# Kimi K3.1 Pro vs occamy-1.0 (slim)

> occamy-1.0 scores 61 (C) to Kimi K3.1 Pro's 48.6 (D) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro-vs-occamy-1-0.md (~8,750 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro-vs-occamy-1-0.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro-vs-occamy-1-0
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

occamy-1.0 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Kimi K3.1 Pro's 48.6 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Kimi K3.1 Pro: D 48.6, rank #151 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/kimi-k3-1-pro.min.md
- occamy-1.0: C 61, rank #59 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/occamy-1-0.min.md
- Kimi K3.1 Pro, good for Operators with a multi-accelerator node who want Moonshot's newest open-weight model for coding and long agent sessions, and everyone else through an API
- occamy-1.0, good for Agents that want an Apache 2.0 mixture-of-experts model tuned for long tool-using tasks on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac. Ahead on Reach, 90 against 40; Risk, 55 against 50; Agent interface, 70 against 65; Documentation and upkeep, 74 against 51.

| Category | Kimi K3.1 Pro | occamy-1.0 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 40 | 90 |
| Risk (20%) | 50 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 65 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 51 | 74 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Kimi K3.1 Pro | occamy-1.0 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Moonshot AI | Accio (Accio-Lab) |
| Licence | Kimi K3.1 Pro License (modified MIT) | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-11-05 | 2026-10-02 |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (4) |

Why the edge:
- Reach, occamy-1.0 +50: Kimi K3.1 Pro 40 (Memory 0, the only build is Moonshot's 1,561 GB MXFP4 release, far above 256 GB.); occamy-1.0 90 (Memory 25 of 30, Accio's MLX mxfp4 build is 18.4 GB, 22.1 GB with a fifth added, and its IQ4_XS GGUF needs 22.5 GB, both within 24 GB.)
- Documentation and upkeep, occamy-1.0 +23: Kimi K3.1 Pro 51 (Model card 11, no limitations, languages or cut-off.); occamy-1.0 74 (Model card 14 of 20, languages and a knowledge cut-off are missing.)
- Risk, occamy-1.0 +5: Kimi K3.1 Pro 50 (File safety 15, safetensors only, less 10 for remote code and prompts built by the repository's script.); occamy-1.0 55 (File safety 25, safetensors only and nothing from the repository runs to load it or build prompts.)
- Agent interface, occamy-1.0 +5: Kimi K3.1 Pro 65 (Chat template 10, the format is only code to run.); occamy-1.0 70 (Chat template 20, the base's Jinja template in the repository.)