{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "keeper-secrets-manager", "name": "Keeper Secrets Manager", "vendor": "Keeper Security, Inc.", "vendorUrl": "https://www.keepersecurity.com/secrets-manager.html", "kind": "http-api", "category": "secrets", "summary": "Keeper Secrets Manager is a cloud vault for infrastructure secrets, sold as an add-on to Keeper Security's business password manager. Applications read secrets through SDKs in seven languages, the `ksm` CLI or a local MCP server, decrypting on the client.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/keeper-secrets-manager", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/keeper-secrets-manager.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/keeper-secrets-manager.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/keeper-secrets-manager.json", "repo": "https://github.com/Keeper-Security/secrets-manager", "license": "Proprietary service under Keeper's SaaS Terms of Use. The SDKs, CLI, MCP server and agent kit on GitHub are MIT", "transports": [ "http", "stdio" ], "packages": [ { "registry": "pypi", "name": "keeper-secrets-manager-core" }, { "registry": "pypi", "name": "keeper-secrets-manager-cli" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@keeper-security/secrets-manager-core" } ], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "Access is granted by a person. A vault user whose role allows it creates a Secrets Manager application, shares folders or records with it, and adds a client device, which yields a one-time access token or a Base64 configuration. The client redeems the token once, registers its own ECC public key and signs every later request with the private key, so no bearer secret is reused. Devices are IP-locked by default, can be given an access expiry and are revoked individually.", "pricing": "paid", "pricingNotes": "Secrets Manager is an add-on to Keeper's business password manager plans, licensed per user per year, and included with KeeperPAM. The add-ons page shows Custom Pricing and Request a Quote for it, so there is no public figure. A 14-day business trial needs no credit card and can enable Secrets Manager, so an agent's owner can start without a contract. Base plan prices are drawn by script and were blank to our reader (https://www.keepersecurity.com/pricing/business-add-ons/, https://www.keepersecurity.com/trial/keeper-free-trial/, checked 2026-10-08).", "priceSummary": "Paid", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the Secrets Manager docs, the SDK repository or the pricing pages (checked 2026-10-08).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 19, "popularity": { "githubStars": 117, "npmWeekly": 52332, "pypiWeekly": 45154, "asOf": "2026-10-08" }, "docsUrl": "https://docs.keeper.io/en/keeperpam/secrets-manager/overview", "llmsTxt": "https://docs.keeper.io/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "secrets.store", "secrets.machine-identity", "secrets.audit", "secrets.rotate" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "enterprise", "zero-knowledge", "mcp", "cli", "python", "javascript", "java", "go", "dotnet", "ruby", "rust", "llms-txt", "sales-led", "status-page", "bug-bounty", "soc2", "fedramp" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-06", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 69.4, "grade": "B", "agentReady": false, "rank": 159, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 722, "categoryRank": 9, "methodology": "0.4", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 63, "maintenance": 92, "payments": 20, "reliability": 76, "schema": 71, "security": 86, "transparency": 78 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-10-08" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Each client device signs requests with its own key, is locked to an IP address by default and can be revoked alone, and secrets decrypt only on the client. The add-on has no public price, no request limits were found in the reviewed documentation, and a person must create the application and device in the vault.", "bestFor": "Companies already on Keeper's business vault that want per-device machine identities with client-side decryption and an official MCP server.", "strengths": [ "Each device registers its own ECC key from a one-time token, is IP-locked by default and can be revoked alone", "Secrets decrypt on the client. Keeper's cloud stores and sends ciphertext only, per the encryption model page", "An application sees only the shared folders and records assigned to it, read-only unless shared as editable", "Official MIT MCP server with 19 typed tools, masked values by default and confirmation for writes, deletes and unmasking", "SDKs for Python, Java, JavaScript, .NET, Go, Ruby and Rust in one MIT repository, with 5 tagged releases since 15 September 2026" ], "weaknesses": [ "Secrets Manager is priced by quote. The add-ons page shows Custom Pricing and Request a Quote", "No request limits were found in the reviewed documentation. Throttling arrives as HTTP 403 with `{\"error\":\"throttled\"}`", "No OpenAPI or documented raw HTTP use for `/api/rest/sm/v1`. The SDKs are the only supported route", "The Node MCP guide links a GitHub repository that returned 404 on 8 October 2026", "Rotation needs a KeeperPAM licence and a Keeper Gateway, and access events are read in the separately