# Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-0.8B (slim)

> Ling-3.0-tiny scores 55 (C) to Qwen3.5-0.8B's 46.7 (D) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ling-3-0-tiny-vs-qwen3-5-0-8b.md (~6,050 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ling-3-0-tiny-vs-qwen3-5-0-8b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ling-3-0-tiny-vs-qwen3-5-0-8b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Ling-3.0-tiny scores 55 (C) on agent readiness against Qwen3.5-0.8B's 46.7 (D), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3.5-0.8B leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Ling-3.0-tiny: C 55, rank #81 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ling-3-0-tiny.min.md
- Qwen3.5-0.8B: D 46.7, rank #97 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/qwen3-5-0-8b.min.md
- Ling-3.0-tiny, good for Agents on a laptop or small GPU that want a fast local model for tool calls and short reasoning, under MIT Ahead on Capability, 31 against 17; Reach, 90 against 80; Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 37.
- Qwen3.5-0.8B, good for Builders who want a near-free local helper or fine-tuning base for narrow tasks on a phone-class device, laptop or CPU Ahead on Risk, 55 against 50.

| Category | Ling-3.0-tiny | Qwen3.5-0.8B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | 31 | 17 |
| Reach (25%) | 90 | 80 |
| Risk (20%) | 50 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 60 | 60 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 56 | 37 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Ling-3.0-tiny | Qwen3.5-0.8B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-08-31 | 2026-03-02 |