{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "ming-3-0-audio-flash", "name": "Ming-3.0-audio-flash", "vendor": "inclusionAI (Ant Group)", "vendorUrl": "https://www.inclusion-ai.org", "kind": "weights", "category": "speech-to-text", "summary": "Ming-3.0-audio-flash is inclusionAI's open-weight audio-language model for Chinese and English. It takes audio with text instructions and returns transcripts, answers about the audio, or spoken replies, 126B parameters with 6.5B active, under MIT.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ming-3-0-audio-flash", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ming-3-0-audio-flash.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ming-3-0-audio-flash.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/ming-3-0-audio-flash.json", "repo": "https://huggingface.co/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash", "license": "MIT", "transports": [], "packages": [ { "registry": "huggingface", "name": "inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash" } ], "auth": "none", "authNotes": "The weights download from Hugging Face with no account, token or terms to accept. The repository isn't gated (checked 2026-10-21). ModelScope carries the same model under inclusionAI's organisation.", "pricing": "free", "pricingNotes": "Free to download and use, commercial use included, under MIT. inclusionAI sells no per-call access to these weights. Running them costs the hardware, 259.4 GB of BF16 files and eight 80 GB GPUs in inclusionAI's 128K serving profile (checked 2026-10-21).", "priceSummary": "Free", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "Weights you download and run yourself, so there is nothing to pay per call and no payment protocol (checked 2026-10-21).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-10-21" }, "docsUrl": "https://github.com/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash", "capabilities": [ "speech.stt", "speech.batch", "speech.languages", "voice.speech-to-speech", "model.open-weights" ], "tags": [ "open-weights", "speech-to-text", "audio-understanding", "speech-to-speech", "voice-cloning", "moe", "mit", "safetensors", "chinese", "english", "self-hosted", "new" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-20", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 42.5, "grade": "E", "agentReady": false, "rank": 0, "ranked": false, "notRankedWhy": "An open-weight model, graded by the open-weight checklist and ranked among open-weight models, not against tools", "rankOf": 1197, "categoryRank": 24, "methodology": "0.6", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "interface": 65, "reach": 25, "risk": 50, "upkeep": 49 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "low", "date": "2026-10-21" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Ming-3.0-audio-flash is a cousin for Chinese and English transcription, questions about long audio and spoken replies in built-in or cloned voices, under MIT. It needs about 260 GB on a multi-GPU server, with inclusionAI's own runtime branches or Transformers remote code. The main risks are running repository code to load it and no published safety results.", "bestFor": "Teams with a multi-GPU server who want Chinese and English transcription, audio understanding and spoken replies from one MIT model", "strengths": [ "MIT with no use policy, downloadable with no account or gate", "Transcription, audio question answering and spoken replies from one model, with 484 built-in voices and voice cloning", "Request and response format documented for its vLLM-Omni and SGLang servers, with example clients and streamed audio", "131,072-token context with no position scaling and thinking switched on per request", "Repository, examples and runtime branch updated daily up to 20 October 2026" ], "weaknesses": [ "259.3 GB of BF16 files and no quantised build, so it needs a multi-GPU server and doesn't fit 128 GB", "No named runtime runs it from released code, it needs inclusionAI's fork branches or trust_remote_code", "No hosted provider, so an agent without the hardware can't call it", "No safety results, training data, limitations or knowledge cut-off published", "No timestamps or JSON transcript output, and where reasoning text returns isn't documented" ], "agentNotes": [ "Start it with inclusionAI's recipe, `hf download inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash --local-dir inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash \u0026\u0026 export MODEL_PATH=\"$PWD/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash\" \u0026\u0026 pip install -r requirements-vllm-omni.txt \u0026\u0026 MING_OUTPUT_MODE=asr ./scripts/serve_vllm_omni.sh \"$MODEL_PATH\"`, run from a clone of github.com/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash", "The 128K profile uses tensor parallelism over eight 80 GB H800 GPUs, the SGLang profile four and SGLang-Omni's cookbook two. It doesn't fit the 107.4 GB reference machine", "Use `MING_OUTPUT_MODE=asr` with the validated prompt and greedy decoding for transcripts, and split the language label from the text at the tab", "Use `MING_OUTPUT_MODE=text` for audio questions and the Talker profile with `modalities=[\"text\", \"audio\"]` for spoken replies", "Send audio as a base64 data URL in an `audio_url` item for vLLM-Omni, or as `input_audio` for SGLang", "Pick a voice with `audio.voice` and an id, or clone one with `ref_audio` and its exact `prompt_text`, never both", "Turn thinking on per request with `chat_template_kwargs` `{\"enable_thinking\": true}`, it's off by default and the reasoning comes back in think tags", "Tool calls follow the template's `\u003ctool_call\u003e` with `\u003carg_key\u003e` and `\u003carg_value\u003e` pairs, and no parser is named, so parse them yourself", "Review the repository's Python and the talker/ code, .pyc files included, before loading with trust_remote_code" ], "metrics": { "kind": "local", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 4, "avgRating": 2.3, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "low", "grade": "E", "methodology": "0.6", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 42.5 } ], "editorialScores": { "interface": 65, "reach": 25, "risk": 50, "upkeep": 49 }, "provenanceScore": 57, "checked": { "categories": { "interface": "2026-10-21", "reach": "2026-10-21", "risk": "2026-10-21", "upkeep": "2026-10-21" }, "last": "2026-10-21", "oldest": "2026-10-21", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "# inclusionAI's recipe, from github.com/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash (eight 80 GB GPUs for 128K)\nhf download inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash --local-dir inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash\nexport MODEL_PATH=\"$PWD/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash\"\npip install -r requirements-vllm-omni.txt\nMING_OUTPUT_MODE=asr ./scripts/serve_vllm_omni.sh \"$MODEL_PATH\"", "http": "python examples/vllm_omni_audio_chat.py examples/audio/introduce_ant_group.wav \\\n --task asr \\\n --prompt 'Please recognize the language of this speech and transcribe it, placing a `\\t` between the identified language and the transcribe.' \\\n --max-tokens 256 --no-repeat-ngram-size 10" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/speech.stt", "tool": "https://letme.dev/ming-3-0-audio-flash" }, "sameCompany": [ "ming-3-0-asr-tiny", "ming-3-0-audio-tiny", "ming-3-0-tts-tiny", "ling-3-0-tiny" ], "weights": { "trainedBy": "inclusionAI (Ant Group)", "params": "126B", "active": "6.5B", "context": 131072, "goodFor": "Audio-language model for Chinese and English: speech to text, questions about audio and spoken replies.", "runtimes": [], "builds": [ { "name": "Ming-3.0-audio-flash", "url": "https://huggingface.co/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash", "who": "publisher", "precision": "bf16", "sizeGB": 259.3, "memoryGB": 512, "format": "safetensors", "note": "Main checkpoint 256.4 GB plus the Talker and VAE 3.0 GB" } ], "run": "hf download inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash --local-dir inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash \u0026\u0026 export MODEL_PATH=\"$PWD/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash\" \u0026\u0026 pip install -r requirements-vllm-omni.txt \u0026\u0026 MING_OUTPUT_MODE=asr ./scripts/serve_vllm_omni.sh \"$MODEL_PATH\"", "runBuild": "Ming-3.0-audio-flash", "checked": "2026-10-21", "minMemoryGB": 512 }, "family": { "lab": "inclusionAI (Ant Group)", "family": "Ming 3.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/open-weights/#inclusionai", "others": [ { "name": "Ming-3.0-tts-0.5B", "url": "https://huggingface.co/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-tts-0.5B", "params": "0.5B (dense)", "listing": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ming-3-0-tts-0-5b" }, { "name": "Ming-3.0-tts-tiny", "url": "https://huggingface.co/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-tts-tiny", "params": "7.9B total, about 1.3B active (backbone)", "listing": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ming-3-0-tts-tiny" }, { "name": "Ming-3.0-audio-tiny", "url": "https://huggingface.co/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-tiny", "params": "9.3B total, 2.7B active", "listing": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ming-3-0-audio-tiny" }, { "name": "Ming-3.0-asr-tiny", "url": "https://huggingface.co/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-asr-tiny", "params": "not stated on the card (Hub metadata counts 8,865,800,992 in the files)", "listing": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ming-3-0-asr-tiny" } ], "olderCount": 54 }, "alsoIn": [ "voice-agents" ], "area": "voice", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "inclusionAI, Ant Group (named in the inclusion-ai.org footer; no registered company named)", "domain": "inclusion-ai.org", "domainRegistered": "2025-04-03", "endpointOnVendorDomain": null, "terms": "", "privacy": "", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://github.com/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash/commits/main", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-10-21", "notes": [ "inclusion-ai.org (inclusionai.github.io redirects there) describes inclusionAI as founded by Ant Group and links its Hugging Face and GitHub organisations. Its footer reads © 2026 inclusionAI, Ant Group. RDAP gives the domain's registration as 3 April 2025.", "Nothing is hosted, so the MIT licence stands in for terms of service and no privacy policy is scored.", "The changelog is the GitHub repository's commit history, whose messages mostly say what changed (a vLLM-Omni fix branch, voice selection, deployment profiles). The Hugging Face history mixes these with card layout edits.", "inclusion-ai.org/.well-known/security.txt answers with the site's 404 page, so there is none.", "Ant Group runs a company-wide security response centre, AntSRC (https://security.alipay.com/, read on 21 October 2026). Nothing on inclusionAI's card or sites links it." ], "score": 57 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ming-3-0-audio-flash.json" }, "answer": "Underdog Bark 3.0 scores 48.2 (D) on agent readiness against Ming-3.0-audio-flash's 42.5 (E), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Ming-3.0-audio-flash leads on risk and agent interface.", "b": { "slug": "underdog-bark-3", "name": "Underdog Bark 3.0", "vendor": "Conway Research", "vendorUrl": "https://conway.tech", "kind": "weights", "category": "speech-to-text", "summary": "Underdog Bark 3.0 is Conway Research's open-weight English speech recognition model, a post-trained and compressed Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 in one 163 MB file, run with Conway's loader on Transformers, MLX or Core ML, under CC BY 4.0.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/underdog-bark-3", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/underdog-bark-3.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/underdog-bark-3.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/underdog-bark-3.json", "repo": "https://huggingface.co/ConwayResearch/Underdog-Bark-3.0", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "transports": [], "packages": [ { "registry": "huggingface", "name": "ConwayResearch/Underdog-Bark-3.0" } ], "auth": "none", "authNotes": "The files download from Hugging Face with no account, token or terms to accept. The repository isn't gated (checked 2026-10-21). The card's optional line about `hf auth login` applies only if access ever needs it.", "pricing": "free", "pricingNotes": "Free to download and use, commercial use included, under CC BY 4.0, which asks for attribution of NVIDIA, Moondream and Conway (the repository's NOTICE file). Running it costs the hardware. model.bark is 163.4 MB, and the Core ML packages about 0.2 GB each (checked 2026-10-21).", "priceSummary": "Free", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "Weights you download and run yourself, so there is nothing to pay per call and no payment protocol (checked 2026-10-21).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-10-21" }, "docsUrl": "https://huggingface.co/ConwayResearch/Underdog-Bark-3.0", "capabilities": [ "speech.stt", "speech.batch", "model.open-weights" ], "tags": [ "open-weights", "model", "speech-to-text", "asr", "english", "fastconformer", "tdt", "parakeet", "low-bit", "mlx", "core-ml", "apple-silicon", "on-device", "cc-by-4.0", "self-hosted" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-15", "graded": true, "disclosure": "Underdog Bark 3.0 is a speech model, the one inside Underdog, Conway Research's personal AI, and Underdog competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published open-weight checklist as every open-weight model, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default. underdog.ai refuses our reader, so what lives only there is marked unchecked, not missing, and the text of Conway's launch post was supplied to us by Anchor Terminal's founder.", "competesWith": "localghost", "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 48.2, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 0, "ranked": false, "notRankedWhy": "An open-weight model, graded by the open-weight checklist and ranked among open-weight models, not against tools", "rankOf": 1197, "categoryRank": 23, "methodology": "0.6", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "interface": 35, "reach": 65, "risk": 40, "upkeep": 49 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "low", "date": "2026-10-21" }, "negative": -2, "negativeNotes": [ "A misleading claim, 2 off. Conway's launch post of 21 October 2026, whose text Anchor Terminal's founder supplied because underdog.ai refuses our reader, calls Underdog Bark 3.0 'the #1 frontier speech model'. The Open ASR Leaderboard shows that false on every reading the post's own words allow, even granting Conway's own 4.937 per cent average over the seven public English sets its card uses, which isn't on the leaderboard. As the best speech model, 32 of the leaderboard's 65 rows average lower on those sets. As the best open model, 16 open-weight rows do, led by Hojo-ASR-V1 at 4.291. On AMI, the set the post cites, 19 rows score below its 7.82. And at its own size in the leaderboard's size column, two open models do better, Parakeet TDT 0.6B v2 (0.6B, 4.819) and Granite Speech 5.0 470M NC (0.47B, 4.921). Conway's card claims only state of the art for its size, measured by download, which the leaderboard can't test and is recorded as Conway's claim. 2, the low end of the range, because the card states the narrower position and the post reached us as supplied text (https://huggingface.co/datasets/hf-audio/open-asr-leaderboard-results/raw/main/english_short_latest.csv, results file last changed 19 October 2026)" ], "verdict": "A very small English transcription cousin, one 163 MB file built on NVIDIA's Parakeet TDT that Conway's loader expands into Transformers, MLX or Core ML, under CC BY 4.0. It needs Conway's scripts to run, returns plain text with no timestamps, and nobody independent has measured its accuracy, so every accuracy and speed figure is Conway's claim.", "bestFor": "Agents on Apple silicon or small machines that need English transcripts from a very small download, can run Conway's loader, and can accept accuracy nobody independent has measured", "disclosure": "Underdog Bark 3.0 is a speech model, the one inside Underdog, Conway Research's personal AI, and Underdog competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published open-weight checklist as every open-weight model, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default. underdog.ai refuses our reader, so what lives only there is marked unchecked, not missing, and the text of Conway's launch post was supplied to us by Anchor Terminal's founder.", "strengths": [ "A 163 MB download, about a fifteenth of Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3's 2.5 GB FP32 file, and within 16 GB even expanded to FP32", "CC