# Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Graph workbook API) vs Teable (slim)

> Teable scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Graph workbook API)'s 58.5 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Graph workbook API) leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics and transparency & trust. Both do…

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/microsoft-excel-graph-vs-teable.md (~2,650 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/microsoft-excel-graph-vs-teable.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/microsoft-excel-graph-vs-teable
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

Teable scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Graph workbook API)'s 58.5 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Graph workbook API) leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics and transparency & trust. Both do sheets read.

- Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Graph workbook API): C 58.5, rank #450 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/microsoft-excel-graph.min.md
- Teable: C 61, rank #379 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/teable.min.md
- Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Graph workbook API), good for Agents working on .xlsx files that already live in a Microsoft 365 tenant, and for using Excel's calculation engine through function endpoints. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 85 against 75; Agent ergonomics, 73 against 65; Transparency & trust, 75 against 64.
- Teable, good for Teams that want Airtable-style typed tables on PostgreSQL that they can also self-host, with an agent reading and writing records through tokens limited by scope and project, or through the vendor's CLI and skill. Ahead on Reliability, 72 against 62; Payments & pricing, 30 against 15; Maintenance & community, 76 against 53. Also Open source.

| Category | Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Graph workbook API) | Teable |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 62 | 72 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 85 | 75 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 73 | 65 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 65 | 62 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 15 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 53 | 76 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 75 | 64 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Graph workbook API) | Teable |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Microsoft | Teable AI, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0` | `https://app.teable.ai/api` |
| Auth | OAuth | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Your plan | Freemium |
| Licence | MIT (SDKs) | AGPL-3.0 with additional brand terms for the backend and web app, MIT for the packages directory. Enterprise functions and the `@teable/cli` package (ISC on npm) are built in a private repository |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2025-09-19 | 2026-10-06 |
| Terms last updated | 2025-10-01 | 2026-05-25 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-01 | 2026-10-01 |
| Customer content may train models | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |
| Popularity | 835 stars, 2.9M npm/wk, 1.6M PyPI/wk | 22k stars, 179 npm/wk |