# Khoj vs screenpipe (slim)

> screenpipe has a score of 61.1 (C) against Khoj's 38.8 (E). Both do memory search. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 63 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/khoj-vs-screenpipe.md (~1,950 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/khoj-vs-screenpipe.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/khoj-vs-screenpipe
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

screenpipe has a score of 61.1 (C) against Khoj's 38.8 (E). Both do memory search. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 63 points.

- Khoj: E 38.8, rank #426 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/khoj.min.md
- screenpipe: C 61.1, rank #233 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/screenpipe.min.md
- Pick Khoj for payments & pricing (+30). Pick screenpipe for schema & documentation (+47), agent ergonomics (+29), security & auth (+19), maintenance & community (+63), transparency & trust (+9).

| Category | Khoj | screenpipe |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 65 | 65 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 34 | 81 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 46 | 75 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 29 | 48 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 19 | 82 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 64 | 73 |