# Laminar API + MCP vs Respan API + MCP

> Respan API + MCP has a score of 65.9 (B) against Laminar API + MCP's 57 (C). Both do obs traces. The largest gap is reliability, 23 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/laminar-vs-respan
- Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/laminar-vs-respan.md (~1,600 tokens)
- Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/laminar-vs-respan.min.md (~330 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts)
- JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/laminar-vs-respan.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json)
- Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt)
- API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json
- Updated: 2026-10-05

Respan API + MCP has a score of 65.9 (B) against Laminar API + MCP's 57 (C). Both do obs traces. The largest gap is reliability, 23 points.

- Laminar API + MCP: grade C, 57/100, rank #298 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/laminar.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/laminar.json
- Respan API + MCP: grade B, 65.9/100, rank #165 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/respan.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/respan.json

## Which one, for what

Pick Laminar API + MCP for agent ergonomics (+14), transparency & trust (+5).

Pick Respan API + MCP for reliability (+23), security & auth (+21).

## Score by category

| Category | Weight | Laminar API + MCP | Respan API + MCP | Edge |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 50 | 73 | Respan API + MCP +23 |
| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 88 | 89 | Respan API + MCP +1 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 80 | 66 | Laminar API + MCP +14 |
| Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 45 | 66 | Respan API + MCP +21 |
| Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 83 | 85 | Respan API + MCP +2 |
| Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 66 | 61 | Laminar API + MCP +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -5 | -2 | |
| **Total** | | **57 · C** | **65.9 · B** | |

## Facts side by side

| Fact | Laminar API + MCP | Respan API + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Laminar (LMNR AI) | Respan (formerly Keywords AI) |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.lmnr.ai/v1` | `https://api.respan.ai/api` |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 (SDKs only, platform closed source) |
| Tools exposed | 3 | 67 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-23 | 2026-09-30 |
| Popularity | 3.3k stars, 80k npm/wk, 1.7M PyPI/wk | 270 npm/wk, 13k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 2.5/5 (2) |

## Verdicts

**Laminar API + MCP.** Browser session recordings can be matched to agent traces. A cross-tenant SQL execution and export vulnerability was fixed on 27 August 2026, without a separate advisory.

**Respan API + MCP.** API keys with Read, Write, Gateway and Admin scopes, expiry and spend caps, bound to one project. 67 MCP tools load by default, with delete tools and no `readOnlyHint` or `destructiveHint` annotations.

## Before you call either

### Laminar API + MCP

1. Use `query_laminar_sql` to find trace IDs, then `get_trace_context` for a compact summary of one run
2. Always add a time range and `LIMIT` to SQL. Server caps on time, memory and result size reject wide scans
3. On 429 from the SQL API, back off. The per-project limit isn't published
4. Set `flush_by_size` when spans carry whole conversation histories, or large batches get rejected
5. Keep the project API key in a header, not in the URL

### Respan API + MCP

1. Create a key with only the Read scope for agents that analyse logs. New keys get Read, Write and Gateway by default
2. Set `Respan-Enabled-Tools` to a short list such as list_traces,get_trace_tree,list_logs. All 67 tools load otherwise
3. Pass `filters` to `list_logs` rather than paging through everything. The default window is the last hour
4. Call `list_organizations` first when results look empty over OAuth. Every tool acts on the active organisation only
5. Append `.md` to any docs URL for clean Markdown

## Other comparisons with Laminar API + MCP or Respan API + MCP

- [Arize Phoenix vs Laminar API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-laminar.md)
- [Arize Phoenix vs Respan API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-respan.md)
- [Baserun vs Laminar API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baserun-vs-laminar.md)
- [Baserun vs Respan API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baserun-vs-respan.md)
- [Braintrust API + MCP vs Laminar API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/braintrust-vs-laminar.md)
- [Braintrust API + MCP vs Respan API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/braintrust-vs-respan.md)
- [Galileo API + MCP vs Laminar API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/galileo-vs-laminar.md)
- [Galileo API + MCP vs Respan API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/galileo-vs-respan.md)
- [Helicone AI Gateway + MCP vs Laminar API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/helicone-vs-laminar.md)
- [Helicone AI Gateway + MCP vs Respan API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/helicone-vs-respan.md)
- [HoneyHive vs Laminar API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/honeyhive-vs-laminar.md)
- [HoneyHive vs Respan API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/honeyhive-vs-respan.md)
- [Laminar API + MCP vs Langfuse API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/laminar-vs-langfuse.md)
- [Laminar API + MCP vs LangSmith API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/laminar-vs-langsmith.md)
- [Langfuse API + MCP vs Respan API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/langfuse-vs-respan.md)
- [LangSmith API + MCP vs Respan API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/langsmith-vs-respan.md)