sold reporting module" ], "agentNotes": [ "Ask the vault owner for a new device on an application that holds only the folders the task needs. Use the Base64 configuration, not the first one-time token", "Run commands under `ksm exec` so secrets arrive as environment variables and stay out of the model's context", "Expect HTTP 403 with `{\"error\":\"throttled\"}` under load. The Python SDK retries five times from 11 seconds, so allow for long waits", "A device is locked to the IP address it first connects from unless it was created with `--unlock-ip`. Check this before running from a dynamic address", "Leave `--auto-approve` off on the MCP server. It removes confirmation for deletes and for unmasking values" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "B", "methodology": "0.4", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 69.4 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 63, "maintenance": 92, "payments": 20, "reliability": 76, "schema": 71, "security": 86, "transparency": 58 }, "provenanceScore": 98 }, "connect": { "install": "pip3 install keeper-secrets-manager-cli # or: pip3 install keeper-secrets-manager-core, npm install @keeper-security/secrets-manager-core", "http": "ksm profile init XX:XXXX # one-time access token from the vault\nksm secret list # values decrypt on the client, so plain curl can't read them", "claudeCode": "/plugin marketplace add Keeper-Security/keeper-agent-kit\n/plugin install keeper-secrets@keeper-security", "config": { "mcpServers": { "ksm": { "args": [ "run", "-i", "--rm", "-e", "KSM_CONFIG_BASE64=YOUR_BASE64_CONFIG_STRING_HERE", "keeper/keeper-mcp-server:latest" ], "command": "docker" } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/secrets.store", "tool": "https://letme.dev/keeper-secrets-manager" }, "area": "agent-runtime", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Keeper Security, Inc.", "domain": "keepersecurity.com", "domainRegistered": "2007-04-12", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.keepersecurity.com/legal/terms-of-use/#saas-terms", "privacy": "https://www.keepersecurity.com/legal/terms-of-use/?s=privacy", "statusPage": "https://statuspage.keeper.io", "changelog": "https://docs.keeper.io/release-notes/enterprise/keeper-secrets-manager/2026", "securityTxt": "valid", "checked": "2026-10-08", "notes": [ "Keeper publishes its website terms, SaaS Terms of Use, partner terms, privacy policy and Service Level Objectives as sections of one page at www.keepersecurity.com/legal/terms-of-use/. The SaaS section governs the service and the `?s=privacy` view is the privacy policy. The old `/termsofuse.html` and `/privacypolicy.html` addresses redirect there.", "The SaaS terms name Keeper Security, Inc., 311 W. Monroe Street, Suite 406, Chicago, IL 60606, with Keeper Security EMEA Limited and Keeper Security APAC KK for other regions. The page links legacy terms for the period before 9 March 2026.", "The SaaS terms forbid a customer to perform penetration or load testing on the services, and the website terms prohibit scraping or automated data collection on the website.", "www.keepersecurity.com/.well-known/security.txt answers with a Bugcrowd contact and Expires 2026-12-31T23:59:59Z.", "The SDKs call https://\u003cregion host\u003e/api/rest/sm/v1, where the host is keepersecurity.com, keepersecurity.eu, keepersecurity.com.au, keepersecurity.ca, keepersecurity.jp or govcloud.keepersecurity.us.", "The status page and the docs sit on keeper.io. statuspage.keeper.io is Atlassian Statuspage with a Keeper Secrets Manager component.", "RDAP for keepersecurity.com gives a registration date of 2007-04-12." ], "score": 98 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/keeper-secrets-manager.json", "live": { "slug": "keeper-secrets-manager", "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://statuspage.keeper.io", "indicator": "none", "summary": "All Systems Operational", "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T21:58:00.288548858Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-10-08T21:58:00.288548858Z" } }, "answer": "Pulumi ESC scores 71.1 (BB) on agent readiness against Keeper Secrets Manager's 69.4 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Keeper Secrets Manager leads on reliability, security \u0026 auth, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust.", "b": { "slug": "pulumi-esc", "name": "Pulumi ESC", "vendor": "Pulumi Corporation", "vendorUrl": "https://www.pulumi.com", "kind": "http-api", "category": "secrets", "summary": "Pulumi ESC is the secrets and configuration service in Pulumi Cloud. Environments hold static secrets, pull from other vaults and issue short-lived cloud credentials over OIDC, read through the Pulumi CLI, a REST API and four SDKs.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/pulumi-esc", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/pulumi-esc.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/pulumi-esc.