# Make API + MCP vs Prismatic

> Prismatic and Make score within a point of each other for workflow automation, 59.1 and 58.7 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-prismatic
- Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-prismatic.md (~2,300 tokens)
- Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-prismatic.min.md (~730 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts)
- JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-prismatic.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json)
- Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt)
- API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json
- Updated: 2026-10-09

Prismatic and Make API + MCP score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 59.1 (C) and 58.7 (C). Make API + MCP leads on security & auth, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do workflow automation.

- Make API + MCP: grade C, 58.7/100, rank #573 of 950. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/make.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/make.json
- Prismatic: grade C, 59.1/100, rank #561 of 950. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/prismatic.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/prismatic.json
- Best workflow automation platforms with APIs for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/workflow-automation/index.md
- All 108 workflows comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/workflow-automation/index.md

## Which one, for what

### Make API + MCP (C)

Good for: Teams who build in a visual editor and want an agent to run those scenarios as tools, cloud only.

Ahead on:
- Security & auth, 68 against 59
- Payments & pricing, 30 against 0
- Transparency & trust, 72 against 65

Also in its favour:
- Free to start without a card

Watch for: No published OpenAPI file and no official SDK

### Prismatic (C)

Good for: A B2B software company that wants to build integrations once, deploy them per customer and let an in-app agent call them as MCP tools.

Ahead on:
- Schema & documentation, 75 against 66
- Maintenance & community, 83 against 36

Also in its favour:
- Runs on your own machine

Watch for: No prices on the pricing page. All three plans end in a demo request


## Score by category

| Category | Weight | Make API + MCP | Prismatic | Edge |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 63 | 67 | Prismatic +4 |
| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 66 | 75 | Prismatic +9 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 63 | 63 | even |
| Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 68 | 59 | Make API + MCP +9 |
| Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 30 | 0 | Make API + MCP +30 |
| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 36 | 83 | Prismatic +47 |
| Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 72 | 65 | Make API + MCP +7 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| **Total** | | **58.7 · C** | **59.1 · C** | |

## Facts side by side

| Fact | Make API + MCP | Prismatic |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Make (Celonis) | Prismatic Software Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://eu1.make.com/api/v2` | `https://mcp.prismatic.io/mcp` |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | proprietary | Proprietary service. The Prism CLI, the Spectral and embedded SDKs, the Prism MCP dev server and the Claude Code skills on GitHub are MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | `com.make/mcp-server` | `io.github.prismatic-io/prism-mcp` |
| Last release | none | 2026-10-06 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | 2024-06-26 |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read |  |
| Popularity | none | 29 stars, 8.4k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | none |

## Verdicts

**Make API + MCP.** Hosted MCP server with OAuth, and scenario run tools on the free plan. No published OpenAPI file and no official SDK.

**Prismatic.** The GraphQL API covers 120 queries and 124 mutations with typed inputs, cursor pagination and Markdown documentation, and tokens follow seven user roles. No price is published, paid use runs under an agreement that is not public, and no API rate limit or idempotency key was found in the reviewed documentation.

## Before you call either

### Make API + MCP

1. Find the organisation's zone first. It may be on make.com or make.celonis.com
2. Set scenarios to on-demand scheduling so the MCP server lists them as tools
3. Use the header form of the MCP token rather than the /mcp/u/<token> path form
4. On a 429, wait a full minute. The limit resets per minute and no Retry-After is sent
5. Check the `code` field on errors. IM002 means the token lacks rights, not that the resource is missing

### Prismatic

1. Have a person run `prism login` once, then store the output of `prism me:token --type refresh` as `PRISM_REFRESH_TOKEN`. Access tokens last 7 days
2. Read the `errors` array on every mutation. A failed mutation still returns HTTP 200
3. Pass `sortBy` with `CREATED_AT` when paging. Without a sort order pages can repeat or skip records
4. Use the regional host for the tenant, such as `app.eu-west-1.prismatic.io` and `mcp.eu-west-1.prismatic.io`
5. Create a guest user for a read-only agent, because tokens have no scopes of their own

## Questions

### Which is better for AI agents, Make API + MCP or Prismatic?

Prismatic and Make API + MCP score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 59.1 (C) and 58.7 (C). Make API + MCP leads on security & auth, payments & pricing and transparency & trust.

### Do Make API + MCP and Prismatic need an API key?

Make API + MCP takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Prismatic uses an OAuth sign-in.

### Can an agent call Make API + MCP and Prismatic without installing anything?

Yes. Make API + MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://eu1.make.com/api/v2 and Prismatic at https://mcp.prismatic.io/mcp.


## For agents

- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-prismatic.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-prismatic.min.md
- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "make", "b": "prismatic"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare make prismatic`
- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/make.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/prismatic.json

## Other comparisons with Make API + MCP or Prismatic

- [Activepieces API + MCP vs Make API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-make.md)
- [Activepieces API + MCP vs Prismatic](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-prismatic.md)
- [Gumloop vs Make API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gumloop-vs-make.md)
- [Gumloop vs Prismatic](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gumloop-vs-prismatic.md)
- [Kestra vs Make API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kestra-vs-make.md)
- [Kestra vs Prismatic](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kestra-vs-prismatic.md)
- [Make API + MCP vs n8n API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-n8n.md)
- [Make API + MCP vs Node-RED](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-node-red.md)
- [Make API + MCP vs Paragon ActionKit + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-paragon.md)
- [Make API + MCP vs Pipedream API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-pipedream.md)
- [Make API + MCP vs Microsoft Power Automate](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-power-automate.md)
- [Make API + MCP vs Tray.ai API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-tray.md)
- [Make API + MCP vs Windmill API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-windmill.md)
- [Make API + MCP vs Workato API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-workato.md)
- [n8n API + MCP vs Prismatic](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/n8n-vs-prismatic.md)
- [Node-RED vs Prismatic](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/node-red-vs-prismatic.md)
- [Pipedream API + MCP vs Prismatic](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/pipedream-vs-prismatic.md)
- [Microsoft Power Automate vs Prismatic](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/power-automate-vs-prismatic.md)
- [Prismatic vs Tray.ai API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prismatic-vs-tray.md)
- [Prismatic vs Windmill API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prismatic-vs-windmill.md)
- [Prismatic vs Workato API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prismatic-vs-workato.md)
- [Paragon ActionKit + MCP vs Prismatic](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paragon-vs-prismatic.md)