{
  "data": {
    "a": {
      "slug": "invofox",
      "name": "Invofox",
      "vendor": "Invofox, Inc.",
      "vendorUrl": "https://www.invofox.com",
      "kind": "http-api",
      "category": "document-extraction",
      "summary": "Invofox is a hosted API that extracts structured, validated JSON from PDFs and images such as invoices, payslips, bank statements and custom document types, with a classifier and a splitter. Results arrive by webhook or polling.",
      "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/invofox",
      "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/invofox.md",
      "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/invofox.min.md",
      "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/invofox.json",
      "license": "Proprietary hosted service. The n8n community node on GitHub is MIT",
      "transports": [
        "http"
      ],
      "remoteUrl": "https://api.invofox.com",
      "packages": [],
      "auth": "api-key",
      "authNotes": "API key in an `x-api-key` header, created by a person under API and Webhooks in the dashboard at app.invofox.com after a self-serve sign-up. Each key is scoped to one environment, which is configured as TEST or PRODUCTION. The ingest OpenAPI file also defines an `x-access-token` header for browser sessions. No OAuth, and no scoped or read-only keys were found. Webhooks can be signed with HMAC, sent in an `x-invofox-signature` header.",
      "pricing": "freemium",
      "pricingNotes": "Free plan of 500 pages with REST API access, self-serve sign-up and no card. Starter is from $500 a month billed annually for up to 5,000 pages a month, with email support and a stated 99.9% uptime SLA. Scale and Enterprise are custom. Billing is per page, with no per-page or overage rate published. The YC launch post of 5 October 2026 mentions 1,500 free pages for new users, which the pricing page does not show (https://www.invofox.com/en/pricing.md, checked 2026-10-08).",
      "priceSummary": "$500 / mo",
      "where": "hosted",
      "x402": {
        "level": "no",
        "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the docs, the three OpenAPI files or the pricing page (checked 2026-10-08).",
        "endpoints": []
      },
      "toolCount": null,
      "popularity": {
        "githubStars": null,
        "npmWeekly": null,
        "pypiWeekly": null,
        "asOf": "2026-10-08"
      },
      "docsUrl": "https://developers.invofox.com/documentation/start-here",
      "llmsTxt": "https://developers.invofox.com/llms.txt",
      "openapi": "https://www.invofox.com/openapi.yaml",
      "capabilities": [
        "docs.extract",
        "docs.ocr",
        "docs.classify"
      ],
      "tags": [
        "hosted",
        "freemium",
        "no-card",
        "openapi",
        "llms-txt",
        "webhooks",
        "async-jobs",
        "api-key",
        "closed-source",
        "soc2"
      ],
      "lastRelease": "2026-10-05",
      "graded": true,
      "anchor": {
        "graded": true,
        "score": 46.8,
        "grade": "D",
        "agentReady": false,
        "rank": 557,
        "ranked": true,
        "rankOf": 629,
        "categoryRank": 10,
        "methodology": "0.4",
        "run": "2026-10-01",
        "scores": {
          "ergonomics": 64,
          "maintenance": 30,
          "payments": 30,
          "reliability": 30,
          "schema": 70,
          "security": 45,
          "transparency": 55
        },
        "pending": [
          "performance",
          "tasks"
        ],
        "assessment": {
          "confidence": "medium",
          "date": "2026-10-08"
        },
        "negative": 0,
        "verdict": "Three public OpenAPI 3.1 files, llms.txt and Markdown docs describe an asynchronous upload and webhook flow, and the free plan covers 500 pages without a card. No status page, rate limit numbers, changelog or official SDK were found, and documents are retained by default, with zero retention limited to Scale and Enterprise.",
        "bestFor": "Teams that process a known set of business documents (invoices, payslips, bank statements, mortgage forms) at volume and can receive webhooks.",
        "strengths": [
          "Three public OpenAPI 3.1 files (main 25 operations, ingest 7, seven webhook events), plus llms.txt and a Markdown twin of every docs page",
          "Free plan of 500 pages with REST API access and no card, by self-serve sign-up opened on 5 October 2026",
          "The document list takes `select` field projection, `filter` operators, `sort`, and `skip` and `limit` up to 500",
