# Ling-3.0-tiny vs Spark-X2.6-4B (slim)

> Spark-X2.6-4B scores 61 (C) to Ling-3.0-tiny's 55 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ling-3-0-tiny-vs-spark-x2-6-4b.md (~6,150 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ling-3-0-tiny-vs-spark-x2-6-4b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ling-3-0-tiny-vs-spark-x2-6-4b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Spark-X2.6-4B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Ling-3.0-tiny's 55 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Ling-3.0-tiny leads on reach and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Ling-3.0-tiny: C 55, rank #81 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ling-3-0-tiny.min.md
- Spark-X2.6-4B: C 61, rank #48 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/spark-x2-6-4b.min.md
- Ling-3.0-tiny, good for Agents on a laptop or small GPU that want a fast local model for tool calls and short reasoning, under MIT Ahead on Reach, 90 against 85; Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 41.
- Spark-X2.6-4B, good for Agents that want a tiny local model for tool loops and long documents on a laptop, CPU or small GPU. Ahead on Agent interface, 70 against 60.

| Category | Ling-3.0-tiny | Spark-X2.6-4B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 90 | 85 |
| Risk (20%) | 50 | 50 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 60 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 56 | 41 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Ling-3.0-tiny | Spark-X2.6-4B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | SparkLLM (XHToken) |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-08-31 | 2026-10-20 |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |