-3.0-audio-tiny", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-ming-3-0-audio-tiny" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-underdog-bark-3.json", "title": "Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Underdog Bark 3.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-underdog-bark-3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-nemotron-3-5-asr-streaming-0-6b.json", "title": "Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-nemotron-3-5-asr-streaming-0-6b" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning.json", "title": "Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-parakeet-tdt-0-6b-v3.json", "title": "Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-parakeet-tdt-0-6b-v3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-qwen3-asr-0-6b.json", "title": "Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Qwen3-ASR-0.6B", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-qwen3-asr-0-6b" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-qwen3-asr-1-7b.json", "title": "Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-qwen3-asr-1-7b" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-qwen3-omni-30b-a3b-instruct.json", "title": "Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-qwen3-omni-30b-a3b-instruct" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-voxtral-mini-4b-realtime-2602.json", "title": "Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-voxtral-mini-4b-realtime-2602" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nemotron-3-5-asr-streaming-0-6b-vs-underdog-bark-3.json", "title": "Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B vs Underdog Bark 3.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nemotron-3-5-asr-streaming-0-6b-vs-underdog-bark-3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning-vs-underdog-bark-3.json", "title": "Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Underdog Bark 3.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning-vs-underdog-bark-3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/parakeet-tdt-0-6b-v3-vs-underdog-bark-3.json", "title": "Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 vs Underdog Bark 3.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/parakeet-tdt-0-6b-v3-vs-underdog-bark-3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-asr-0-6b-vs-underdog-bark-3.json", "title": "Qwen3-ASR-0.6B vs Underdog Bark 3.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-asr-0-6b-vs-underdog-bark-3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-asr-1-7b-vs-underdog-bark-3.json", "title": "Qwen3-ASR-1.7B vs Underdog Bark 3.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-asr-1-7b-vs-underdog-bark-3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-omni-30b-a3b-instruct-vs-underdog-bark-3.json", "title": "Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Underdog Bark 3.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-omni-30b-a3b-instruct-vs-underdog-bark-3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/underdog-bark-3-vs-voxtral-mini-4b-realtime-2602.json", "title": "Underdog Bark 3.0 vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/underdog-bark-3-vs-voxtral-mini-4b-realtime-2602" } ], "scores": [ { "key": "capability", "name": "Capability", "pending": true, "weight": 35 }, { "by": 20, "edge": "underdog-bark-3", "key": "reach", "ming-3-0-audio-tiny": 45, "name": "Reach", "underdog-bark-3": 65, "weight": 25 }, { "by": 10, "edge": "ming-3-0-audio-tiny", "key": "risk", "ming-3-0-audio-tiny": 50, "name": "Risk", "underdog-bark-3": 40, "weight": 20 }, { "by": 30, "edge": "ming-3-0-audio-tiny", "key": "interface", "ming-3-0-audio-tiny": 65, "name": "Agent interface", "underdog-bark-3": 35, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 3, "edge": "underdog-bark-3", "key": "upkeep", "ming-3-0-audio-tiny": 46, "name": "Documentation and upkeep", "underdog-bark-3": 49, "weight": 10 } ], "summary": "Ming-3.0-audio-tiny scores 49.8 (D) on agent readiness against Underdog Bark 3.0's 48.2 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Underdog Bark 3.0 leads on reach. Both do speech-to-text.", "tutorials": [], "verdicts": { "ming-3-0-audio-tiny": "A small MIT-licensed audio-language model that transcribes Chinese and English, answers questions about audio and replies in a built-in or cloned voice. It needs about 25 GB and SGLang-Omni from main or inclusionAI's own vLLM-Omni and SGLang branches. The main risk is that every loading path runs repository code, with nothing published on safety.", "underdog-bark-3": "A very small English transcription cousin, one 163 MB file built on NVIDIA's Parakeet TDT that Conway's loader expands into Transformers, MLX or Core ML, under CC BY 4.0. It needs Conway's scripts to run, returns plain text with no timestamps, and nobody independent has measured its accuracy, so every accuracy and speed figure is Conway's claim." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-underdog-bark-3", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-underdog-bark-3.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-underdog-bark-3.md", "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-underdog-bark-3.min.md" }, "markdown": "Ming-3.0-audio-tiny scores 49.8 (D) on agent readiness against Underdog Bark 3.0's 48.2 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Underdog Bark 3.0 leads on reach. Both do speech-to-text.\n\n- Ming-3.0-audio-tiny: grade D, 49.8/100, rank #95 of 100 open-weight models. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ming-3-0-audio-tiny.