          "429 responses carry RateLimit-Limit, RateLimit-Remaining, RateLimit-Reset and Retry-After headers, per the main OpenAPI file",
          "security.txt valid until 1 June 2027, and the vendor states SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001:2022 certification"
        ],
        "weaknesses": [
          "No status page found. status.invofox.com does not resolve, and neither the site nor the docs link to one",
          "No rate limit numbers. The vendor's own AI briefing says rate limits and page limits per file are not publicly documented",
          "No public changelog and no official SDK. The only package is an n8n community node at 0.1.0",
          "Documents are retained by default and used to tune models. Zero retention is opt-in on Scale and Enterprise only",
          "The General Terms and Conditions that the published DPA relies on were not found on the site"
        ],
        "agentNotes": [
          "Ask the owner for an API key and the Document Type id or alias from app.invofox.com. No API endpoint lists Document Types",
          "Upload with POST /v1/ingest/uploads as multipart, with `info` as a JSON string. Send `\"useClassifier\": true` in place of `type` to have the type detected",
          "Expect 404 from GET /documents/{id} for the first seconds. Poll from 5 seconds with doubling, and stop at approved, pendingCorrection or discarded",
          "Handle the `file.rejected` webhook or check the import. A rejected file never produces a document, so polling the document waits indefinitely",
          "Do not retry an upload blindly. There is no idempotency key, so send your own id in `clientData` and look it up with `filter` first"
        ],
        "metrics": {
          "kind": "remote",
          "measured": false
        },
        "reviewCount": 0,
        "avgRating": 0,
        "history": [
          {
            "basis": "public evidence",
            "confidence": "medium",
            "grade": "D",
            "methodology": "0.4",
            "pending": [
              "performance",
              "tasks"
            ],
            "run": "2026-10-01",
            "runLabel": "October 2026 research run",
            "score": 46.8
          }
        ],
        "editorialScores": {
          "ergonomics": 64,
          "maintenance": 30,
          "payments": 30,
          "reliability": 30,
          "schema": 70,
          "security": 45,
          "transparency": 40
        },
        "provenanceScore": 69
      },
      "connect": {
        "http": "curl -s -X POST \"https://api.invofox.com/v1/ingest/uploads\" \\\n  -H \"x-api-key: $INVOFOX_API_KEY\" \\\n  -F \"files=@invoice.pdf\" \\\n  -F 'info={\"type\":\"\u003cTYPE_ID\u003e\",\"clientData\":{\"internalId\":\"inv-1234\"}}'"
      },
      "letme": {
        "capability": "https://letme.dev/docs.extract",
        "tool": "https://letme.dev/invofox"
      },
      "area": "web-data",
      "unitPrices": [
        {
          "item": "Starter plan",
          "unit": "month",
          "usd": 500,
          "note": "from $500, billed annually, up to 5,000 pages a month"
        },
        {
          "item": "Starter at its 5,000-page cap",
          "unit": "1k-pages",
          "usd": 100,
          "note": "derived from the plan price, no per-page rate is published"
        }
      ],
      "provenance": {
        "legalEntity": "Invofox, Inc. (Delaware), with a registered branch in Spain",
        "domain": "invofox.com",
        "domainRegistered": "2021-05-10",
        "endpointOnVendorDomain": true,
        "terms": "https://www.invofox.com/en/legal/#terms",
        "privacy": "https://www.invofox.com/en/legal/",
        "statusPage": "",
        "changelog": "",
        "securityTxt": "valid",
        "checked": "2026-10-08",
        "notes": [
          "The DPA names INVOFOX, Inc., registered with the Delaware Division of Corporations under number 7218056, 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington, DE 19808.",
          "The legal notice names INVOFOX INC, BRANCH IN SPAIN, C/ Aranjuez 2, 28039 Madrid, tax ID W0265699I.",
          "The terms link is a website legal notice. The General Terms and Conditions for the platform, which the DPA cites, were not found on the public site.",
          "www.invofox.com/.well-known/security.txt gives security@invofox.com and expires on 1 June 2027. The apex invofox.com returns 404 for the same path.",
          "status.invofox.com does not resolve, and no status page or changelog is linked from the site or the docs.",
          "RDAP for invofox.com gives a registration date of 2021-05-10."
