# MailPace vs Zoho CPaaS (formerly ZeptoMail) (slim)

> MailPace and Zoho CPaaS score within a point of each other for sending email, 58.4 and 58.2 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mailpace-vs-zoho-zeptomail.md (~5,800 tokens) · this version ~3,530 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mailpace-vs-zoho-zeptomail.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mailpace-vs-zoho-zeptomail
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-07
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

MailPace and Zoho CPaaS (formerly ZeptoMail) score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 58.4 (C) and 58.2 (C). Zoho CPaaS (formerly ZeptoMail) leads on schema & documentation, security & auth, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do sending email.

- MailPace: C 58.4, rank #754 of 1510 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mailpace.min.md
- Zoho CPaaS (formerly ZeptoMail): C 58.2, rank #759 of 1510 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/zoho-zeptomail.min.md
- MailPace, good for Low-volume transactional mail from EU-hosted infrastructure with idempotent sends and no tracking. Ahead on Reliability, 70 against 41; Agent ergonomics, 71 against 55; Maintenance & community, 65 against 44.
- Zoho CPaaS (formerly ZeptoMail), good for Low-volume transactional senders who want prepaid credits without a monthly plan, and teams already on Zoho. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 78 against 54; Security & auth, 78 against 50; Payments & pricing, 30 against 25; Transparency & trust, 82 against 75. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install.

| Category | MailPace | Zoho CPaaS (formerly ZeptoMail) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 70 | 41 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 54 | 78 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 71 | 55 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 50 | 78 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 25 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 65 | 44 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 75 | 82 |

| Fact (where they differ) | MailPace | Zoho CPaaS (formerly ZeptoMail) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | OhMySMTP Ltd | Zoho Corporation |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://cpaas.zoho.com/v1.1` |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Pay per use |
| Licence | none | Proprietary service under the Zoho CPaaS terms of use. The Node SDK on npm is MIT |
| Tools exposed | 12 | none |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-22 | 2026-09-28 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-01-09 | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-08-30 | 2025-12-22 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 1 stars, 207 npm/wk | 40k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.8/5 (4) |

