# Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next (slim)

> Qwen3-Coder-Next scores 57.6 (C) to Ling-3.1-flash-1019's 54.8 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019-vs-qwen3-coder-next.md (~10,300 tokens) · this version ~830 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019-vs-qwen3-coder-next.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Qwen3-Coder-Next scores 57.6 (C) on agent readiness against Ling-3.1-flash-1019's 54.8 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Ling-3.1-flash-1019 leads on documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Ling-3.1-flash-1019: C 54.8, rank #126 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ling-3-1-flash-1019.min.md
- Qwen3-Coder-Next: C 57.6, rank #107 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/qwen3-coder-next.min.md
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019, good for Teams with a multi-GPU server that want an MIT-licensed flagship for long agent runs and coding Ahead on Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 41.
- Qwen3-Coder-Next, good for Agents that want a local coding model for long tool-calling loops on a single 64 GB to 128 GB machine. Ahead on Reach, 85 against 60; Risk, 50 against 45; Agent interface, 75 against 60.

| Category | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 | Qwen3-Coder-Next |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 60 | 85 |
| Risk (20%) | 45 | 50 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 60 | 75 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 56 | 41 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Ling-3.1-flash-1019 | Qwen3-Coder-Next |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-11-04 | 2026-02-03 |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.8/5 (4) |

Why the edge:
- Reach, Qwen3-Coder-Next +25: Ling-3.1-flash-1019 60 (Memory 0, inclusionAI's only build is the FP8 release at 573.78 GB, × 1.2 = 688.5 GB, above 256 GB, and no runtime's library has a build.); Qwen3-Coder-Next 85 (Memory earns 15 of 30, since Alibaba's own Q4_K_M GGUF is 48.4 GB, about 58 GB with a fifth added, inside the 64 GB band, and LM Studio's MLX and Ollama's build…)
- Agent interface, Qwen3-Coder-Next +15: Ling-3.1-flash-1019 60 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (6,042 characters), which handles tools, the thinking switch and preserved reasoning.); Qwen3-Coder-Next 75 (The template ships in the repository (20).)
- Documentation and upkeep, Ling-3.1-flash-1019 +15: Ling-3.1-flash-1019 56 (Model card 11, Intended use (complex reasoning, multi-step tasks and agentic workflows), architecture, parameters (560B total, 25B active) and context (1M claim…); Qwen3-Coder-Next 41 (The card covers four of the seven items and misses limitations, languages and a cut-off (11).)
- Risk, Qwen3-Coder-Next +5: Ling-3.1-flash-1019 45 (File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25), less 10 because the card's documented vLLM command passes --trust-remote-code, which runs the…); Qwen3-Coder-Next 50 (Safetensors and GGUF only, with the two shipped parsers outside the documented loading path, gives file safety 25, and files in the Qwen organisation the publis…)