# Kronos vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL (slim)

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL scores 61 (C) to Kronos's 55.2 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kronos-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash-rl.md (~8,950 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kronos-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash-rl.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kronos-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash-rl
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Kronos's 55.2 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Kronos leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Kronos: C 55.2, rank #122 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/kronos.min.md
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL: C 61, rank #75 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mimo-v2-6-flash-rl.min.md
- Kronos, good for Agents that need a quick local forecast or synthetic sample of a candlestick series on modest hardware, for research or as one input among others. Ahead on Risk, 50 against 45.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL, good for Teams with a GPU server, or a provider account, that want an open agent model with a very long context Ahead on Reach, 65 against 55; Agent interface, 85 against 60.

| Category | Kronos | MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 55 | 65 |
| Risk (20%) | 50 | 45 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 60 | 85 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 61 | 59 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Kronos | MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Yu Shi (shiyu-coder, NeoQuasar), Tsinghua University | Xiaomi (MiMo team) |
| Licence | MIT | MIT (metadata only, no LICENSE file) |
| Last release | 2026-04-13 | 2026-10-28 |
| Popularity | 43k stars | none |

Why the edge:
- Agent interface, MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL +25: Kronos 60 (Read for a forecasting model, the tool-calling, trained tool calling and structured-output lines stand for what it takes and returns.); MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL 85 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (3,868 characters), with a copy in tokenizer_config.json.)
- Reach, MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL +10: Kronos 55 (Memory 30, the publisher's Kronos-mini with its tokeniser is 0.03 GB and even Kronos-base is 0.43 GB in FP32. Runtimes 0, it runs only through the publisher's o…); MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL 65 (Memory 5, the smallest build at 4 bits or better is ggml-org's MXFP4 GGUF, 168.93 GB with its projector, and 168.93 GB × 1.2 = 202.7 GB, within 256 GB.)
- Risk, Kronos +5: Kronos 50 (File safety 15, safetensors only, but the only documented loading path is the publisher's Python package in place of a runtime.); MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL 45 (File safety 5, the weights are safetensors, but the dflash folder's mask_embedding.pt is a pickle beside them (15).)