# Microsoft Execution Containers vs Together Code Sandbox (slim)

> Microsoft Execution Containers scores 76.3 (BB) on agent readiness against Together Code Sandbox's 53.6 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Together Code Sandbox leads on schema & documentation. Both do sandbox code. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side…

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/microsoft-execution-containers-vs-together-code-sandbox.md (~2,950 tokens) · this version ~830 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/microsoft-execution-containers-vs-together-code-sandbox.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/microsoft-execution-containers-vs-together-code-sandbox
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

Microsoft Execution Containers scores 76.3 (BB) on agent readiness against Together Code Sandbox's 53.6 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Together Code Sandbox leads on schema & documentation. Both do sandbox code.

- Microsoft Execution Containers: BB 76.3, rank #35 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/microsoft-execution-containers.min.md
- Together Code Sandbox: D 53.6, rank #628 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/together-code-sandbox.min.md
- Microsoft Execution Containers, good for A developer building an agent or tool host that must run model-written code on the user's own machine, above all on Windows, where it reaches Microsoft's process and session isolation. Ahead on Reliability, 81 against 25; Security & auth, 69 against 47; Payments & pricing, 60 against 20; Maintenance & community, 92 against 83; Transparency & trust, 83 against 60. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better; No key needed to call it; Free to start without a card; Open source.
- Together Code Sandbox, good for Teams already buying from Together, and former CodeSandbox SDK users, who want Docker-defined sandboxes with disk and memory snapshots from Python or TypeScript. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 86 against 81. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install.

| Category | Microsoft Execution Containers | Together Code Sandbox |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 81 | 25 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 81 | 86 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 74 | 70 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 69 | 47 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 20 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 92 | 83 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 83 | 60 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Microsoft Execution Containers | Together Code Sandbox |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | SDK + MCP | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Microsoft | Together AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://api.bartender.codesandbox.io` |
| Transports |  | HTTP |
| Auth | None | API key |
| Pricing | Free | Pay per use |
| Licence | MIT | Proprietary service under Together's terms of service. The SDKs, CLI and OpenAPI documents on GitHub are MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-06 | 2026-10-07 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | no date given |
| Customer content may train models |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking |  | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice |  | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |  | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 1.5k stars, 472k npm/wk | 3 stars, 1.3k npm/wk, 3.4k PyPI/wk |