# MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B (slim)

> MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B and MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 61 and 61 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-distill-qwen-9b-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b.md (~10,200 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-distill-qwen-9b-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-distill-qwen-9b-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B and MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B leads on reach and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B: C 61, rank #47 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mimo-v2-6-distill-qwen-9b.min.md
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B: C 61, rank #77 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b.min.md
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B, good for Researchers and agents that want a small coding and terminal-agent model to fine-tune further on a 24 GB GPU, or to run at 4-bit through Ollama in about 8 GB. Ahead on Risk, 65 against 55.
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B, good for Agents that need to read screenshots, documents and video on a local machine with 24 to 32 GB for the model, under a permissive licence Ahead on Reach, 90 against 80; Documentation and upkeep, 68 against 40.

| Category | MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 80 | 90 |
| Risk (20%) | 65 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 70 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 40 | 68 |

| Fact (where they differ) | MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Xiaomi (MiMo team) | OpenBMB |
| Licence | MIT (metadata only, no LICENSE file); built on Qwen3.5-9B under Apache 2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | 2026-11-03 |
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | none |

Why the edge:
- Documentation and upkeep, MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +28: MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B 40 (Model card 5 of 20, intended use and parameters only.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 68 (Model card 8, it covers intended use, architecture and parameters but not limitations, context length, languages or a knowledge cut-off.)
- Reach, MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +10: MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B 80 (Memory 30 of 30, Ollama's library build at q4_K_M is 6.6 GB, 7.9 GB with a fifth added, while Xiaomi's only build is BF16 at 18.85 GB.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 90 (Memory 25, since OpenBMB's IQ4_XS GGUF with its vision projector is 19.6 GB and needs about 23.6 GB with the fifth added, which fits 24 GB, while its Q4_K_M GGU…)
- Risk, MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B +10: MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B 65 (File safety 25, safetensors only and no repository code runs.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 55 (File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only, no Python in the main repository and no remote code needed.)