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/pulumi-esc.json", "repo": "https://github.com/pulumi/esc-sdk", "license": "Proprietary service under Pulumi's Terms \u0026 Conditions. The Pulumi CLI, the ESC evaluator and the ESC SDKs are Apache-2.0", "transports": [ "http" ], "remoteUrl": "https://api.pulumi.com", "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@pulumi/esc-sdk" }, { "registry": "pypi", "name": "pulumi-esc-sdk" }, { "registry": "go", "name": "github.com/pulumi/esc-sdk/sdk" } ], "auth": "mixed", "authNotes": "Self-serve. Every request sends `Authorization: token \u003ctoken\u003e` to https://api.pulumi.com. A personal token comes from the console and carries all of the user's permissions. Organisation tokens (Essentials and above) and team tokens (Pro and above) are machine tokens that take a role, and custom roles with environment scopes need Pro. A workload on a registered OIDC issuer (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, EKS, GKE and others) exchanges its ID token for a short-lived Pulumi token with `pulumi login --oidc-token` or POST /api/oauth/token. Under an agent with no credentials the CLI creates an ephemeral account by itself.", "pricing": "freemium", "pricingNotes": "Free edition with 25 secrets and 10,000 API calls a month for one user, no card. Essentials is $40 a month, Pro $400 and Enterprise $2,000, each including that many credits, with a managed secret at $0.50, $0.75 or $1.00 a month and API calls at $0.10 per 10,000. An agent can start with no contract through the free edition or an agent account (https://www.pulumi.com/pricing/, checked 2026-10-08).", "priceSummary": "$0.01 / 1k req", "where": "hosted", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the ESC docs, the OpenAPI document or the pricing page (checked 2026-10-08).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": 20661, "pypiWeekly": 53903, "asOf": "2026-10-08" }, "docsUrl": "https://www.pulumi.com/docs/esc/", "llmsTxt": "https://www.pulumi.com/llms.txt", "openapi": "https://api.pulumi.com/api/openapi/pulumi-spec.json", "capabilities": [ "secrets.store", "secrets.rotate", "secrets.machine-identity", "secrets.audit" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "closed-source", "freemium", "free-tier", "no-card", "openapi", "llms-txt", "oidc", "cli", "typescript", "python", "go", "dotnet", "status-page", "soc2", "enterprise" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-07", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 71.1, "grade": "BB", "agentReady": true, "rank": 120, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 722, "categoryRank": 7, "methodology": "0.4", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 75, "maintenance": 82, "payments": 55, "reliability": 60, "schema": 82, "security": 79, "transparency": 65 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-10-08" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "An agent can start without a signup, because the Pulumi CLI creates a free ephemeral account that includes ESC, and the REST API has a public OpenAPI document. Audit logs, custom roles and approvals need the Pro edition at $400 a month, and no API rate limit was found in the reviewed documentation.", "bestFor": "Teams already on Pulumi, or anyone who wants one place that composes static secrets, other vaults and short-lived cloud credentials, and agents that need to start with no signup.", "strengths": [ "The Pulumi CLI creates a free ephemeral account for an agent with no signup, with write access for 72 hours and 30 days to claim it", "Public OpenAPI 3.0.3 document with 127 ESC operations, an llms.txt and a Markdown copy of every docs page", "OIDC issuers exchange a workload's ID token for a short-lived Pulumi token, 25 hours at most by default", "Separate read, open and write scopes per environment, with open approvals and update approvals on Pro and Enterprise", "Prices published per unit, $0.50 a secret a month on Essentials and $0.10 per 10,000 API calls, with a free edition and no card" ], "weaknesses": [ "Audit logs, custom roles, team tokens, approvals and customer-managed keys need Pro ($400 a month) or Enterprise", "No API rate limit with numbers was found in the reviewed documentation", "No public data processing addendum or subprocessor list was found, and the terms and privacy statement carry no date", "The official Pulumi MCP server lists no ESC tools, and the standalone esc CLI was retired at v0.26.0 on 9 July 2026", "A 42-minute major incident on 6 October 2026 affected inbound OIDC on the API and ESC, with no detail published", "The free edition has personal tokens only, which carry all of the user's permissions" ], "agentNotes": [ "Use `pulumi env`, not `esc`. The standalone CLI stopped at v0.26.0 and gets no security fixes", "Read one value with `pulumi env open \u003corg\u003e/\u003cproject\u003e/\u003cenv\u003e \u003cproperty path\u003e` so the whole environment doesn't enter context", "Run tools with `pulumi env run \u003cenv\u003e -- \u003ccmd\u003e`, which filters secret values from the command's output unless -i is set", "Set PULUMI_ACCESS_TOKEN for the SDKs. From 0.14.0 they no longer read the CLI login on disk", "Send `Authorization: token \u003ctoken\u003e` and `Accept: application/vnd.pulumi+8` on REST calls, and expect 409 when an environment changed since it was read", "Relay the claim link an agent account prints. The account goes read-only after 72 hours and locks after 30 days unclaimed" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "BB", "methodology": "0.4", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 71.1 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 75, "maintenance": 82, "payments": 55, "reliability": 