Why the edge:
- Reliability, MailPace +29: MailPace 70 (Graded with the hosted lines. A public Upptime status page at status.mailpace.com, driven by the mailpace/status repository, with monitors for the application, SMTP, docs, blog and landing page and GitHub issues as incident reports (20). The 90 days from 8 August hold two incidents, an application outage on 22 September 2026 that the operator put down to an upstream provider returning 5xx (issue open for two minutes), and SMTP down on 2 November 2026 for about 35 minutes, which leaves SMTP at 99.65% for the week. Minor incidents only (20). No rate limit numbers are published; the docs say limits vary by organisation age, plan and history (0). A documented 429 with its message, no Retry-After or backoff guidance, and an `Idempotency-Key` on sends with written retry rules (10 of 15). The terms guarantee 99% monthly availability of the API and dashboard with a 5% credit per 30 minutes (10). The API is at v1 with no beta label (10). Total 70.); Zoho CPaaS (formerly ZeptoMail) 41 (Graded on the hosted email API with the hosted lines. Zoho's status site at us.zohostatus.com listed three Zepto Mail components with status and incident history sections on 8 October, and status.zoho.com points there; the line is kept as for zoho-desk and zoho-crm (20). On 2 November the host answered robots.txt with a 404 carrying an error page ("We have encountered a problem while executing your request"), read as blocked as for the other Zoho listings, so nothing else was requested. The 8 October RSS reading (last status change 29 July 2026) is struck, and no history in the window was read (5). No request rate limit was found. The docs give payload caps (500 addresses a field, 60 attachments, 15 MB each), a per-day sending limit error (SMI_115) and the sandbox allowance of 10,000 emails a day (6). No 429 handling, Retry-After or idempotency key found in the docs or the error-code table (0). No SLA found (0). The email channel is generally available, while SMS, WhatsApp and voice are marked beta (10).)
- Security & auth, Zoho CPaaS (formerly ZeptoMail) +28: MailPace 50 (Per-domain server tokens that can only send from and read status for their domain, and an organisation token that creates, renames and revokes domain tokens through the Domains API. Tokens travel in headers only. The authentication page still tells users to contact support to regenerate a leaked token (25 of 30). No read-only token. A domain token can't touch other domains, and the unpublished MCP server has an optional recipient allowlist. No approval step on the hosted API (8 of 20). Inbound mail reaches the customer's webhook as untrusted content, and Email Status returns bounce text. The MCP README warns about prompt injection and suggests the allowlist (9 of 15). The dashboard keeps sent mail for 30 days; no log of API calls was found (6 of 15). No security.txt (404 on mailpace.com and app.mailpace.com), no disclosure policy, bug bounty, SOC 2 or ISO 27001. WebAuthn-only two-factor sign-in and Ed25519-signed webhooks are documented (2 of 20). Total 50.); Zoho CPaaS (formerly ZeptoMail) 78 (Send keys are per Agent and per channel, can be created, listed and deleted by API, and can only send and upload attachments. Management calls use Zoho OAuth 2.0 with READ, CREATE, UPDATE and DELETE scopes per resource and one-hour access tokens. That earns 30, less 10 because the OAuth guide documents the client secret and refresh token in the token URL's query string (20). Read-only scopes, send-only keys, sandbox Agents and IP allow lists for sending, the REST API and the web console. No approval step for deletes (15). No inbound mail, so responses hold only the account's own logs and settings (10). Activity logs per user kept one year with export, and email logs for 60 days that show the triggering IP (13). security.txt valid until 30 June 2028 naming security@zohocorp.com and Zoho's bug bounty, and SOC 2 Type II and ISO/IEC 27001 on Zoho's compliance page, the same evidence zoho-crm, zoho-desk and zoho-books score 20 on. The 2 points held back on 8 October for no advisory feed aren't a checklist condition the other Zoho listings apply (20).)
- Schema & documentation, Zoho CPaaS (formerly ZeptoMail) +24: MailPace 54 (No OpenAPI or other machine-readable contract for the HTTPS API. The MCP server's 12 tools have typed zod inputs and output schemas, but that server isn't published yet, so partial credit (8 of 25). llms.txt answers 404 on mailpace.com and docs.mailpace.com, and no Markdown copies are served (0). The reference states what each endpoint does, and the introduction says when not to use it (transactional only, no batch, no static IPs) (12 of 20). Field tables give type, examples and required or optional, with enums for status, sort and direction and the 50-recipient cap in text (9 of 15). Examples in curl and six languages and a full table of error responses with messages, though several listed messages have a broken quote (`{"error:"...`) and the send reference says 30 MB where the home page says 25 MB (12 of 15). Version in the path with a promise that an old version runs until a published end-of-life date, and dated changelog posts (13 of 15). Total 54.); Zoho CPaaS (formerly ZeptoMail) 78 (One public OpenAPI 3.0.3 file with 42 operations, linked from the docs without a login (25). llms.txt at zoho.com/cpaas/llms.txt and a second for the help centre, with a Markdown copy of each page (10). Every operation has a description, most of them one sentence, with nothing on when not to use it (10). Request bodies name required fields and length caps, with 9 enums across the file, but log filters take dates as free strings and responses are typed as a bare JSON object (10). Sample requests and responses on every page and an error-code table of 24 rows with remedies. The 401 body we got from the live endpoint has a different shape from the documented sample (11). Version 1.1 in the path and a What's New page dated by month only (12). The OpenAPI file was not re-read on 2 November (a permission check refused the request); the line rests on the 8 October reading.)