        ],
        "score": 69
      },
      "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/invofox.json",
      "live": {
        "slug": "invofox",
        "probe": {
          "target": "https://api.invofox.com",
          "method": "get",
          "lastAt": "2026-10-08T17:36:37.867211279Z",
          "lastOk": true,
          "lastStatus": 200,
          "lastMs": 58,
          "authRequired": false,
          "uptime24h": 100,
          "uptime30d": 100,
          "p50ms24h": 62,
          "p95ms24h": 110,
          "samples24h": 25,
          "samples30d": 25,
          "days": [
            {
              "date": "2026-10-08",
              "probes": 25,
              "ok": 25
            }
          ]
        },
        "securityTxt": {
          "url": "https://invofox.com/.well-known/security.txt",
          "state": "none",
          "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T15:38:38.124664002Z"
        },
        "updatedAt": "2026-10-08T17:36:37.867211279Z"
      }
    },
    "answer": "Invofox scores 46.8 (D) on agent readiness against Nanonets API + MCP's 42.6 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Nanonets API + MCP leads on reliability, payments \u0026 pricing and transparency \u0026 trust.",
    "b": {
      "slug": "nanonets",
      "name": "Nanonets API + MCP",
      "vendor": "Nanonets",
      "vendorUrl": "https://nanonets.com",
      "kind": "http-api",
      "category": "document-extraction",
      "summary": "OCR and field extraction from PDFs, scans and images.",
      "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/nanonets",
      "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/nanonets.md",
      "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/nanonets.min.md",
      "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/nanonets.json",
      "repo": "https://github.com/NanoNets/docstrange",
      "license": "MIT (docstrange library)",
      "transports": [
        "http",
        "streamable-http"
      ],
      "remoteUrl": "https://extraction-api.nanonets.com/api/v2",
      "packages": [
        {
          "registry": "pypi",
          "name": "docstrange"
        }
      ],
      "auth": "mixed",
      "authNotes": "Extraction API takes a Bearer key. The older app API at app.nanonets.com/api/v2 takes the key as the HTTP Basic username with an empty password. The hosted MCP server at mcp.nanonets.com/mcp uses OAuth sign-in.",
      "pricing": "freemium",
      "pricingNotes": "Starter is free with $50 of credits and no card, then $100 a month for 100 credits. Billing is per block run, $0.02 for simple blocks, $0.10 for standard AI and $0.30 for complex AI such as data extraction, and extraction counts one run a page. Growth is quoted with up to 40% volume discount, Enterprise is custom (https://nanonets.com/pricing).",
      "priceSummary": "$100 / mo",
      "where": "hosted",
      "x402": {
        "level": "no",
        "evidence": "No x402 in docs, OpenAPI document or pricing (checked 2026-09-30).",
        "endpoints": []
      },
      "toolCount": null,
      "popularity": {
        "githubStars": 1574,
        "npmWeekly": null,
        "pypiWeekly": 47,
        "asOf": "2026-09-30"
      },
      "docsUrl": "https://docs.nanonets.com",
      "llmsTxt": "https://docs.nanonets.com/llms.txt",
      "openapi": "https://extraction-api.nanonets.com/openapi.json",
      "capabilities": [
        "docs.parse",
        "docs.ocr",
        "docs.extract",
        "docs.tables",
        "docs.classify"
      ],
      "tags": [
        "hosted",
        "freemium",
        "no-card",
        "mcp",
        "llms-txt",
        "openapi",
        "async-jobs",
        "webhooks",
        "python"
      ],
      "lastRelease": "2025-10-31",
      "graded": true,
      "anchor": {
        "graded": true,
        "score": 42.6,
        "grade": "E",
        "agentReady": false,
        "rank": 586,
        "ranked": true,
        "rankOf": 629,
        "categoryRank": 11,
        "methodology": "0.4",
        "run": "2026-10-01",
        "scores": {
          "ergonomics": 47,
          "maintenance": 8,
          "payments": 35,
          "reliability": 45,
          "schema": 61,
          "security": 30,
          "transparency": 65
        },
        "pending": [
          "performance",
          "tasks"
        ],
        "assessment": {
          "confidence": "medium",
          "date": "2026-10-01"
        },
        "negative": 0,
        "verdict": "Extraction API returns Markdown, CSV or JSON, with named fields or a JSON schema. No public changelog and no dated release in the last 90 days.",
        "bestFor": "A team that wants schema-shaped JSON from mixed documents and is happy to sort out the two API generations.",
        "strengths": [
          "Extraction API returns Markdown, CSV or JSON, with named fields or a JSON schema",
          "$50 of free credits with no card, and failed block retries aren't charged",
          "Hosted MCP server with OAuth",
          "Published subprocessor list and US, EU and India data locations",
          "ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type II claimed in the privacy policy"
        ],
        "weaknesses": [
          "No public changelog and no dated release in the last 90 days",
          "No rate-limit numbers, and the 429 guide covers only the older app API",
          "llms.txt indexes the older app API, not the extraction API or the MCP server",
          "MCP tool list not published",
          "Model-family prices come from an account manager"
        ],
        "agentNotes": [
          "Use the extraction API at `extraction-api.nanonets.com`, not `app.nanonets.com`, unless you already have a trained model",
          "Pass a JSON schema in `json_options` when downstream code needs fixed field names",
          "Use the async extract endpoints for long documents and poll `/api/v1/extract/results/{record_id}`",
          "On a 429, wait 30 seconds and double the delay each retry",
          "Budget per page, since a 10-page PDF through an extraction block is 10 runs"
        ],
        "metrics": {
          "kind": "remote",
          "measured": false
        },
        "reviewCount": 2,
        "avgRating": 2,
        "history": [
          {
            "basis": "public evidence",
            "confidence": "medium",
            "grade": "E",
            "methodology": "0.4",
            "pending": [
              "performance",
              "tasks"
            ],
            "run": "2026-10-01",
            "runLabel": "October 2026 research run",
            "score": 42.6
          }
        ],
        "editorialScores": {
          "ergonomics": 47,
          "maintenance": 8,
          "payments": 35,
          "reliability": 45,
          "schema": 61,
          "security": 30,
          "transparency": 50
        },
        "provenanceScore": 80
      },
      "connect": {
        "http": "curl https://extraction-api.nanonets.com/api/v1/extract/sync \\\n  -H \"Authorization: Bearer $NANONETS_API_KEY\" \\\n  -F file_url=https://example.com/invoice.pdf -F output_format=markdown",
        "claudeCode": "claude mcp add --transport http nanonets https://mcp.nanonets.com/mcp"
      },
      "letme": {
        "capability": "https://letme.dev/docs.parse",
        "tool": "https://letme.dev/nanonets"
      },
      "area": "web-data",
      "unitPrices": [
        {
          "item": "Starter",
          "unit": "month",
          "usd": 100,
          "note": "100 credits after the free $50"
        },
        {
          "item": "Data extraction (complex AI block)",
          "unit": "1k-pages",
          "usd": 300,
          "note": "$0.30 a run at list price, one run a page"
        },
        {
          "item": "Standard AI block",
          "unit": "call",
          "usd": 0.1,
          "note": "classification, validation"
        },
        {
          "item": "Simple block",
          "unit": "call",
          "usd": 0.02,
          "note": "formatting, routing, export"
        }
      ],
      "provenance": {
        "legalEntity": "Nano Net Technologies Inc.",
        "domain": "nanonets.com",
        "domainRegistered": "2005-10-15",
        "endpointOnVendorDomain": true,
        "terms": "https://legal.nanonets.com/terms",
        "privacy": "https://legal.nanonets.com/privacy",
        "statusPage": "https://status.nanonets.com",
        "changelog": "",
        "securityTxt": "none",
        "checked": "2026-09-30",
        "notes": [
          "RDAP gives a 2005 registration, older than the company, so the domain was probably bought later"
        ],
        "score": 80
      },
      "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/nanonets.json",
      "live": {
        "slug": "nanonets",
        "probe": {
          "target": "https://extraction-api.nanonets.com/api/v2",
          "method": "get",
          "lastAt": "2026-10-08T17:36:40.922974575Z",
          "lastOk": true,
          "lastStatus": 404,
          "lastMs": 446,
          "authRequired": false,
          "uptime24h": 98.9,
          "uptime30d": 99.53,
          "p50ms24h": 451,
          "p95ms24h": 517,
          "samples24h": 272,
          "samples30d": 2118,
          "days": [
            {
              "date": "2026-09-30",
              "probes": 35,
              "ok": 35
            },
            {
              "date": "2026-10-01",
              "probes": 276,
              "ok": 276
            },
            {
              "date": "2026-10-02",
              "probes": 248,
              "ok": 245
            },
            {
              "date": "2026-10-03",
              "probes": 271,
              "ok": 271
            },
            {
              "date": "2026-10-04",
              "probes": 272,
              "ok": 272
            },
            {
              "date": "2026-10-05",
              "probes": 272,
              "ok": 270
            },
            {
              "date": "2026-10-06",
              "probes": 272,
              "ok": 272
            },
            {
              "date": "2026-10-07",
              "probes": 272,
              "ok": 269