60, "schema": 82, "security": 79, "transparency": 48 }, "provenanceScore": 82 }, "connect": { "install": "curl -fsSL https://get.pulumi.com | sh", "http": "curl -H \"Authorization: token $PULUMI_ACCESS_TOKEN\" \\\n -H \"Accept: application/vnd.pulumi+8\" \\\n https://api.pulumi.com/api/user" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/secrets.store", "tool": "https://letme.dev/pulumi-esc" }, "area": "agent-runtime", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "ESC API calls", "unit": "1k-requests", "usd": 0.01, "note": "$0.10 per 10,000. First 10,000 a month free on the free edition" }, { "item": "Essentials edition", "unit": "month", "usd": 40, "note": "Includes 40 credits. A managed secret is $0.50 a month" }, { "item": "Pro edition", "unit": "month", "usd": 400, "note": "Includes 400 credits. A managed secret is $0.75 a month" }, { "item": "Enterprise edition", "unit": "month", "usd": 2000, "note": "Includes 2,000 credits. A managed secret is $1.00 a month" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Pulumi Corporation", "domain": "pulumi.com", "domainRegistered": "2017-02-13", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.pulumi.com/terms-and-conditions/", "privacy": "https://www.pulumi.com/privacy/", "statusPage": "https://status.pulumi.com", "changelog": "https://www.pulumi.com/releases/changelog/", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-10-08", "notes": [ "The Terms \u0026 Conditions govern use of the Pulumi Services and name Pulumi Corporation, 601 Union St., Suite 1415, Seattle, WA 98101, with Washington law and King County courts. We found no date on the page.", "The privacy statement covers customers who register to use the services and gives privacy@pulumi.com as contact. We found no date on the page.", "www.pulumi.com/.well-known/security.txt and www.pulumi.com/security.txt both return 404. The security page gives security@pulumi.com and a PGP key.", "status.pulumi.com is Atlassian Statuspage with an ESC component. Its incident feed goes back to October 2023.", "No data processing addendum or subprocessor list was found on www.pulumi.com. The addresses we tried returned 404 and the sitemap lists neither.", "RDAP for pulumi.com gives a registration date of 2017-02-13." ], "score": 82 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/pulumi-esc.json", "live": { "slug": "pulumi-esc", "probe": { "target": "https://api.pulumi.com", "method": "get", "lastAt": "2026-10-08T21:53:31.403596292Z", "lastOk": true, "lastStatus": 404, "lastMs": 162, "authRequired": false, "uptime24h": 100, "uptime30d": 100, "p50ms24h": 159, "p95ms24h": 247, "samples24h": 48, "samples30d": 48, "days": [ { "date": "2026-10-08", "probes": 48, "ok": 48 } ] }, "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://status.pulumi.com", "indicator": "none", "summary": "All Systems Operational", "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T21:58:11.543622052Z" }, "pages": [ { "url": "https://www.pulumi.com/releases/changelog/", "kind": "changelog", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T18:29:52.955269848Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "ddd6467eba9b" }, { "url": "https://www.pulumi.com/pricing/", "kind": "pricing", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T18:29:48.804855492Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "ba84dc7bc768" }, { "url": "https://www.pulumi.com/privacy/", "kind": "privacy", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T18:29:51.056197289Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "96eac852b529" }, { "url": "https://www.pulumi.com/terms-and-conditions/", "kind": "terms", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T18:29:55.102680068Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "660bfdce2184" } ], "updatedAt": "2026-10-08T21:58:11.543622052Z" } }, "facts": [ { "a": "HTTP API", "b": "HTTP API", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "Keeper Security, Inc.", "b": "Pulumi Corporation", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "no (local only)", "b": "https://api.pulumi.com", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "HTTP, stdio", "b": "HTTP", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "API key", "b": "OAuth or key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Paid", "b": "Freemium", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "Proprietary service under Keeper's SaaS Terms of Use. The SDKs, CLI, MCP server and agent kit on GitHub are MIT", "b": "Proprietary service under Pulumi's Terms \u0026 Conditions. The Pulumi CLI, the ESC evaluator and the ESC SDKs are Apache-2.0", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "19", "b": "none", "name": "Tools exposed" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "yes", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "yes", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "2026-10-06", "b": "2026-10-07", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "no date given", "b": "no date given", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "no date given", "b": "no date given", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "yes", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "117 stars, 52k npm/wk, 45k PyPI/wk", "b": "21k npm/wk, 54k PyPI/wk", "name": "Popularity" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "Pulumi ESC scores 71.1 (BB) on agent readiness against Keeper Secrets Manager's 69.4 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Keeper Secrets Manager leads on reliability, security \u0026 auth, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, Keeper Secrets Manager or Pulumi ESC?" }, { "answer": "Keeper Secrets Manager needs an API key. Pulumi ESC takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.", "question": "Do Keeper Secrets Manager and Pulumi ESC need an API key?" }, { "answer": "Keeper Secrets Manager runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. Pulumi ESC has a hosted endpoint at https://api.pulumi.com.", "question": "Can an agent call Keeper Secrets Manager and Pulumi ESC without installing anything?