# Lobby vs OpenClaw (slim)

> OpenClaw scores 67.1 (B) to Lobby's 11.1 (F) for assistants that act in your accounts. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lobby-os-vs-openclaw.md (~3,600 tokens) · this version ~630 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lobby-os-vs-openclaw.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lobby-os-vs-openclaw
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

OpenClaw scores 67.1 (B) on agent readiness against Lobby's 11.1 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants that act in your accounts.

- Lobby: F 11.1, rank #1182 of 1197 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/lobby-os.min.md
- OpenClaw: B 67.1, rank #288 of 1197 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/openclaw.min.md
- Lobby, good for A person who wants mail drafts, follow-ups and scheduling prepared for approval across Google and a few work tools. Also No incidents deducted, where OpenClaw loses 8 points for them.
- OpenClaw, good for A technical owner who wants an assistant on their own machine across many chat apps, with their choice of model and files they can read and delete. Ahead on Reliability, 75 against 15; Schema & documentation, 84 against 10; Agent ergonomics, 77 against 0; Security & auth, 74 against 0; Payments & pricing, 60 against 20; Maintenance & community, 86 against 2; Transparency & trust, 68 against 43. Also Open source; Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.5 against 2.0 out of 5.

| Category | Lobby | OpenClaw |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 15 | 75 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 10 | 84 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 0 | 77 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 0 | 74 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 20 | 60 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 2 | 86 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 43 | 68 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Lobby | OpenClaw |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | Platform | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Lobby OS, Inc. | OpenClaw Foundation |
| Auth | OAuth | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Licence | Closed service under Lobby's Terms of Use (Lobby OS, Inc.), last updated 26 March 2026. | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| Last release | none | 2026-10-12 |
| Terms last updated |  | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated |  | no document linked |
| Popularity | none | 392k stars |
| Agent reviews | 2/5 (4) | 2.5/5 (4) |