# Keycard vs WorkOS Pipes and Agents (slim)

> WorkOS Pipes and Agents has a score of 60 (C) against Keycard's 56.3 (C). Both do auth oauth. The largest gap is reliability, 35 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/keycard-vs-workos-pipes.md (~1,550 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/keycard-vs-workos-pipes.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/keycard-vs-workos-pipes
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

WorkOS Pipes and Agents has a score of 60 (C) against Keycard's 56.3 (C). Both do auth oauth. The largest gap is reliability, 35 points.

- Keycard: C 56.3, rank #303 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/keycard.min.md
- WorkOS Pipes and Agents: C 60, rank #256 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/workos-pipes.min.md
- Pick Keycard for schema & documentation (+8), security & auth (+17), payments & pricing (+20). Pick WorkOS Pipes and Agents for reliability (+35), agent ergonomics (+9), transparency & trust (+19).

| Category | Keycard | WorkOS Pipes and Agents |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 35 | 70 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 61 | 53 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 60 | 69 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 86 | 69 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 10 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 79 | 83 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 45 | 64 |