# Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview (slim)

> Ling-3.1-flash-1019 scores 54.8 (C) to SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview's 46.8 (D) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019-vs-sensenova-loop-9b-preview.md (~10,350 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019-vs-sensenova-loop-9b-preview.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019-vs-sensenova-loop-9b-preview
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Ling-3.1-flash-1019 scores 54.8 (C) on agent readiness against SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview's 46.8 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Ling-3.1-flash-1019: C 54.8, rank #126 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ling-3-1-flash-1019.min.md
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview: D 46.8, rank #155 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/sensenova-loop-9b-preview.min.md
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019, good for Teams with a multi-GPU server that want an MIT-licensed flagship for long agent runs and coding Ahead on Reach, 60 against 40; Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 44.
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview, good for Researchers who want to study or fine-tune a looped transformer, more than agents that need a model to call today Ahead on Risk, 50 against 45.

| Category | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 | SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 60 | 40 |
| Risk (20%) | 45 | 50 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 60 | 60 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 56 | 44 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 | SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | SenseTime (SenseNova) |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | not read yet |

Why the edge:
- Reach, Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +20: Ling-3.1-flash-1019 60 (Memory 0, inclusionAI's only build is the FP8 release at 573.78 GB, × 1.2 = 688.5 GB, above 256 GB, and no runtime's library has a build.); SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview 40 (Memory 15, the only build is the safetensors set, 38.14 GB with its MTP head, since the Hub counts 9.41B of its parameters in F32. Runtimes 0, none of the six r…)
- Documentation and upkeep, Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +12: Ling-3.1-flash-1019 56 (Model card 11, Intended use (complex reasoning, multi-step tasks and agentic workflows), architecture, parameters (560B total, 25B active) and context (1M claim…); SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview 44 (Model card 14, Intended use, the architecture, the parameter counts, the training context and the languages (in the metadata) are on the card.)
- Risk, SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview +5: Ling-3.1-flash-1019 45 (File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25), less 10 because the card's documented vLLM command passes --trust-remote-code, which runs the…); SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview 50 (File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25).)