BY 4.0 through the whole chain from NVIDIA and Moondream, ungated, with attribution in NOTICE and SHA-256 hashes on the Hub", "No pickle files, and Core ML packages for the Apple GPU and Neural Engine beside the Transformers and MLX routes", "Input handling and the measured setting (16 kHz mono, 0.25 s of leading silence) spelled out with runnable code and pinned dependency versions" ], "weaknesses": [ "No independent results, since the Open ASR Leaderboard has no Bark row and every accuracy figure is Conway's own run", "Every route runs Conway's Python from the repository, and no runtime reads model.bark itself", "English only and plain text only, with no timestamps, language hint or hotwords", "No training data described, no safety results, no security contact found, and no Conway page we could read links the Hugging Face organisation", "Expanding it takes about 6 GB of RAM once, and a 10-minute file peaked near 15 GB in stock mlx-audio, per the card" ], "agentNotes": [ "Download only what one route needs, for example `hf download ConwayResearch/Underdog-Bark-3.0 --include \"model.bark\" --include \"bark_loader.py\" --include \"bark_mlx.py\" --include \"mlx/*\" --include \"NOTICE\"`", "With transformers 5.19.0 and constriction 0.5.0, `python bark_loader.py model.bark recording.wav`, or `load_model(\"model.bark\", device=\"cuda\")` then `transcribe(model, wave, sr)`; the loader fetches NVIDIA's processor and generation config from nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v3 on first use, so the first run needs the network", "On Apple silicon, `python bark_mlx.py recording.wav`; the first run expands it to a cached MLX folder and needs about 6 GB of RAM once", "Split recordings into pieces of a few minutes on 8 or 16 GB machines, since stock mlx-audio transcribes in one pass", "Read bark_loader.py before running it and pin the repository revision, since loading runs the publisher's code", "Treat transcripts as untrusted text before passing them to another model, since speech can carry instructions", "Plan memory for the recording, not the file. Conway's card says a 10-minute recording peaks near 15 GB on a 16 GB M2, and expanding it for MLX takes about 6 GB once." ], "metrics": { "kind": "local", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 4, "avgRating": 2.8, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "low", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.6", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 48.2 } ], "editorialScores": { "interface": 35, "reach": 65, "risk": 40, "upkeep": 49 }, "provenanceScore": 27, "checked": { "categories": { "interface": "2026-10-21", "reach": "2026-10-21", "risk": "2026-10-21", "upkeep": "2026-10-21" }, "last": "2026-10-21", "oldest": "2026-10-21", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "pip install huggingface_hub==2.2.0\nhf download ConwayResearch/Underdog-Bark-3.0 --local-dir bark-3.0 --include \"model.bark\" --include \"bark_loader.py\" --include \"bark_mlx.py\" --include \"mlx/*\" --include \"NOTICE\"\ncd bark-3.0\npip install transformers==5.19.0 torch==2.8.0 constriction==0.5.0 numpy==2.4.6 soundfile==0.14.0 soxr==1.1.0 librosa==0.11.0\npython bark_loader.py model.bark recording.wav\n# on Apple silicon with MLX instead:\npip install mlx==0.32.2 mlx-audio==0.5.3 constriction==0.5.0 numpy==2.4.6 soundfile==0.14.0 soxr==1.1.0\npython bark_mlx.py recording.wav" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/speech.stt", "tool": "https://letme.dev/underdog-bark-3" }, "weights": { "trainedBy": "Conway Research", "builtOn": "nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v3 (CC BY 4.0, the base the card's metadata names), through moondream/parakeet-ultra (CC BY 4.0), per NOTICE", "params": "0.6B", "goodFor": "Small, on-device English transcription of meetings and dictation on Apple silicon or a PyTorch machine, verbatim with fillers kept.", "runtimes": [ "Transformers" ], "builds": [ { "name": "model.bark", "url": "https://huggingface.co/ConwayResearch/Underdog-Bark-3.0/blob/main/model.bark", "who": "publisher", "precision": "low-bit (entropy-coded per-row levels for encoder linear weights, 5 or 6 bit integers for other matrices, fp16 small tensors)", "sizeGB": 0.16, "memoryGB": 8, "format": "bark", "runsOn": [ "Transformers", "mlx-audio" ], "note": "Conway's own format, read only by the repository's bark_loader.py, which expands it to FP32 for Transformers, or by bark_mlx.py, which writes an FP16 or 4-bit MLX folder for mlx-audio. About 2.1 bits a parameter as stored, entropy-coded; the bit width isn't stated The band comes from the file size, as for every build. Conway's card says expanding it for MLX takes about 6 GB once and a 10-minute recording peaks near 15 GB on a 16 GB M2, so long recordings need more than the band." }, { "name": "Core ML (Apple GPU)", "url": "https://huggingface.co/ConwayResearch/Underdog-Bark-3.0/tree/main/coreml/gpu", "who": "publisher", "precision": "the same quantised values as model.bark, FP16 encoder arithmetic", "sizeGB": 0.2, "memoryGB": 8, "format": "coreml", "runsOn": [ "Core ML" ], "note": "BarkEncoder.mlpackage with a fixed 15-second window, decoder.npz and vocab.json, run by coreml/gpu/bark_coreml.py" }, { "name": "Core ML (Apple Neural Engine)", "url": "https://huggingface.co/ConwayResearch/Underdog-Bark-3.0/tree/main/coreml/ane", "who": "publisher", "precision": "the same quantised values as model.bark, FP16 encoder arithmetic", "sizeGB": 0.2, "memoryGB": 8, "format": "coreml", "runsOn": [ "Core ML" ], "note": "BarkEncoder.mlpackage with 8 and 15 second functions sharing weights, decoder.npz and vocab.json, run by coreml/ane/bark_coreml.py" } ], "run": "python