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Reliability, 76 against 60", "Security \u0026 auth, 86 against 79", "Maintenance \u0026 community, 92 against 82", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 78 against 65" ], "also": [ "Runs on your own machine" ], "goodFor": "Companies already on Keeper's business vault that want per-device machine identities with client-side decryption and an official MCP server.", "slug": "keeper-secrets-manager", "watchFor": "Secrets Manager is priced by quote. The add-ons page shows Custom Pricing and Request a Quote" }, { "aheadOn": [ "Schema \u0026 documentation, 82 against 71", "Agent ergonomics, 75 against 63", "Payments \u0026 pricing, 55 against 20" ], "also": [ "Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better", "A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install", "Free to start without a card" ], "goodFor": "Teams already on Pulumi, or anyone who wants one place that composes static secrets, other vaults and short-lived cloud credentials, and agents that need to start with no signup.", "slug": "pulumi-esc", "watchFor": "Audit logs, custom roles, team tokens, approvals and customer-managed keys need Pro ($400 a month) or Enterprise" } ], "job": { "capability": "secrets.store", "name": "Secrets store" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/1password-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.json", "title": "1Password service accounts, SDKs and Environments MCP vs Keeper Secrets Manager", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/1password-vs-keeper-secrets-manager" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/1password-vs-pulumi-esc.json", "title": "1Password service accounts, SDKs and Environments MCP vs Pulumi ESC", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/1password-vs-pulumi-esc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/akeyless-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.json", "title": "Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs Keeper Secrets Manager", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/akeyless-vs-keeper-secrets-manager" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/akeyless-vs-pulumi-esc.json", "title": "Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs Pulumi ESC", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/akeyless-vs-pulumi-esc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/aws-secrets-manager-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.json", "title": "AWS Secrets Manager vs Keeper Secrets Manager", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/aws-secrets-manager-vs-keeper-secrets-manager" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/aws-secrets-manager-vs-pulumi-esc.json", "title": "AWS Secrets Manager vs Pulumi ESC", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/aws-secrets-manager-vs-pulumi-esc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-key-vault-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.json", "title": "Azure Key Vault vs Keeper Secrets Manager", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-key-vault-vs-keeper-secrets-manager" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-key-vault-vs-pulumi-esc.json", "title": "Azure Key Vault vs Pulumi ESC", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-key-vault-vs-pulumi-esc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitwarden-secrets-manager-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.json", "title": "Bitwarden Secrets Manager vs Keeper Secrets Manager", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitwarden-secrets-manager-vs-keeper-secrets-manager" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitwarden-secrets-manager-vs-pulumi-esc.json", "title": "Bitwarden Secrets Manager vs Pulumi ESC", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitwarden-secrets-manager-vs-pulumi-esc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/doppler-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.json", "title": "Doppler vs Keeper Secrets Manager", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/doppler-vs-keeper-secrets-manager" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/doppler-vs-pulumi-esc.json", "title": "Doppler vs Pulumi ESC", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/doppler-vs-pulumi-esc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-secret-manager-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.json", "title": "Google Cloud Secret Manager vs Keeper Secrets