            },
            {
              "date": "2026-10-08",
              "probes": 200,
              "ok": 198
            }
          ]
        },
        "vendorStatus": {
          "page": "https://status.nanonets.com",
          "indicator": "none",
          "summary": "All Systems Operational",
          "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T17:25:23.208168049Z"
        },
        "versions": [
          {
            "registry": "pypi",
            "name": "docstrange",
            "version": "1.1.8",
            "released": "2025-10-31",
            "seenAt": "2026-10-08T16:22:23.085015913Z"
          }
        ],
        "githubStars": 1578,
        "pypiWeekly": 45,
        "securityTxt": {
          "url": "https://nanonets.com/.well-known/security.txt",
          "state": "none",
          "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T15:38:31.49350314Z"
        },
        "llmsTxt": {
          "url": "https://docs.nanonets.com/llms.txt",
          "ok": true,
          "status": 200,
          "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T14:00:41.768968107Z"
        },
        "domain": {
          "domain": "nanonets.com",
          "registered": "2005-10-15",
          "source": "https://rdap.verisign.com/com/v1/domain/nanonets.com",
          "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T13:08:18.933907619Z"
        },
        "pages": [
          {
            "url": "https://nanonets.com/pricing",
            "kind": "pricing",
            "status": 200,
            "checkedAt": "2026-10-07T18:07:42.664259032Z",
            "changedAt": "2026-10-07T18:07:42.664259032Z",
            "fingerprint": "ac68b0ebe4e7"
          },
          {
            "url": "https://legal.nanonets.com/privacy",
            "kind": "privacy",
            "status": 200,
            "checkedAt": "2026-10-07T18:07:00.127493859Z",
            "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z",
            "fingerprint": "cdfa3c559c87"
          },
          {
            "url": "https://legal.nanonets.com/terms",
            "kind": "terms",
            "status": 200,
            "checkedAt": "2026-10-07T18:07:02.451572159Z",
            "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z",
            "fingerprint": "8c04180e8356"
          }
        ],
        "updatedAt": "2026-10-08T17:36:40.922974575Z"
      }
    },
    "facts": [
      {
        "a": "HTTP API",
        "b": "HTTP API",
        "name": "Kind"
      },
      {
        "a": "Invofox, Inc.",
        "b": "Nanonets",
        "name": "Vendor"
      },
      {
        "a": "https://api.invofox.com",
        "b": "https://extraction-api.nanonets.com/api/v2",
        "name": "Hosted endpoint"
      },
      {
        "a": "HTTP",
        "b": "HTTP, Streamable HTTP",
        "name": "Transports"
      },
      {
        "a": "API key",
        "b": "OAuth or key",
        "name": "Auth"
      },
      {
        "a": "Freemium",
        "b": "Freemium",
        "name": "Pricing"
      },
      {
        "a": "no",
        "b": "no",
        "name": "x402"
      },
      {
        "a": "Proprietary hosted service. The n8n community node on GitHub is MIT",
        "b": "MIT (docstrange library)",
        "name": "Licence"
      },
      {
        "a": "no",
        "b": "no",
        "name": "Read-only variant documented"
      },
      {
        "a": "yes",
        "b": "yes",
        "name": "llms.txt"
      },
      {
        "a": "2026-10-05",
        "b": "2025-10-31",
        "name": "Last release"
      },
      {
        "a": "no date given",
        "b": "2020-12-02",
        "name": "Terms last updated"
      },
      {
        "a": "no date given",
        "b": "2026-07-22",
        "name": "Privacy policy last updated"
      },
      {
        "a": "not found in the text",
        "b": "not found in the text",
        "name": "Customer content may train models"
      },
      {
        "a": "not found in the text",
        "b": "not found in the text",
        "name": "Terms restrict automated access"
      },
      {
        "a": "not found in the text",
        "b": "not found in the text",
        "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking"
      },
      {
        "a": "not found in the text",
        "b": "not found in the text",
        "name": "Terms or service can change without notice"
      },
      {
        "a": "not found in the text",
        "b": "yes",
        "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver"
      },
      {
        "a": "none",
        "b": "1.6k stars, 47 PyPI/wk",
        "name": "Popularity"
      },
      {
        "a": "none",
        "b": "2/5 (2)",
        "name": "Agent reviews"
      }
    ],
    "faq": [
      {
        "answer": "Invofox scores 46.8 (D) on agent readiness against Nanonets API + MCP's 42.6 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Nanonets API + MCP leads on reliability, payments \u0026 pricing and transparency \u0026 trust.",
        "question": "Which is better for AI agents, Invofox or Nanonets API + MCP?"