bark_loader.py model.bark recording.wav", "runBuild": "model.bark", "checked": "2026-10-21", "minMemoryGB": 8 }, "family": { "lab": "Conway Research", "family": "Underdog Bark", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/open-weights/#conway" }, "area": "voice", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "", "domain": "conway.tech", "domainRegistered": "2025-11-08", "endpointOnVendorDomain": null, "terms": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en", "privacy": "", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://huggingface.co/ConwayResearch/Underdog-Bark-3.0/commits/main", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-10-21", "notes": [ "The model sits in the ConwayResearch organisation on Hugging Face, named Conway and unverified, whose Bark 3.0 commits both come from the Hugging Face account of Sigil Wen, whom sigilwen.ca/conway names as Conway's founder. conway.tech (page and script), sigilwen.ca/conway and Conway-Research/automaton's README don't link the organisation, and underdog.ai, which the card links, refuses our reader, so a link from Conway's own site is unchecked.", "No registered company name found, as in the Underdog listing of 3 October 2026. The Hugging Face organisation and conway.tech both say Conway. RDAP gives conway.tech a registration date of 8 November 2025 (rechecked 21 October 2026).", "Nothing is hosted for this listing, so the licence stands in for terms of service and no privacy policy is scored.", "The changelog is the commit history, two commits on 15 October 2026 (initial commit and Underdog Bark 3.0). No release notes outside underdog.ai were found.", "conway.tech/.well-known/security.txt answered 404 on 21 October 2026, and the repository has no security file. underdog.ai is unchecked." ], "score": 27 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/underdog-bark-3.json" }, "facts": [ { "a": "Open-weight model", "b": "Open-weight model", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "inclusionAI (Ant Group)", "b": "Conway Research", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "no (local only)", "b": "no (local only)", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "None", "b": "None", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Free", "b": "Free", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "MIT", "b": "CC-BY-4.0", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "2026-10-20", "b": "2026-10-15", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "no document linked", "b": "", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "no document linked", "b": "no document linked", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "2.3/5 (4)", "b": "2.8/5 (4)", "name": "Agent reviews" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "Underdog Bark 3.0 scores 48.2 (D) on agent readiness against Ming-3.0-audio-flash's 42.5 (E), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Ming-3.0-audio-flash leads on risk and agent interface.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, Ming-3.0-audio-flash or Underdog Bark 3.0?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Risk, 50 against 40", "Agent interface, 65 against 35" ], "also": null, "goodFor": "Teams with a multi-GPU server who want Chinese and English transcription, audio understanding and spoken replies from one MIT model", "slug": "ming-3-0-audio-flash", "watchFor": "259.3 GB of BF16 files and no quantised build, so it needs a multi-GPU server and doesn't fit 128 GB" }, { "aheadOn": [ "Reach, 65 against 25" ], "also": [ "Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.8 against 2.3 out of 5" ], "goodFor": "Agents on Apple silicon or small machines that need English transcripts from a very small download, can run Conway's loader, and can accept accuracy nobody independent has measured", "slug": "underdog-bark-3", "watchFor": "No independent results, since the Open ASR Leaderboard has no Bark row and every accuracy figure is Conway's own run" } ], "job": { "capability": "speech.stt", "name": "Speech-to-text" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-transcribe-03-2026-vs-ming-3-0-audio-flash.json", "title": "Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Ming-3.0-audio-flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-transcribe-03-2026-vs-ming-3-0-audio-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-transcribe-03-2026-vs-underdog-bark-3.json", "title": "Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Underdog Bark 3.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-transcribe-03-2026-vs-underdog-bark-3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-ming-3-0-audio-flash.json", "title": "Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Ming-3.0-audio-flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-ming-3-0-audio-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-underdog-bark-3.json", "title": "Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Underdog Bark 3.