# Laguna M.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL (slim)

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL scores 61 (C) to Laguna M.1's 56.7 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/laguna-m-1-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash-rl.md (~9,250 tokens) · this version ~830 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/laguna-m-1-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash-rl.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/laguna-m-1-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash-rl
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Laguna M.1's 56.7 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Laguna M.1 leads on reach and risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Laguna M.1: C 56.7, rank #112 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/laguna-m-1.min.md
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL: C 61, rank #75 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mimo-v2-6-flash-rl.min.md
- Laguna M.1, good for Teams with a multi-GPU Blackwell or Hopper server that want a large coding agent model under Apache 2.0. Ahead on Reach, 70 against 65; Risk, 55 against 45.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL, good for Teams with a GPU server, or a provider account, that want an open agent model with a very long context Ahead on Documentation and upkeep, 59 against 36.

| Category | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 70 | 65 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 45 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 85 | 85 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 36 | 59 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Poolside | Xiaomi (MiMo team) |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT (metadata only, no LICENSE file) |
| Last release | 2026-07-14 | 2026-10-28 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-07-21 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-07-21 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | not read yet |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not read yet |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not read yet |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | none |

Why the edge:
- Documentation and upkeep, MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL +23: Laguna M.1 36 (Model card 11 of 20, intended use, architecture, parameters and context are there, limitations, languages and a cut-off aren't.); MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL 59 (Model card 14, Intended use, the architecture, the parameters, the context and the languages (in the metadata) are on the card.)
- Risk, Laguna M.1 +10: Laguna M.1 55 (File safety 15 of 25, safetensors only, but the repository ships model code behind auto_map and the card's SGLang and TensorRT-LLM instructions use trust_remote…); MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL 45 (File safety 5, the weights are safetensors, but the dflash folder's mask_embedding.pt is a pickle beside them (15).)
- Reach, Laguna M.1 +5: Laguna M.1 70 (Memory 5 of 30, the smallest 4-bit build is Poolside's 139.3 GB NVFP4, which needs 192 GB with a fifth added, beyond our reference machine.); MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL 65 (Memory 5, the smallest build at 4 bits or better is ggml-org's MXFP4 GGUF, 168.93 GB with its projector, and 168.93 GB × 1.2 = 202.7 GB, within 256 GB.)