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/ming-3-0-audio-tiny.json\n- Underdog Bark 3.0: grade D, 48.2/100, rank #96 of 100 open-weight models. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/underdog-bark-3.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/underdog-bark-3.json\n- Best speech-to-text APIs for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/speech-to-text/index.md\n- All 231 stt comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/speech-to-text/index.md\n- Best conversational voice-agent APIs: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/voice-agents/index.md\n- All 388 voice agents comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/voice-agents/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### Ming-3.0-audio-tiny (D)\n\nGood for: Self-hosted Chinese and English transcription, audio questions and spoken replies with tool calls on one GPU with about 25 GB free\n\nAhead on:\n- Risk, 50 against 40\n- Agent interface, 65 against 35\n\nWatch for: No named runtime runs it in a released version, only SGLang-Omni main and inclusionAI's own branches\n\n### Underdog Bark 3.0 (D)\n\nGood for: Agents on Apple silicon or small machines that need English transcripts from a very small download, can run Conway's loader, and can accept accuracy nobody independent has measured\n\nAhead on:\n- Reach, 65 against 45\n\nWatch for: No independent results, since the Open ASR Leaderboard has no Bark row and every accuracy figure is Conway's own run\n\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Ming-3.0-audio-tiny | Underdog Bark 3.0 | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Capability | 35%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Reach | 25% (25 this run) | 45 | 65 | Underdog Bark 3.0 +20 |\n| Risk | 20% (20 this run) | 50 | 40 | Ming-3.0-audio-tiny +10 |\n| Agent interface | 10% (10 this run) | 65 | 35 | Ming-3.0-audio-tiny +30 |\n| Documentation and upkeep | 10% (10 this run) | 46 | 49 | Underdog Bark 3.0 +3 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |\n| **Total** | | **49.8 · D** | **48.2 · D** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Ming-3.0-audio-tiny | Underdog Bark 3.0 |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |\n| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | Conway Research |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |\n| Transports | | |\n| Auth | None | None |\n| Pricing | Free | Free |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | MIT | CC-BY-4.0 |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | no |\n| llms.txt | no | no |\n| Last release | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-15 |\n| Terms last updated | no document linked | |\n| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |\n| Customer content may train models | | |\n| Terms restrict automated access | | |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | | |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | | |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | | |\n| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Ming-3.0-audio-tiny.** A small MIT-licensed audio-language model that transcribes Chinese and English, answers questions about audio and replies in a built-in or cloned voice. It needs about 25 GB and SGLang-Omni from main or inclusionAI's own vLLM-Omni and SGLang branches. The main risk is that every loading path runs repository code, with nothing published on safety.\n\n**Underdog Bark 3.0.** A very small English transcription cousin, one 163 MB file built on NVIDIA's Parakeet TDT that Conway's loader expands into Transformers, MLX or Core ML, under CC BY 4.0. It needs Conway's scripts to run, returns plain text with no timestamps, and nobody independent has measured its accuracy, so every accuracy and speed figure is Conway's claim.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Ming-3.0-audio-tiny\n\n1. Fastest start is SGLang-Omni from main, `sgl-omni serve --model-path inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-tiny --talker.gpu 0`, which exposes OpenAI-style /v1/audio/transcriptions, /v1/audio/speech and /v1/chat/completions\n2. For transcripts use greedy decoding with 10-gram blocking and the validated ASR prompt, and expect a language label, a tab, then the text\n3. Parse tool calls yourself from `\u003ctool_call\u003ename` with `\u003carg_key\u003e` and `\u003carg_value\u003e` pairs, since no runtime parser is named\n4. Thinking is off by default, turn it on with chat_template_kwargs enable_thinking true and strip the `\u003cthink\u003e` block from the reply yourself\n5. In vLLM-Omni pick a voice with audio.voice id from docs/voices.md, and don't combine it with a reference recording\n6. Review the repository's Python before passing trust_remote_code, and consider deleting the __pycache__ folders under talker/ so only readable source runs\n\n### Underdog Bark 3.0\n\n1. Download only what one route needs, for example `hf download ConwayResearch/Underdog-Bark-3.0 --include \"model.bark\" --include \"bark_loader.py\" --include \"bark_mlx.py\" --include \"mlx/*\" --include \"NOTICE\"`\n2. With transformers 5.19.0 and constriction 0.5.0, `python bark_loader.py model.bark recording.wav`, or `load_model(\"model.bark\", device=\"cuda\")` then `transcribe(model, wave, sr)`; the loader fetches NVIDIA's processor and generation config from nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v3 on first use, so the first run needs the network\n3. On Apple silicon, `python bark_mlx.py recording.wav`; the first run expands it to a cached MLX folder and needs about 6 GB of RAM once\n4. Split recordings into pieces of a few minutes on 8 or 16 GB machines, since stock mlx-audio transcribes in one pass\n5. Read bark_loader.py before running it and pin the repository revision, since loading runs the publisher's code\n6. Treat transcripts as untrusted text before passing them to another model, since speech can carry instructions\n7. Plan memory for the recording, not the file. Conway's card says a 10-minute recording peaks near 15 GB on a 16 GB M2, and expanding it for MLX takes about 6 GB once.