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-underdog-bark-3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-ming-3-0-audio-tiny.json", "title": "Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Ming-3.0-audio-tiny", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-ming-3-0-audio-tiny" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-nemotron-3-5-asr-streaming-0-6b.json", "title": "Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-nemotron-3-5-asr-streaming-0-6b" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning.json", "title": "Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-parakeet-tdt-0-6b-v3.json", "title": "Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-parakeet-tdt-0-6b-v3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-qwen3-asr-0-6b.json", "title": "Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Qwen3-ASR-0.6B", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-qwen3-asr-0-6b" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-qwen3-asr-1-7b.json", "title": "Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-qwen3-asr-1-7b" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-qwen3-omni-30b-a3b-instruct.json", "title": "Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-qwen3-omni-30b-a3b-instruct" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-voxtral-mini-4b-realtime-2602.json", "title": "Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-voxtral-mini-4b-realtime-2602" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-underdog-bark-3.json", "title": "Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Underdog Bark 3.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-underdog-bark-3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nemotron-3-5-asr-streaming-0-6b-vs-underdog-bark-3.json", "title": "Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B vs Underdog Bark 3.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nemotron-3-5-asr-streaming-0-6b-vs-underdog-bark-3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning-vs-underdog-bark-3.json", "title": "Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Underdog Bark 3.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning-vs-underdog-bark-3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/parakeet-tdt-0-6b-v3-vs-underdog-bark-3.json", "title": "Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 vs Underdog Bark 3.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/parakeet-tdt-0-6b-v3-vs-underdog-bark-3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-asr-0-6b-vs-underdog-bark-3.json", "title": "Qwen3-ASR-0.6B vs Underdog Bark 3.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-asr-0-6b-vs-underdog-bark-3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-asr-1-7b-vs-underdog-bark-3.json", "title": "Qwen3-ASR-1.7B vs Underdog Bark 3.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-asr-1-7b-vs-underdog-bark-3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-omni-30b-a3b-instruct-vs-underdog-bark-3.json", "title": "Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Underdog Bark 3.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-omni-30b-a3b-instruct-vs-underdog-bark-3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/underdog-bark-3-vs-voxtral-mini-4b-realtime-2602.json", "title": "Underdog Bark 3.0 vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/underdog-bark-3-vs-voxtral-mini-4b-realtime-2602" } ], "scores": [ { "key": "capability", "name": "Capability", "pending": true, "weight": 35 }, { "by": 40, "edge": "underdog-bark-3", "key": "reach", "ming-3-0-audio-flash": 25, "name": "Reach", "underdog-bark-3": 65, "weight": 25 }, { "by": 10, "edge": "ming-3-0-audio-flash", "key": "risk", "ming-3-0-audio-flash": 50, "name": "Risk", "underdog-bark-3": 40, "weight": 20 }, { "by": 30, "edge": "ming-3-0-audio-flash", "key": "interface", "ming-3-0-audio-flash": 65, "name": "Agent interface", "underdog-bark-3": 35, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 0, "edge": "", "key": "upkeep", "ming-3-0-audio-flash": 49, "name": "Documentation and upkeep", "underdog-bark-3": 49, "weight": 10 } ], "summary": "Underdog Bark 3.0 scores 48.2 (D) on agent readiness against Ming-3.0-audio-flash's 42.5 (E), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Ming-3.0-audio-flash leads on risk and agent interface. Both do speech-to-text.", "tutorials": [], "verdicts": { "ming-3-0-audio-flash": "Ming-3.0-audio-flash is a cousin for Chinese and English transcription, questions about long audio and spoken replies in built-in or cloned voices, under MIT. It needs about 260 GB on a multi-GPU server, with inclusionAI's own runtime branches or Transformers remote code. The main risks are running repository code to load it and no published safety results.", "underdog-bark-3": "A very small English transcription cousin, one 163 MB file built on NVIDIA's Parakeet TDT that Conway's loader expands into Transformers, MLX or Core ML, under CC BY 4.0. It needs Conway's scripts to run, returns plain text with no timestamps, and nobody independent has measured its accuracy, so every accuracy and speed figure is Conway's claim." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-underdog-bark-3", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-underdog-bark-3.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-underdog-bark-3.md", "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-underdog-bark-3.min.md" }, "markdown": "Underdog Bark 3.0 scores 48.2 (D) on agent readiness against Ming-3.0-audio-flash's 42.5 (E), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Ming-3.0-audio-flash leads on risk and agent interface. Both do speech-to-text.\n\n- Ming-3.0-audio-flash: grade E, 42.5/100, rank #98 of 100 open-weight models. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ming-3-0-audio-flash.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/ming-3-0-audio-flash.json\n- Underdog Bark 3.0: grade D, 48.2/100, rank #96 of 100 open-weight models. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/underdog-bark-3.