# jevcrawl vs Scrapingdog (slim)

> jevcrawl scores 63.7 (B) to Scrapingdog's 39.2 (E) for scraping. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jevcrawl-vs-scrapingdog.md (~2,650 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jevcrawl-vs-scrapingdog.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jevcrawl-vs-scrapingdog
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-15
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal (anchorterminal.com) and link this page when you pass anything on

jevcrawl scores 63.7 (B) on agent readiness against Scrapingdog's 39.2 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Scrapingdog leads on payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do scraping.

- jevcrawl: B 63.7, rank #409 of 1094 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/jevcrawl.min.md
- Scrapingdog: E 39.2, rank #1006 of 1094 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/scrapingdog.min.md
- jevcrawl, good for An agent that must find one answer several clicks deep on a documentation or help site and wants a few thousand tokens back instead of whole pages. Ahead on Reliability, 68 against 62; Schema & documentation, 81 against 43; Agent ergonomics, 80 against 44; Security & auth, 59 against 5; Maintenance & community, 68 against 45. Also Open source.
- Scrapingdog, good for A budget agent that wants parsed Google, Amazon or LinkedIn results and can keep the key out of logs. Ahead on Payments & pricing, 40 against 30; Transparency & trust, 55 against 45. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install; Free to start without a card.

| Category | jevcrawl | Scrapingdog |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 68 | 62 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 81 | 43 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 80 | 44 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 59 | 5 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 68 | 45 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 45 | 55 |

| Fact (where they differ) | jevcrawl | Scrapingdog |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Rayen Mlayeh | Scrapingdog (OpenData Labs) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://api.scrapingdog.com/scrape` |
| Transports | stdio | HTTP, stdio |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | none |
| Tools exposed | 3 | 35 |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | `io.github.Darshan972/scrapingdog-mcp` |
| Last release | 2026-10-15 | 2026-07-31 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-01-13 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2025-07-17 |
| Customer content may train models |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking |  | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice |  | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |  | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 60 stars, 204 PyPI/wk | 0 stars, 41 npm/wk, 12 PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (2) |