- Maintenance & community, MailPace +21: MailPace 65 (Email Status API documented on 22 October 2026, and the MCP server rewritten as 2.0.0 on 4 November 2026, two days before this check (30). In the 90 days from 8 August, the Q3 changelog post of 31 August, the Email Status docs of 22 October, a mailpace-rails push on 17 October and the MCP rewrite, but only one changelog post (15 of 20). A closed service with email support. Three pull requests to the MCP repository from 2025 have no reply (8 of 15). Not in the official MCP registry (search for mailpace returned nothing on 6 November). The Node library was last pushed in October 2024 and Go in January 2024, while mailpace-rails is current (7 of 15). The MCP server gained CI with tests on 4 November; the older SDKs weren't checked for CI (5 of 10). Total 65.); Zoho CPaaS (formerly ZeptoMail) 44 (Every dated source found was checked. What's New dates entries by month and has nothing after September 2026 (the rename with SMS, WhatsApp and voice endpoints), which lies 33 to 63 days back, and month-only entries don't set recency inside the month. The official WordPress plugin (transmail on wordpress.org, by Zoho Mail) was last updated on 28 September 2026 at 3.3.4, 35 days back. The API help pages carry no dates. The getting-started and subscription help pages say "Last updated: October 22, 2026", but a revised help page shows no API change, so the stamp doesn't set recency (omnisend's reading, where a new operation did); counted, recency would be 30 and maintenance 54. So the last change is within 90 days, not shown within 30 (20, cause time). In the 90 days from 4 August, What's New has one entry for September and one for August (28 of whose 31 days fall inside), and the plugin's 3.3.4 counts half as a package release that doesn't change the service. The July entries have left the window. 2.5 is fewer than three (0, cause time). A public changelog, a support address and a contact page that says support runs around the clock. We saw no public forum replies (10). The Node SDK zeptomail 8.0.1 of 29 May 2026 per the 8 October check (npm not re-read), the only official SDK found (10). The npm package names no source repository, so CI and dependency health couldn't be read (4). 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 + 4 = 44.)
- Agent ergonomics, MailPace +16: MailPace 71 (Responses are small, the send returns an id and status and Email Status returns one email (18 of 25). Only the domains list takes `limit`, `offset`, `sort` and `direction`; there is no endpoint to list or search sent mail (8 of 20). Errors are JSON with a human message and an HTTP status for each case in the documented table, with no stable error codes (14 of 20). `Idempotency-Key` on sends, kept 24 hours per token, and failed validations are not stored so they can be retried. The MCP server marks send as not idempotent and revoke as destructive (18 of 20). A send needs from, to, a subject and a body; official libraries for Node, Rails, Go and PHP transports and an SMTP route (13 of 15). Total 71.); Zoho CPaaS (formerly ZeptoMail) 55 (Send responses are small, and the logs endpoint takes offset and limit, with no field selection (15). Thirteen filters on email logs, among them recipient, subject, date range, `client_reference` and bounce or delivery state (16). Errors carry a code, a sub-code and a message, and the docs pair each with a fix (16). No idempotency key and no guidance on retrying a send (0). A send needs only from, to and subject. The one official SDK found is for Node, and managing the account needs a second credential type (8).)
- Transparency & trust, Zoho CPaaS (formerly ZeptoMail) +7: MailPace 75 (Closed hosted service under terms that name OhMySMTP Ltd with its company number. The MCP server, SDKs, landing site and status page are MIT (18 of 30). The privacy policy (30 August 2026), the pricing page and the DPA agree on retention, 30 days in the dashboard and 7 more in backups, 37 days at most (25 of 30). The API reference promises an old version runs until a published end-of-life date, and the terms list dated changes. The terms also say changes apply immediately (8 of 20). Sub-processors listed with purpose and location, Freethought hosting in the EU, Hetzner backups in Germany, AppSignal in Amsterdam, Paddle in the UK and Tutanota in Germany (18 of 20). Total 69.); Zoho CPaaS (formerly ZeptoMail) 82 (Closed service with its own published terms of use, and an MIT Node SDK (20). Zoho's privacy policy of 22 December 2025 covers service data, and the CPaaS pages say content is stored only on opt-in for 60 days and logs for 60 days. The pages disagree on deletion. The GDPR page says account data is deleted within 24 hours of a 48-hour grace period, the privacy policy says a clean-up every six months with backups three months later, and the April 2026 changelog entry says content can be kept up to 50 days (18). The terms commit to a six-month deprecation period after a service announcement, with no dated notices to check it against (16). Six data centre regions are named with their hosts, and Zoho publishes a sub-processor directory by service that loads by script and that we couldn't read (15).)