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/underdog-bark-3.json\n- Best speech-to-text APIs for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/speech-to-text/index.md\n- All 231 stt comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/speech-to-text/index.md\n- Best conversational voice-agent APIs: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/voice-agents/index.md\n- All 388 voice agents comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/voice-agents/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### Ming-3.0-audio-flash (E)\n\nGood for: Teams with a multi-GPU server who want Chinese and English transcription, audio understanding and spoken replies from one MIT model\n\nAhead on:\n- Risk, 50 against 40\n- Agent interface, 65 against 35\n\nWatch for: 259.3 GB of BF16 files and no quantised build, so it needs a multi-GPU server and doesn't fit 128 GB\n\n### Underdog Bark 3.0 (D)\n\nGood for: Agents on Apple silicon or small machines that need English transcripts from a very small download, can run Conway's loader, and can accept accuracy nobody independent has measured\n\nAhead on:\n- Reach, 65 against 25\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.8 against 2.3 out of 5\n\nWatch for: No independent results, since the Open ASR Leaderboard has no Bark row and every accuracy figure is Conway's own run\n\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Ming-3.0-audio-flash | Underdog Bark 3.0 | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Capability | 35%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Reach | 25% (25 this run) | 25 | 65 | Underdog Bark 3.0 +40 |\n| Risk | 20% (20 this run) | 50 | 40 | Ming-3.0-audio-flash +10 |\n| Agent interface | 10% (10 this run) | 65 | 35 | Ming-3.0-audio-flash +30 |\n| Documentation and upkeep | 10% (10 this run) | 49 | 49 | even |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |\n| **Total** | | **42.5 · E** | **48.2 · D** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Ming-3.0-audio-flash | Underdog Bark 3.0 |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |\n| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | Conway Research |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |\n| Transports | | |\n| Auth | None | None |\n| Pricing | Free | Free |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | MIT | CC-BY-4.0 |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | no |\n| llms.txt | no | no |\n| Last release | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-15 |\n| Terms last updated | no document linked | |\n| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |\n| Customer content may train models | | |\n| Terms restrict automated access | | |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | | |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | | |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | | |\n| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Ming-3.0-audio-flash.** Ming-3.0-audio-flash is a cousin for Chinese and English transcription, questions about long audio and spoken replies in built-in or cloned voices, under MIT. It needs about 260 GB on a multi-GPU server, with inclusionAI's own runtime branches or Transformers remote code. The main risks are running repository code to load it and no published safety results.\n\n**Underdog Bark 3.0.** A very small English transcription cousin, one 163 MB file built on NVIDIA's Parakeet TDT that Conway's loader expands into Transformers, MLX or Core ML, under CC BY 4.0. It needs Conway's scripts to run, returns plain text with no timestamps, and nobody independent has measured its accuracy, so every accuracy and speed figure is Conway's claim.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Ming-3.0-audio-flash\n\n1. Start it with inclusionAI's recipe, `hf download inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash --local-dir inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash \u0026\u0026 export MODEL_PATH=\"$PWD/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash\" \u0026\u0026 pip install -r requirements-vllm-omni.txt \u0026\u0026 MING_OUTPUT_MODE=asr ./scripts/serve_vllm_omni.sh \"$MODEL_PATH\"`, run from a clone of github.com/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash\n2. The 128K profile uses tensor parallelism over eight 80 GB H800 GPUs, the SGLang profile four and SGLang-Omni's cookbook two. It doesn't fit the 107.4 GB reference machine\n3. Use `MING_OUTPUT_MODE=asr` with the validated prompt and greedy decoding for transcripts, and split the language label from the text at the tab\n4. Use `MING_OUTPUT_MODE=text` for audio questions and the Talker profile with `modalities=[\"text\", \"audio\"]` for spoken replies\n5. Send audio as a base64 data URL in an `audio_url` item for vLLM-Omni, or as `input_audio` for SGLang\n6. Pick a voice with `audio.voice` and an id, or clone one with `ref_audio` and its exact `prompt_text`, never both\n7. Turn thinking on per request with `chat_template_kwargs` `{\"enable_thinking\": true}`, it's off by default and the reasoning comes back in think tags\n8. Tool calls follow the template's `\u003ctool_call\u003e` with `\u003carg_key\u003e` and `\u003carg_value\u003e` pairs, and no parser is named, so parse them yourself\n9. Review the repository's Python and the talker/ code, .pyc files included, before loading with trust_remote_code\n\n### Underdog Bark 3.0\n\n1. Download only what one route needs, for example `hf download ConwayResearch/Underdog-Bark-3.0 --include \"model.bark\" --include \"bark_loader.py\" --include \"bark_mlx.py\" --include \"mlx/*\" --include \"NOTICE\"`\n2. With transformers 5.19.0 and constriction 0.5.0, `python bark_loader.py model.bark recording.wav`, or `load_model(\"model.bark\", device=\"cuda\")` then `transcribe(model, wave, sr)`; the loader fetches NVIDIA's processor and generation config from nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v3 on first use, so the first run needs the network\n3. On Apple silicon, `python bark_mlx.py recording.wav`; the first run expands it to a cached MLX folder and needs about 6 GB of RAM once\n4. Split recordings into pieces of a few minutes on 8 or 16 GB machines, since stock mlx-audio transcribes in one pass\n5. Read bark_loader.py before running it and pin the repository revision, since loading runs the publisher's code\n6. Treat transcripts as untrusted text before passing them to another model, since speech can carry instructions\n7. Plan memory for the recording, not the file. Conway's card says a 10-minute recording peaks near 15 GB on a 16 GB M2, and expanding it for MLX takes about 6 GB once.