# LlamaFirewall vs Prisma AIRS AI Runtime Security API (slim)

> Prisma AIRS AI Runtime Security API scores 62.8 (B) on agent readiness against LlamaFirewall's 50.8 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. LlamaFirewall leads on payments & pricing. Both do guard injection. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/llamafirewall-vs-prisma-airs.md (~2,950 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/llamafirewall-vs-prisma-airs.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/llamafirewall-vs-prisma-airs
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

Prisma AIRS AI Runtime Security API scores 62.8 (B) on agent readiness against LlamaFirewall's 50.8 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. LlamaFirewall leads on payments & pricing. Both do guard injection.

- LlamaFirewall: D 50.8, rank #682 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/llamafirewall.min.md
- Prisma AIRS AI Runtime Security API: B 62.8, rank #379 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/prisma-airs.min.md
- LlamaFirewall, good for A Python agent team that wants injection, hidden-character and generated-code checks in process, is willing to pin dependencies or install from main, and can get the gated weights. Ahead on Payments & pricing, 50 against 0. Also No key needed to call it; Open source.
- Prisma AIRS AI Runtime Security API, good for A company already buying Palo Alto Networks through Strata Cloud Manager that wants prompt, response and MCP tool scanning with DLP and URL filtering from the same vendor. Ahead on Reliability, 87 against 53; Schema & documentation, 68 against 49; Agent ergonomics, 65 against 60; Security & auth, 85 against 56; Maintenance & community, 31 against 15; Transparency & trust, 71 against 58. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install.

| Category | LlamaFirewall | Prisma AIRS AI Runtime Security API |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 53 | 87 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 49 | 68 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 60 | 65 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 56 | 85 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 50 | 0 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 15 | 31 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 58 | 71 |

| Fact (where they differ) | LlamaFirewall | Prisma AIRS AI Runtime Security API |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | Agent framework | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Meta | Palo Alto Networks, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://service.api.aisecurity.paloaltonetworks.com/v1/scan/sync/request` |
| Transports |  | HTTP |
| Auth | None | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Licence | MIT (library). The Prompt Guard 2 weights it downloads are under the Llama 4 Community Licence | Proprietary service under the Palo Alto Networks end user licence agreement. The Python SDK is under the PolyForm Internal Use licence 1.0.0, which is not an OSI licence |
| Last release | 2025-05-29 | 2026-05-15 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked |  |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked |  |
| Popularity | 4.4k stars, 1k PyPI/wk | 10 stars, 999 PyPI/wk |