# Lindy vs ZeroClaw (slim)

> ZeroClaw scores 70.2 (BB) to Lindy's 32.3 (F) for assistant proactive. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lindy-vs-zeroclaw.md (~2,550 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lindy-vs-zeroclaw.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lindy-vs-zeroclaw
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-12

ZeroClaw scores 70.2 (BB) on agent readiness against Lindy's 32.3 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistant proactive.

- Lindy: F 32.3, rank #968 of 986 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/lindy.min.md
- ZeroClaw: BB 70.2, rank #161 of 986 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/zeroclaw.min.md
- Lindy, good for Lindy suits a person or small team that lives in Slack and Google or Microsoft mail and wants briefs, drafts, scheduling and meeting notes done on a schedule.
- ZeroClaw, good for One person who wants an assistant on their own hardware that answers on Telegram, Discord, Matrix or email, asks before it writes or runs commands, and works with a local model. Ahead on Reliability, 74 against 24; Schema & documentation, 82 against 32; Agent ergonomics, 72 against 43; Security & auth, 76 against 49; Payments & pricing, 60 against 35; Maintenance & community, 80 against 9; Transparency & trust, 64 against 52. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better; No key needed to call it; Open source.

| Category | Lindy | ZeroClaw |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 24 | 74 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 32 | 82 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 43 | 72 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 49 | 76 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 35 | 60 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 9 | 80 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 52 | 64 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Lindy | ZeroClaw |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | Platform | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Crivello Corp (doing business as Lindy) | ZeroClaw Labs |
| Auth | OAuth | None |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Lindy's Terms of Service. No source is published | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| Last release | 2025-10-21 | 2026-09-05 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-09-24 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-28 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text |  |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes |  |
| Popularity | none | 33k stars |