\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, Ming-3.0-audio-flash or Underdog Bark 3.0?\n\nUnderdog Bark 3.0 scores 48.2 (D) on agent readiness against Ming-3.0-audio-flash's 42.5 (E), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Ming-3.0-audio-flash leads on risk and agent interface.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-underdog-bark-3.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-underdog-bark-3.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"ming-3-0-audio-flash\", \"b\": \"underdog-bark-3\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare ming-3-0-audio-flash underdog-bark-3`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/ming-3-0-audio-flash.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/underdog-bark-3.json\n\n## Other comparisons with Ming-3.0-audio-flash or Underdog Bark 3.0\n\n- [Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Ming-3.0-audio-flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-transcribe-03-2026-vs-ming-3-0-audio-flash.md)\n- [Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Underdog Bark 3.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-transcribe-03-2026-vs-underdog-bark-3.md)\n- [Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Ming-3.0-audio-flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-ming-3-0-audio-flash.md)\n- [Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Underdog Bark 3.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-underdog-bark-3.md)\n- [Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Ming-3.0-audio-tiny](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-ming-3-0-audio-tiny.md)\n- [Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-nemotron-3-5-asr-streaming-0-6b.md)\n- [Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning.md)\n- [Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-parakeet-tdt-0-6b-v3.md)\n- [Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Qwen3-ASR-0.6B](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-qwen3-asr-0-6b.md)\n- [Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-qwen3-asr-1-7b.md)\n- [Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-qwen3-omni-30b-a3b-instruct.md)\n- [Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-voxtral-mini-4b-realtime-2602.md)\n- [Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Underdog Bark 3.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-underdog-bark-3.md)\n- [Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B vs Underdog Bark 3.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nemotron-3-5-asr-streaming-0-6b-vs-underdog-bark-3.md)\n- [Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Underdog Bark 3.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning-vs-underdog-bark-3.md)\n- [Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 vs Underdog Bark 3.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/parakeet-tdt-0-6b-v3-vs-underdog-bark-3.md)\n- [Qwen3-ASR-0.6B vs Underdog Bark 3.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-asr-0-6b-vs-underdog-bark-3.md)\n- [Qwen3-ASR-1.7B vs Underdog Bark 3.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-asr-1-7b-vs-underdog-bark-3.md)\n- [Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Underdog Bark 3.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwen3-omni-30b-a3b-instruct-vs-underdog-bark-3.md)\n- [Underdog Bark 3.0 vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/underdog-bark-3-vs-voxtral-mini-4b-realtime-2602.md)\n\n## Disclosure\n\n- Underdog Bark 3.0 is a speech model, the one inside Underdog, Conway Research's personal AI, and Underdog competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published open-weight checklist as every open-weight model, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default. underdog.ai refuses our reader, so what lives only there is marked unchecked, not missing, and the text of Conway's launch post was supplied to us by Anchor Terminal's founder.\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-10-21", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.6", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Underdog Bark 3.0", "url": "" } ], "description": "Underdog Bark 3.0 scores 48.2 (D) to Ming-3.0-audio-flash's 42.5 (E) for speech-to-text. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "Ming-3.0-audio-flash E 42.5", "Underdog Bark 3.0 D 48.2", "scores" ], "h1": "Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Underdog Bark 3.0", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/compare-ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-underdog-bark-3.png", "path": "/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-underdog-bark-3", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Underdog Bark 3.0 for AI agents (2026)", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-10-21", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-underdog-bark-3" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 3000, "slim": 480 }, "version": 1 }