Manager", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-secret-manager-vs-keeper-secrets-manager" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-secret-manager-vs-pulumi-esc.json", "title": "Google Cloud Secret Manager vs Pulumi ESC", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-secret-manager-vs-pulumi-esc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hashicorp-vault-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.json", "title": "HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server vs Keeper Secrets Manager", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hashicorp-vault-vs-keeper-secrets-manager" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hashicorp-vault-vs-pulumi-esc.json", "title": "HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server vs Pulumi ESC", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hashicorp-vault-vs-pulumi-esc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/infisical-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.json", "title": "Infisical vs Keeper Secrets Manager", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/infisical-vs-keeper-secrets-manager" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/infisical-vs-pulumi-esc.json", "title": "Infisical vs Pulumi ESC", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/infisical-vs-pulumi-esc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/keeper-secrets-manager-vs-phase.json", "title": "Keeper Secrets Manager vs Phase", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/keeper-secrets-manager-vs-phase" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/phase-vs-pulumi-esc.json", "title": "Phase vs Pulumi ESC", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/phase-vs-pulumi-esc" } ], "scores": [ { "by": 16, "edge": "keeper-secrets-manager", "keeper-secrets-manager": 76, "key": "reliability", "name": "Reliability", "pulumi-esc": 60, "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 11, "edge": "pulumi-esc", "keeper-secrets-manager": 71, "key": "schema", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "pulumi-esc": 82, "weight": 13 }, { "by": 12, "edge": "pulumi-esc", "keeper-secrets-manager": 63, "key": "ergonomics", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "pulumi-esc": 75, "weight": 13 }, { "by": 7, "edge": "keeper-secrets-manager", "keeper-secrets-manager": 86, "key": "security", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "pulumi-esc": 79, "weight": 14 }, { "by": 35, "edge": "pulumi-esc", "keeper-secrets-manager": 20, "key": "payments", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "pulumi-esc": 55, "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 10, "edge": "keeper-secrets-manager", "keeper-secrets-manager": 92, "key": "maintenance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "pulumi-esc": 82, "weight": 7 }, { "by": 13, "edge": "keeper-secrets-manager", "keeper-secrets-manager": 78, "key": "transparency", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "pulumi-esc": 65, "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "Pulumi ESC scores 71.1 (BB) on agent readiness against Keeper Secrets Manager's 69.4 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Keeper Secrets Manager leads on reliability, security \u0026 auth, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do secrets store.", "verdicts": { "keeper-secrets-manager": "Each client device signs requests with its own key, is locked to an IP address by default and can be revoked alone, and secrets decrypt only on the client. The add-on has no public price, no request limits were found in the reviewed documentation, and a person must create the application and device in the vault.", "pulumi-esc": "An agent can start without a signup, because the Pulumi CLI creates a free ephemeral account that includes ESC, and the REST API has a public OpenAPI document. Audit logs, custom roles and approvals need the Pro edition at $400 a month, and no API rate limit was found in the reviewed documentation." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/keeper-secrets-manager-vs-pulumi-esc", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/keeper-secrets-manager-vs-pulumi-esc.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/keeper-secrets-manager-vs-pulumi-esc.md", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/keeper-secrets-manager-vs-pulumi-esc.min.md" }, "markdown": "Pulumi ESC scores 71.1 (BB) on agent readiness against Keeper Secrets Manager's 69.4 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Keeper Secrets Manager leads on reliability, security \u0026 auth, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do secrets store.\n\n- Keeper Secrets Manager: grade B, 69.4/100, rank #159 of 722. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/keeper-secrets-manager.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/keeper-secrets-manager.json\n- Pulumi ESC: grade BB, 71.1/100, rank #120 of 722. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/pulumi-esc.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/pulumi-esc.json\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### Keeper Secrets Manager (B)\n\nGood for: Companies already on Keeper's business vault that want per-device machine identities with client-side decryption and an official MCP server.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 76 against 60\n- Security \u0026 auth, 86 against 79\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 92 against 82\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 78 against 65\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- Runs on your own machine\n\nWatch for: Secrets Manager is priced by quote. The add-ons page shows Custom Pricing and Request a Quote\n\n### Pulumi ESC (BB)\n\nGood for: Teams already on Pulumi, or anyone who wants one place that composes static secrets, other vaults and short-lived cloud credentials, and agents that need to start with no signup.\n\nAhead on:\n- Schema \u0026 documentation, 82 against 71\n- Agent ergonomics, 75 against 63\n- Payments \u0026 pricing, 55 against 20\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better\n- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install\n- Free to start without a card\n\nWatch for: Audit logs, custom roles, team tokens, approvals and customer-managed keys need Pro ($400 a month) or Enterprise\n\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Keeper Secrets Manager | Pulumi ESC | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 76 | 60 | Keeper Secrets Manager +16 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 71 | 82 | Pulumi ESC +11 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 63 | 75 | Pulumi ESC +12 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 86 | 79 | Keeper Secrets Manager +7 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 20 | 55 | Pulumi ESC +35 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 92 | 82 | Keeper Secrets Manager +10 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 78 | 65 | Keeper Secrets Manager +13 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **69.4 · B** | **71.1 · BB** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Keeper Secrets Manager | Pulumi ESC |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |\n| Vendor | Keeper Security, Inc. | Pulumi Corporation |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://api.pulumi.com` |\n| Transports | HTTP, stdio | HTTP |\n| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |\n| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | Proprietary service under Keeper's SaaS Terms of Use. The SDKs, CLI, MCP server and agent kit on GitHub are MIT | Proprietary service under Pulumi's Terms \u0026 Conditions. The Pulumi CLI, the ESC evaluator and the ESC SDKs are Apache-2.0 |\n| Tools exposed | 19 | none |\n| Read-only variant documented | yes | yes |\n| llms.txt | yes | yes |\n| Last release | 2026-10-06 | 2026-10-07 |\n| Terms last updated | no date given | no date given |\n| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | no date given |\n| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |\n| Popularity | 117 stars, 52k npm/wk, 45k PyPI/wk | 21k npm/wk, 54k PyPI/wk |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Keeper Secrets Manager.** Each client device signs requests with its own key, is locked to an IP address by default and can be revoked alone, and secrets decrypt only on the client. The add-on has no public price, no request limits were found in the reviewed documentation, and a person must create the application and device in the vault.\n\n**Pulumi ESC.** An agent can start without a signup, because the Pulumi CLI creates a free ephemeral account that includes ESC, and the REST API has a public OpenAPI document. Audit logs, custom roles and approvals need the Pro edition at $400 a month, and no API rate limit was found in the reviewed documentation.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Keeper Secrets Manager\n\n1. Ask the vault owner for a new device on an application that holds only the folders the task needs. Use the Base64 configuration, not the first one-time token\n2. Run commands under `ksm exec` so secrets arrive as environment variables and stay out of the model's context\n3. Expect HTTP 403 with `{\"error\":\"throttled\"}` under load. The Python SDK retries five times from 11 seconds, so allow for long waits\n4. A device is locked to the IP address it first connects from unless it was created with `--unlock-ip`. Check this before running from a dynamic address\n5. Leave `--auto-approve` off on the MCP server. It removes confirmation for deletes and for unmasking values\n\n### Pulumi ESC\n\n1. Use `pulumi env`, not `esc`. The standalone CLI stopped at v0.26.0 and gets no security fixes\n2. Read one value with `pulumi env open \u003corg\u003e/\u003cproject\u003e/\u003cenv\u003e \u003cproperty path\u003e` so the whole environment doesn't enter context\n3. Run tools with `pulumi env run \u003cenv\u003e -- \u003ccmd\u003e`, which filters secret values from the command's output unless -i is set\n4. Set PULUMI_ACCESS_TOKEN for the SDKs. From 0.14.0 they no longer read the CLI login on disk\n5. Send `Authorization: token \u003ctoken\u003e` and `Accept: application/vnd.pulumi+8` on REST calls, and expect 409 when an environment changed since it was read\n6. Relay the claim link an agent account prints. The account goes read-only after 72 hours and locks after 30 days unclaimed\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, Keeper Secrets Manager or Pulumi ESC?