# KoboldCpp vs MLX LM > KoboldCpp scores 60.5 (C) on agent readiness against MLX LM's 52.2 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. MLX LM leads on transparency & trust. Both do local inference. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/koboldcpp-vs-mlx-lm - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/koboldcpp-vs-mlx-lm.md (~2,450 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/koboldcpp-vs-mlx-lm.min.md (~530 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/koboldcpp-vs-mlx-lm.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-09 KoboldCpp scores 60.5 (C) on agent readiness against MLX LM's 52.2 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. MLX LM leads on transparency & trust. Both do local inference. - KoboldCpp: grade C, 60.5/100, rank #462 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/koboldcpp.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/koboldcpp.json - MLX LM: grade D, 52.2/100, rank #657 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mlx-lm.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/mlx-lm.json ## Which one, for what ### KoboldCpp (C) Good for: An owner who wants text, image, speech and music models behind one executable with a writing and roleplay interface, and clients that speak the KoboldAI, OpenAI, Ollama or Anthropic formats. Ahead on: - Schema & documentation, 68 against 37 - Agent ergonomics, 63 against 54 - Security & auth, 38 against 32 - Maintenance & community, 82 against 61 Watch for: With no `--host` the server accepts connections on all routable interfaces, and no password is set by default ### MLX LM (D) Good for: An owner with an Apple silicon Mac who wants MLX-format models, local fine-tuning and quantisation from Python or the command line, with a simple local chat completions server. Ahead on: - Transparency & trust, 66 against 49 Watch for: `mlx_lm.server` has no API key or other credential option, and `--allowed-origins` defaults to `*` ## Score by category | Category | Weight | KoboldCpp | MLX LM | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 68 | 66 | KoboldCpp +2 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 68 | 37 | KoboldCpp +31 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 63 | 54 | KoboldCpp +9 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 38 | 32 | KoboldCpp +6 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 60 | 60 | even | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 82 | 61 | KoboldCpp +21 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 49 | 66 | MLX LM +17 | | Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **60.5 · C** | **52.2 · D** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | KoboldCpp | MLX LM | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | LostRuins (Concedo) | Apple Inc. | | Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) | | Transports | HTTP | HTTP | | Auth | None | None | | Pricing | Free | Free | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | AGPL-3.0 for KoboldCpp and KoboldAI Lite. The bundled GGML, llama.cpp and stable-diffusion.cpp code stays under MIT | MIT | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | yes | no | | Last release | 2026-09-27 | 2026-10-01 | | Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked | | Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked | | Customer content may train models | | | | Terms restrict automated access | | | | Terms restrict benchmarking | | | | Terms or service can change without notice | | | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | | | | Popularity | 12k stars | 7.3k stars, 140k PyPI/wk | ## Verdicts **KoboldCpp.** One file runs text, image, speech and music models behind a published OpenAPI 3.0.3 document, with eight releases in 90 days. The server listens on every interface with no password by default, and `--password` leaves the image routes open. **MLX LM.** MIT, with no telemetry found in the source, and the tests passed on the last eight pushes to main. `mlx_lm.server` has no API key option, answers any origin by default and loads whichever model a request names, and its own docs say it is not recommended for production. ## Before you call either ### KoboldCpp 1. Start with `--host 127.0.0.1` and `--password`. The default listens on every interface with no key 2. Send the password as `Authorization: Bearer `. It is not read from the query string 3. Treat 503 as both busy and rate limited. The server never sends 429 or `Retry-After`, and the wait in seconds is in `detail.msg` 4. Pass `max_length` or `max_tokens`. The default is 2,048 tokens unless `--defaultgenamt` changes it 5. Send a `genkey` with each generation so `/api/extra/generate/check` and `/api/extra/abort` act on your request and not another caller's ### MLX LM 1. Keep `mlx_lm.server` on 127.0.0.1 and pass `--allowed-origins` with the origins you trust. There is no API key, and the default answers every origin 2. Treat any caller