\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, Ming-3.0-audio-tiny or Underdog Bark 3.0?\n\nMing-3.0-audio-tiny scores 49.8 (D) on agent readiness against Underdog Bark 3.0's 48.2 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Underdog Bark 3.0 leads on reach.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-underdog-bark-3.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-underdog-bark-3.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"ming-3-0-audio-tiny\", \"b\": \"underdog-bark-3\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare ming-3-0-audio-tiny underdog-bark-3`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/ming-3-0-audio-tiny.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/underdog-bark-3.json\n\n## Other comparisons with Ming-3.0-audio-tiny or Underdog Bark 3.0\n\n- [Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Ming-3.0-audio-tiny](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-transcribe-03-2026-vs-ming-3-0-audio-tiny.md)\n- [Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Underdog Bark 3.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-transcribe-03-2026-vs-underdog-bark-3.md)\n- [Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Ming-3.0-audio-tiny](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-ming-3-0-audio-tiny.md)\n- [Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Underdog Bark 3.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-underdog-bark-3.md)\n- [Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Ming-3.0-audio-tiny](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-ming-3-0-audio-tiny.md)\n- [Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Underdog Bark 3.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-underdog-bark-3.md)\n- [Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-nemotron-3-5-asr-streaming-0-6b.md)\n- [Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning.md)\n- [Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-parakeet-tdt-0-6b-v3.md)\n- [Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Qwen3-ASR-0.6B](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-qwen3-asr-0-6b.md)\n- [Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-qwen3-asr-1-7b.md)\n- [Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-qwen3-omni-30b-a3b-instruct.md)\n- [Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-voxtral-mini-4b-realtime-2602.md)\n- [Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B vs Underdog Bark 3.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nemotron-3-5-asr-streaming-0-6b-vs-underdog-bark-3.md)\n- [Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Underdog Bark 3.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning-vs-underdog-bark-3.md)\n- [Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 vs Underdog Bark 3.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/parakeet-tdt-0-6b-v3-vs-underdog-bark-3.md)\n- [Qwen3-ASR-0.6B vs Underdog Bark 3.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-asr-0-6b-vs-underdog-bark-3.md)\n- [Qwen3-ASR-1.7B vs Underdog Bark 3.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-asr-1-7b-vs-underdog-bark-3.md)\n- [Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Underdog Bark 3.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-omni-30b-a3b-instruct-vs-underdog-bark-3.md)\n- [Underdog Bark 3.0 vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/underdog-bark-3-vs-voxtral-mini-4b-realtime-2602.md)\n\n## Disclosure\n\n- Underdog Bark 3.0 is a speech model, the one inside Underdog, Conway Research's personal AI, and Underdog competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published open-weight checklist as every open-weight model, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default. underdog.ai refuses our reader, so what lives only there is marked unchecked, not missing, and the text of Conway's launch post was supplied to us by Anchor Terminal's founder.\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-10-21", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.6", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Underdog Bark 3.0", "url": "" } ], "description": "Ming-3.0-audio-tiny scores 49.8 (D) to Underdog Bark 3.0's 48.2 (D) for speech-to-text. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "Ming-3.0-audio-tiny D 49.8", "Underdog Bark 3.0 D 48.2", "scores" ], "h1": "Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Underdog Bark 3.0", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/compare-ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-underdog-bark-3.png", "path": "/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-underdog-bark-3", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Underdog Bark 3.0 for AI agents (2026)", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-10-21", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-underdog-bark-3" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 2800, "slim": 480 }, "version": 1 }