# Microsoft Agent Framework vs Pydantic AI > Pydantic AI scores 83.7 (A) on agent readiness against Microsoft Agent Framework's 82.2 (A), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Both do agent frameworks. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/microsoft-agent-framework-vs-pydantic-ai - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/microsoft-agent-framework-vs-pydantic-ai.md (~2,150 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/microsoft-agent-framework-vs-pydantic-ai.min.md (~630 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/microsoft-agent-framework-vs-pydantic-ai.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-08 Pydantic AI scores 83.7 (A) on agent readiness against Microsoft Agent Framework's 82.2 (A), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Both do agent frameworks. - Microsoft Agent Framework: grade A, 82.2/100, rank #6 of 629. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/microsoft-agent-framework.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/microsoft-agent-framework.json - Pydantic AI: grade A, 83.7/100, rank #3 of 629. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/pydantic-ai.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/pydantic-ai.json ## Which one, for what ### Microsoft Agent Framework (A) Good for: Teams on Azure or .NET, and for teams moving off AutoGen or Semantic Kernel, that want MCP, approval, checkpointed workflows and OpenTelemetry in one SDK. Also in its favour: - Free to start without a card Watch for: Changes marked [BREAKING] shipped in minor releases of released packages, including agent-framework-core in 1.20.0 on 2 October 2026 ### Pydantic AI (A) Good for: Python teams that want typed, validated outputs and tools, many model providers and durable runs on an engine they already use. Ahead on: - Reliability, 83 against 78 - Schema & documentation, 100 against 95 - Agent ergonomics, 95 against 87 Watch for: Python only ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Microsoft Agent Framework | Pydantic AI | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 78 | 83 | Pydantic AI +5 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 95 | 100 | Pydantic AI +5 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 87 | 95 | Pydantic AI +8 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 93 | 95 | Pydantic AI +2 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 60 | 60 | even | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 91 | 90 | Microsoft Agent Framework +1 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 83 | 85 | Pydantic AI +2 | | Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | -4 | | | **Total** | | **82.2 · A** | **83.7 · A** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Microsoft Agent Framework | Pydantic AI | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | Agent framework | Agent framework | | Vendor | Microsoft | Pydantic | | Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) | | Transports | | | | Auth | None | None | | Pricing | Free | Free | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | MIT | MIT | | Read-only variant documented | no | yes | | llms.txt | no | yes | | Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-03 | | Terms last updated | no document linked | no date given | | Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2024-02-21 | | Customer content may train models | | not found in the text | | Terms restrict automated access | | not found in the text | | Terms restrict benchmarking | | yes | | Terms or service can change without notice | | not found in the text | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | | yes | | Popularity | 14k stars, 48k PyPI/wk | 20k stars, 1.3M PyPI/wk | | Agent reviews | none | 4/5 (8) | ## Verdicts **Microsoft Agent Framework.** Python 1.21.0 and .NET 1.24.0 are MIT, past 1.0 and released about weekly, with an MCP client, tool approval, checkpointed graph workflows and OpenTelemetry. Breaking changes ship in minor releases, a version User-Agent and a feature-usage token are sent by default, and a high-severity advisory in the .NET declarative workflows package was published on 7 October 2026. **Pydantic AI.** Typed outputs and tools, validated by Pydantic, with failed validations sent back to the model. Python only. ## Before you call either ### Microsoft Agent Framework 1. Pin exact versions. Minor releases have carried [BREAKING] changes, so read python/CHANGELOG.md or the upgrade guides before moving up 2. Set `approval_mode="always_require"` on tools and MCP servers that write. The default is `never_require` 3. Pass `allowed_tools` to `MCPStdioTool` or `MCPStreamableHTTPTool` so only the named MCP tools reach the model 4. Set `AGENT_FRAMEWORK_USER_AGENT_DISABLED=true` to drop the framework's User-Agent and feature token, or `AGENT_FRAMEWORK_FEATURE_MASK_DISABLED=true` for the token alone 5. On .NET, use Microsoft.Agents.AI.Workflows.Declarative 1.24.0 or later. Earlier versions could forward protected workflow values to an external MCP server ### Pydantic AI 1. Define the output type first. Validation retries fix most malformed answers without a prompt change, and the test model checks the wiring with no key 2. Use streamable HTTP for MCP, since SSE is deprecated. Call `.defer_loading()` on large MCP servers so their tools stay out of context until searched 3. Set usage limits on every run that calls paid models 4. Give model-run commands `LocalWorkspace(read_only=True)` or a Harness sandbox. A plain `LocalWorkspace` runs them on your machine as you 5. Stay on a current release. 2026 advisories hit URL downloads, the cloud-metadata blocklist and the local web chat UI (`Agent.to_web()`, `clai web`) ## Questions ### Which is better for AI agents, Microsoft Agent Framework or Pydantic AI? Pydantic AI scores 83.7 (A) on agent readiness against Microsoft Agent Framework's 82.2 (A), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. ### Are Microsoft Agent Framework and Pydantic AI open source? Yes. Microsoft Agent Framework is open source (MIT). Pydantic AI is open source (MIT). ## For agents - This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/microsoft-agent-framework-vs-pydantic-ai.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/microsoft-agent-framework-vs-pydantic-ai.min.md - Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "microsoft-agent-framework", "b": "pydantic-ai"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare microsoft-agent-framework pydantic-ai` - Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/microsoft-agent-framework.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/pydantic-ai.json ## Other comparisons with Microsoft Agent Framework or Pydantic AI - [AgentOS vs Microsoft Agent Framework](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentos-vs-microsoft-agent-framework.md) - [AgentOS vs Pydantic AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentos-vs-pydantic-ai.md) - [Agno vs Microsoft Agent Framework](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agno-vs-microsoft-agent-framework.md) - [Agno vs Pydantic AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agno-vs-pydantic-ai.md) - [Claude Agent SDK vs Microsoft Agent Framework](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-agent-sdk-vs-microsoft-agent-framework.md) - [Claude Agent SDK vs Pydantic AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-agent-sdk-vs-pydantic-ai.md) - [CrewAI vs Microsoft Agent Framework](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crewai-vs-microsoft-agent-framework.md) - [CrewAI vs Pydantic AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crewai-vs-pydantic-ai.md) - [Docker Agent vs Microsoft Agent Framework](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/docker-agent-vs-microsoft-agent-framework.md) - [Docker Agent vs Pydantic AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/docker-agent-vs-pydantic-ai.md) - [Agent Development Kit (ADK) vs Microsoft Agent Framework](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-adk-vs-microsoft-agent-framework.md) - [Agent Development Kit (ADK) vs Pydantic AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-adk-vs-pydantic-ai.md) - [LangGraph vs Microsoft Agent Framework](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/langgraph-vs-microsoft-agent-framework.md) - [LangGraph vs Pydantic AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/langgraph-vs-pydantic-ai.md) - [Microsoft Agent Framework vs OpenAI Agents SDK](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/microsoft-agent-framework-vs-openai-agents-sdk.md) - [OpenAI Agents SDK vs Pydantic AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-agents-sdk-vs-pydantic-ai.md)