as able to load any model. The `model` and `adapters` request fields accept any Hugging Face repository or local path 3. Send `max_tokens` or `max_completion_tokens` when you need more than 512 tokens, the server default 4. Read errors as `{"error": ""}` with 400 for a bad field and 404 for a model that failed to load. They are not OpenAI error objects 5. Poll `GET /health` before the first request. It answers 503 with `unavailable` when the generation thread has stopped ## Questions ### Which is better for AI agents, KoboldCpp or MLX LM? KoboldCpp scores 60.5 (C) on agent readiness against MLX LM's 52.2 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. MLX LM leads on transparency & trust. ### Do KoboldCpp and MLX LM need an API key? Neither needs a key. ### Can an agent call KoboldCpp and MLX LM without installing anything? No hosted endpoint is listed for KoboldCpp. No hosted endpoint is listed for MLX LM. ### Are KoboldCpp and MLX LM open source? Yes. KoboldCpp is open source (AGPL-3.0 for KoboldCpp and KoboldAI Lite. The bundled GGML, llama.cpp and stable-diffusion.cpp code stays under MIT). MLX LM is open source (MIT). ## For agents - This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/koboldcpp-vs-mlx-lm.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/koboldcpp-vs-mlx-lm.min.md - Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "koboldcpp", "b": "mlx-lm"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare koboldcpp mlx-lm` - Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/koboldcpp.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/mlx-lm.json ## Other comparisons with KoboldCpp or MLX LM - [AnythingLLM vs KoboldCpp](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anythingllm-vs-koboldcpp.md) - [AnythingLLM vs MLX LM](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anythingllm-vs-mlx-lm.md) - [Docker Model Runner vs KoboldCpp](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/docker-model-runner-vs-koboldcpp.md) - [Docker Model Runner vs MLX LM](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/docker-model-runner-vs-mlx-lm.md) - [Foundry Local vs KoboldCpp](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/foundry-local-vs-koboldcpp.md) - [Foundry Local vs MLX LM](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/foundry-local-vs-mlx-lm.md) - [Core vs KoboldCpp](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ghost-core-vs-koboldcpp.md) - [Core vs MLX LM](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ghost-core-vs-mlx-lm.md) - [GPT4All vs KoboldCpp](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gpt4all-vs-koboldcpp.md) - [GPT4All vs MLX LM](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gpt4all-vs-mlx-lm.md) - [Jan vs KoboldCpp](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jan-vs-koboldcpp.md) - [Jan vs MLX LM](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jan-vs-mlx-lm.md) - [Khoj vs KoboldCpp](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/khoj-vs-koboldcpp.md) - [Khoj vs MLX LM](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/khoj-vs-mlx-lm.md) - [KoboldCpp vs Lemonade](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/koboldcpp-vs-lemonade.md) - [KoboldCpp vs llama.cpp](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/koboldcpp-vs-llama-cpp.md) - [KoboldCpp vs LM Studio](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/koboldcpp-vs-lm-studio.md) - [KoboldCpp vs LocalAI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/koboldcpp-vs-localai.md) - [KoboldCpp vs Ollama](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/koboldcpp-vs-ollama.md) - [KoboldCpp vs Open WebUI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/koboldcpp-vs-open-webui.md) - [KoboldCpp vs screenpipe](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/koboldcpp-vs-screenpipe.md) - [KoboldCpp vs TextGen](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/koboldcpp-vs-text-generation-webui.md) - [Lemonade vs MLX LM](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lemonade-vs-mlx-lm.md) - [llama.cpp vs MLX LM](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/llama-cpp-vs-mlx-lm.md) - [LM Studio vs MLX LM](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lm-studio-vs-mlx-lm.md) - [LocalAI vs MLX LM](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/localai-vs-mlx-lm.md) - [MLX LM vs Ollama](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mlx-lm-vs-ollama.md) - [MLX LM vs Open WebUI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mlx-lm-vs-open-webui.md) - [MLX LM vs screenpipe](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mlx-lm-vs-screenpipe.md) - [MLX LM vs TextGen](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mlx-lm-vs-text-generation-webui.md) - [KoboldCpp vs Underdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/koboldcpp-vs-underdog.md) - [MLX LM vs Underdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mlx-lm-vs-underdog.md)