# MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B (slim)

> MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B and MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 61 and 61 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-distill-qwen-9b-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-1b.md (~10,200 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-distill-qwen-9b-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-1b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-distill-qwen-9b-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-1b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B and MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B leads on reach and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B: C 61, rank #47 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mimo-v2-6-distill-qwen-9b.min.md
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B: C 61, rank #76 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-1b.min.md
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B, good for Researchers and agents that want a small coding and terminal-agent model to fine-tune further on a 24 GB GPU, or to run at 4-bit through Ollama in about 8 GB. Ahead on Risk, 65 against 55.
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B, good for Agents that need a cheap local model to read screenshots, photos and short video on a phone, a laptop or beside a bigger model Ahead on Reach, 95 against 80; Documentation and upkeep, 48 against 40.

| Category | MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 80 | 95 |
| Risk (20%) | 65 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 70 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 40 | 48 |

| Fact (where they differ) | MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Xiaomi (MiMo team) | OpenBMB |
| Licence | MIT (metadata only, no LICENSE file); built on Qwen3.5-9B under Apache 2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | 2026-10-30 |
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | none |

Why the edge:
- Reach, MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +15: MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B 80 (Memory 30 of 30, Ollama's library build at q4_K_M is 6.6 GB, 7.9 GB with a fifth added, while Xiaomi's only build is BF16 at 18.85 GB.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 95 (Memory 30, OpenBMB's own IQ4_XS GGUF is 0.64 GB, 1.54 GB with the 0.90 GB vision projector, and 1.54 GB × 1.2 = 1.9 GB, which fits 16 GB with room to spare.)
- Risk, MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B +10: MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B 65 (File safety 25, safetensors only and no repository code runs.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 55 (File safety 25, safetensors in the main repository and the AWQ, GPTQ and int4 builds, GGUF in the GGUF build, with no .bin, .pt, .pth or .py files in the main r…)
- Documentation and upkeep, MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +8: MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B 40 (Model card 5 of 20, intended use and parameters only.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 48 (Model card 8, Intended use (image, multi-image and video understanding on device), architecture (early visual-token compression inside the vision encoder) and p…)