\n\nPulumi ESC scores 71.1 (BB) on agent readiness against Keeper Secrets Manager's 69.4 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Keeper Secrets Manager leads on reliability, security \u0026 auth, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust.\n\n### Do Keeper Secrets Manager and Pulumi ESC need an API key?\n\nKeeper Secrets Manager needs an API key. Pulumi ESC takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.\n\n### Can an agent call Keeper Secrets Manager and Pulumi ESC without installing anything?\n\nKeeper Secrets Manager runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. Pulumi ESC has a hosted endpoint at https://api.pulumi.com.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/keeper-secrets-manager-vs-pulumi-esc.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/keeper-secrets-manager-vs-pulumi-esc.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"keeper-secrets-manager\", \"b\": \"pulumi-esc\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare keeper-secrets-manager pulumi-esc`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/keeper-secrets-manager.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/pulumi-esc.json\n\n## Other comparisons with Keeper Secrets Manager or Pulumi ESC\n\n- [1Password service accounts, SDKs and Environments MCP vs Keeper Secrets Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/1password-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.md)\n- [1Password service accounts, SDKs and Environments MCP vs Pulumi ESC](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/1password-vs-pulumi-esc.md)\n- [Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs Keeper Secrets Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/akeyless-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.md)\n- [Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs Pulumi ESC](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/akeyless-vs-pulumi-esc.md)\n- [AWS Secrets Manager vs Keeper Secrets Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/aws-secrets-manager-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.md)\n- [AWS Secrets Manager vs Pulumi ESC](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/aws-secrets-manager-vs-pulumi-esc.md)\n- [Azure Key Vault vs Keeper Secrets Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-key-vault-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.md)\n- [Azure Key Vault vs Pulumi ESC](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-key-vault-vs-pulumi-esc.md)\n- [Bitwarden Secrets Manager vs Keeper Secrets Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitwarden-secrets-manager-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.md)\n- [Bitwarden Secrets Manager vs Pulumi ESC](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitwarden-secrets-manager-vs-pulumi-esc.md)\n- [Doppler vs Keeper Secrets Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/doppler-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.md)\n- [Doppler vs Pulumi ESC](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/doppler-vs-pulumi-esc.md)\n- [Google Cloud Secret Manager vs Keeper Secrets Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-secret-manager-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.md)\n- [Google Cloud Secret Manager vs Pulumi ESC](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-secret-manager-vs-pulumi-esc.md)\n- [HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server vs Keeper Secrets Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hashicorp-vault-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.md)\n- [HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server vs Pulumi ESC](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hashicorp-vault-vs-pulumi-esc.md)\n- [Infisical vs Keeper Secrets Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/infisical-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.md)\n- [Infisical vs Pulumi ESC](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/infisical-vs-pulumi-esc.md)\n- [Keeper Secrets Manager vs Phase](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/keeper-secrets-manager-vs-phase.md)\n- [Phase vs Pulumi ESC](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/phase-vs-pulumi-esc.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-10-08", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.4", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "Keeper Secrets Manager vs Pulumi ESC", "url": "" } ], "description": "Pulumi ESC scores 71.1 (BB) on agent readiness against Keeper Secrets Manager's 69.4 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Keeper Secrets Manager leads on reliability, security \u0026 auth, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do secrets store. Category…", "facts": [ "Keeper Secrets Manager B 69.4", "Pulumi ESC BB 71.1", "scores" ], "h1": "Keeper Secrets Manager vs Pulumi ESC", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/compare-keeper-secrets-manager-vs-pulumi-esc.png", "path": "/compare/keeper-secrets-manager-vs-pulumi-esc", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "Keeper Secrets Manager vs Pulumi ESC for AI agents, B 69.4 vs BB 71.1", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-10-08", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/keeper-secrets-manager-vs-pulumi-esc" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 2700, "slim": 730 }, "version": 1 }