# Mailows vs Robotomail (slim)

> Robotomail scores 69.8 (B) to Mailows's 55.3 (C) for agent inboxes. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mailows-vs-robotomail.md (~2,150 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mailows-vs-robotomail.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mailows-vs-robotomail
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-22
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Robotomail scores 69.8 (B) on agent readiness against Mailows's 55.3 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Mailows leads on security & auth. Both do agent inboxes.

- Mailows: C 55.3, rank #753 of 1199 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mailows.min.md
- Robotomail: B 69.8, rank #185 of 1199 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/robotomail.min.md
- Mailows, good for A small team or one developer who wants an agent mailbox on its own domain, a strict send allowlist and consent-scoped MCP access, plus ordinary webmail and IMAP for people. Ahead on Security & auth, 75 against 65.
- Robotomail, good for A developer who wants one mailbox per agent with replies as events, on a small fixed monthly price. Ahead on Reliability, 73 against 28; Schema & documentation, 90 against 70; Maintenance & community, 77 against 63; Transparency & trust, 73 against 58. Also Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 3.0 out of 5.

| Category | Mailows | Robotomail |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 28 | 73 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 70 | 90 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 75 | 72 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 75 | 65 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 35 | 35 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 63 | 77 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 58 | 73 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Mailows | Robotomail |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | DW Technology LLC | Tiny Bot Labs Limited |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.mailows.com/v1` | `https://api.robotomail.com/v1` |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted service under Mailows's terms of service (DW Technology LLC, New Mexico law). The webmail and the mail server are modified AGPL-3.0 programs whose source the terms promise; the portal, the API and the MCP server are closed | Proprietary service under Robotomail's terms of service. The five SDKs on GitHub are MIT |
| Tools exposed | 7 | 6 |
| MCP registry | `com.mailows/mailows` | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-19 | 2026-09-25 |
| Terms last updated |  | 2026-10-05 |
| Privacy policy last updated |  | 2026-09-01 |
| Customer content may train models |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking |  | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice |  | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |  | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 0 stars | 20 npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 3.5/5 (4) |