# Kontent.ai vs Storyblok (slim)

> Kontent.ai scores 70.5 (BB) to Storyblok's 67.7 (B) for content management. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kontent-ai-vs-storyblok.md (~2,600 tokens) · this version ~830 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kontent-ai-vs-storyblok.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kontent-ai-vs-storyblok
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

Kontent.ai scores 70.5 (BB) on agent readiness against Storyblok's 67.7 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Storyblok leads on agent ergonomics, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do content management.

- Kontent.ai: BB 70.5, rank #153 of 950 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/kontent-ai.min.md
- Storyblok: B 67.7, rank #244 of 950 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/storyblok.min.md
- Kontent.ai, good for A company already on Kontent.ai, or evaluating it on a trial, that wants an agent to draft, localise, move through workflow and publish structured content with a permission-limited key and an audit trail. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 74 against 68; Security & auth, 81 against 73. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better; Runs on your own machine; No incidents deducted, where Storyblok loses 3 points for them.
- Storyblok, good for Teams already on Storyblok who want an agent to draft, translate and publish stories or change component schemas under scoped, per-space permissions. Ahead on Agent ergonomics, 78 against 71; Payments & pricing, 35 against 20; Transparency & trust, 80 against 75.

| Category | Kontent.ai | Storyblok |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 82 | 79 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 74 | 68 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 71 | 78 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 81 | 73 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 20 | 35 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 83 | 80 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 75 | 80 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Kontent.ai | Storyblok |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Kontent CZ s.r.o. | Storyblok GmbH |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://manage.kontent.ai/v2` | `https://mapi.storyblok.com/v1` |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Licence | Proprietary service under the Kontent.ai Terms of Service. The management SDKs for JavaScript and .NET and the MCP server on GitHub are MIT | Proprietary service under Storyblok's terms. The SDKs, API clients and CLI in storyblok/monoblok are MIT |
| Tools exposed | 54 | 7 |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| MCP registry | `io.github.kontent-ai/mcp-server` | not listed |
| Terms last updated | 2026-09-11 | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-06-02 | 2025-10-06 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | 8.4k npm/wk | 68 stars, 433k npm/wk |