# Kestra vs Make API + MCP

> Kestra scores 63.6 (B) on agent readiness against Make API + MCP's 58.7 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Make API + MCP leads on security & auth. Both do automation workflows. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kestra-vs-make
- Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kestra-vs-make.md (~2,200 tokens)
- Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kestra-vs-make.min.md (~730 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts)
- JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kestra-vs-make.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json)
- Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt)
- API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json
- Updated: 2026-10-09

Kestra scores 63.6 (B) on agent readiness against Make API + MCP's 58.7 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Make API + MCP leads on security & auth. Both do automation workflows.

- Kestra: grade B, 63.6/100, rank #351 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/kestra.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/kestra.json
- Make API + MCP: grade C, 58.7/100, rank #516 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/make.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/make.json

## Which one, for what

### Kestra (B)

Good for: Engineering and data teams that want declarative YAML flows with scripts in any language, run on their own infrastructure.

Ahead on:
- Reliability, 89 against 63
- Schema & documentation, 82 against 66
- Agent ergonomics, 73 against 63
- Payments & pricing, 50 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 93 against 36

Also in its favour:
- Open source

Watch for: The open-source edition has one basic-auth username and password. API tokens, service accounts, RBAC and audit logs need Enterprise or Cloud

### Make API + MCP (C)

Good for: Teams who build in a visual editor and want an agent to run those scenarios as tools, cloud only.

Ahead on:
- Security & auth, 68 against 41

Also in its favour:
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Free to start without a card
- No incidents deducted, where Kestra loses 7 points for them

Watch for: No published OpenAPI file and no official SDK


## Score by category

| Category | Weight | Kestra | Make API + MCP | Edge |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 89 | 63 | Kestra +26 |
| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 82 | 66 | Kestra +16 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 73 | 63 | Kestra +10 |
| Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 41 | 68 | Make API + MCP +27 |
| Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 50 | 30 | Kestra +20 |
| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 93 | 36 | Kestra +57 |
| Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 69 | 72 | Make API + MCP +3 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -7 | 0 | |
| **Total** | | **63.6 · B** | **58.7 · C** | |

## Facts side by side

| Fact | Kestra | Make API + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Kestra Technologies | Make (Celonis) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://eu1.make.com/api/v2` |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (open-source server and SDK repository). Enterprise Edition and Kestra Cloud are commercial | proprietary |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | `com.make/mcp-server` |
| Last release | 2026-10-05 | none |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | couldn't be read |
| Customer content may train models |  | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access |  | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking |  | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice |  | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |  | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | 29k stars, 244 npm/wk, 170 PyPI/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (2) |

## Verdicts

**Kestra.** Kestra's open-source edition has a 216-operation OpenAPI spec, Markdown docs for agents and weekly patch releases on two long-term support lines. Its only credential is one basic-auth username and password with full access, and five critical advisories were published between March and September 2026, all fixed.

**Make API + MCP.** Hosted MCP server with OAuth, and scenario run tools on the free plan. No published OpenAPI file and no official SDK.

## Before you call either

### Kestra

1. Run 2.0.5 or 1.3.42 or later. Earlier builds carry unauthenticated remote code execution advisories fixed in 1.3.38 and 2.0.3
2. Set `kestra.server.basic-auth` in the config file before first start. Without it the setup page is open to anyone who reaches the port
3. Put the tenant in the path. Open-source instances use `main`, as in `/api/v1/main/executions/{namespace}/{id}`
4. Send flow inputs as multipart form fields, and add `wait=true` to get the finished execution in the same call
5. Keep port 8081 off any shared network. The management endpoints there skip the API's basic auth

### Make API + MCP

1. Find the organisation's zone first. It may be on make.com or make.celonis.com
2. Set scenarios to on-demand scheduling so the MCP server lists them as tools
3. Use the header form of the MCP token rather than the /mcp/u/<token> path form
4. On a 429, wait a full minute. The limit resets per minute and no Retry-After is sent
5. Check the `code` field on errors. IM002 means the token lacks rights, not that the resource is missing

## Questions

### Which is better for AI agents, Kestra or Make API + MCP?

Kestra scores 63.6 (B) on agent readiness against Make API + MCP's 58.7 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Make API + MCP leads on security & auth.

### Do Kestra and Make API + MCP need an API key?

Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.

### Can an agent call Kestra and Make API + MCP without installing anything?

No hosted endpoint is listed for Kestra. Make API + MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://eu1.make.com/api/v2.

### Are Kestra and Make API + MCP open source?

Kestra is open source (Apache-2.0 (open-source server and SDK repository). Enterprise Edition and Kestra Cloud are commercial). No open-source release is listed for Make API + MCP.


## For agents

- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kestra-vs-make.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kestra-vs-make.min.md
- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "kestra", "b": "make"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare kestra make`
- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/kestra.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/make.json

## Other comparisons with Kestra or Make API + MCP

- [Activepieces API + MCP vs Kestra](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-kestra.md)
- [Activepieces API + MCP vs Make API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-make.md)
- [Gumloop vs Kestra](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gumloop-vs-kestra.md)
- [Gumloop vs Make API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gumloop-vs-make.md)
- [Kestra vs n8n API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kestra-vs-n8n.md)
- [Kestra vs Paragon ActionKit + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kestra-vs-paragon.md)
- [Kestra vs Pipedream API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kestra-vs-pipedream.md)
- [Kestra vs Microsoft Power Automate](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kestra-vs-power-automate.md)
- [Kestra vs Tray.ai API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kestra-vs-tray.md)
- [Kestra vs Windmill API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kestra-vs-windmill.md)
- [Kestra vs Workato API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kestra-vs-workato.md)
- [Make API + MCP vs n8n API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-n8n.md)
- [Make API + MCP vs Paragon ActionKit + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-paragon.md)
- [Make API + MCP vs Pipedream API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-pipedream.md)
- [Make API + MCP vs Microsoft Power Automate](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-power-automate.md)
- [Make API + MCP vs Tray.ai API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-tray.md)
- [Make API + MCP vs Windmill API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-windmill.md)
- [Make API + MCP vs Workato API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-workato.md)