# MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Muse Glimmer 30B (slim)

> Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) to MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL's 61 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-rl-vs-muse-glimmer-30b.md (~10,050 tokens) · this version ~830 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-rl-vs-muse-glimmer-30b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-rl-vs-muse-glimmer-30b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL's 61 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL: C 61, rank #75 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mimo-v2-6-flash-rl.min.md
- Muse Glimmer 30B: BB 70, rank #7 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/muse-glimmer-30b.min.md
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL, good for Teams with a GPU server, or a provider account, that want an open agent model with a very long context Ahead on Agent interface, 85 against 75.
- Muse Glimmer 30B, good for Local agents and coding with image input on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or an Apple silicon laptop, where one tool call per turn is enough Ahead on Reach, 90 against 65; Risk, 80 against 45; Documentation and upkeep, 65 against 59. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better.

| Category | MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL | Muse Glimmer 30B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 65 | 90 |
| Risk (20%) | 45 | 80 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 85 | 75 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 59 | 65 |

| Fact (where they differ) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL | Muse Glimmer 30B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Xiaomi (MiMo team) | Meta |
| Licence | MIT (metadata only, no LICENSE file) | Apache-2.0 |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-28 | 2026-10-20 |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.8/5 (4) |

Why the edge:
- Risk, Muse Glimmer 30B +35: MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL 45 (File safety 5, the weights are safetensors, but the dflash folder's mask_embedding.pt is a pickle beside them (15).); Muse Glimmer 30B 80 (File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF, with the ExecuTorch pos_embed.bin files read as raw embedding tables by their exact size and the Hub's scans, and no repos…)
- Reach, Muse Glimmer 30B +25: MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL 65 (Memory 5, the smallest build at 4 bits or better is ggml-org's MXFP4 GGUF, 168.93 GB with its projector, and 168.93 GB × 1.2 = 202.7 GB, within 256 GB.); Muse Glimmer 30B 90 (Memory 25, Meta's 16.8 GB Q4_K_M GGUF needs about 20 GB with the runtime's fifth, so it fits a 24 GB card but not 16 GB.)
- Agent interface, MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL +10: MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL 85 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (3,868 characters), with a copy in tokenizer_config.json.); Muse Glimmer 30B 75 (Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository.)
- Documentation and upkeep, Muse Glimmer 30B +6: MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL 59 (Model card 14, Intended use, the architecture, the parameters, the context and the languages (in the metadata) are on the card.); Muse Glimmer 30B 65 (Model card 20, all seven parts present, languages as a count of more than 100. Training data 10, a general description with a 4 January 2026 cut-off and no sour…)