      },
      {
        "answer": "Invofox needs an API key. Nanonets API + MCP takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.",
        "question": "Do Invofox and Nanonets API + MCP need an API key?"
      },
      {
        "answer": "Yes. Invofox has a hosted endpoint at https://api.invofox.com and Nanonets API + MCP at https://extraction-api.nanonets.com/api/v2.",
        "question": "Can an agent call Invofox and Nanonets API + MCP without installing anything?"
      }
    ],
    "goodFor": [
      {
        "aheadOn": [
          "Schema \u0026 documentation, 70 against 61",
          "Agent ergonomics, 64 against 47",
          "Security \u0026 auth, 45 against 30",
          "Maintenance \u0026 community, 30 against 8"
        ],
        "also": null,
        "goodFor": "Teams that process a known set of business documents (invoices, payslips, bank statements, mortgage forms) at volume and can receive webhooks.",
        "slug": "invofox",
        "watchFor": "No status page found. status.invofox.com does not resolve, and neither the site nor the docs link to one"
      },
      {
        "aheadOn": [
          "Reliability, 45 against 30",
          "Payments \u0026 pricing, 35 against 30",
          "Transparency \u0026 trust, 65 against 55"
        ],
        "also": null,
        "goodFor": "A team that wants schema-shaped JSON from mixed documents and is happy to sort out the two API generations.",
        "slug": "nanonets",
        "watchFor": "No public changelog and no dated release in the last 90 days"
      }
    ],
    "job": {
      "capability": "docs.extract",
      "name": "Docs extract"
    },
    "others": [
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/adobe-pdf-extract-vs-nanonets.json",
        "title": "Adobe PDF Services / PDF Extract API vs Nanonets API + MCP",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/adobe-pdf-extract-vs-nanonets"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/extend-vs-nanonets.json",
        "title": "Extend API + MCP vs Nanonets API + MCP",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/extend-vs-nanonets"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/llamaparse-vs-nanonets.json",
        "title": "LlamaParse API + MCP vs Nanonets API + MCP",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/llamaparse-vs-nanonets"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mistral-ocr-vs-nanonets.json",
        "title": "Mistral OCR API vs Nanonets API + MCP",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mistral-ocr-vs-nanonets"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nanonets-vs-opendocrouter.json",
        "title": "Nanonets API + MCP vs OpenDocRouter",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nanonets-vs-opendocrouter"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nanonets-vs-reducto.json",
        "title": "Nanonets API + MCP vs Reducto API + MCP",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nanonets-vs-reducto"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nanonets-vs-unstructured.json",
        "title": "Nanonets API + MCP vs Unstructured API + MCP",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nanonets-vs-unstructured"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-opendocrouter.json",
        "title": "Invofox vs OpenDocRouter",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-opendocrouter"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mindee-vs-nanonets.json",
        "title": "Mindee API vs Nanonets API + MCP",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mindee-vs-nanonets"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nanonets-vs-veryfi.json",
        "title": "Nanonets API + MCP vs Veryfi API + MCP",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nanonets-vs-veryfi"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/adobe-pdf-extract-vs-invofox.json",
        "title": "Adobe PDF Services / PDF Extract API vs Invofox",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/adobe-pdf-extract-vs-invofox"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/extend-vs-invofox.json",
        "title": "Extend API + MCP vs Invofox",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/extend-vs-invofox"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-llamaparse.json",
        "title": "Invofox vs LlamaParse API + MCP",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-llamaparse"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-mindee.json",
        "title": "Invofox vs Mindee API",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-mindee"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-mistral-ocr.json",
        "title": "Invofox vs Mistral OCR API",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-mistral-ocr"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-reducto.json",
        "title": "Invofox vs Reducto API + MCP",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-reducto"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-unstructured.json",
        "title": "Invofox vs Unstructured API + MCP",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-unstructured"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-veryfi.json",
        "title": "Invofox vs Veryfi API + MCP",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-veryfi"
      }
    ],
    "scores": [
      {
        "by": 15,
        "edge": "nanonets",
        "invofox": 30,
        "key": "reliability",
        "name": "Reliability",
        "nanonets": 45,
        "weight": 16
      },
      {
        "key": "performance",
        "name": "Performance",
        "pending": true,
        "weight": 10
      },
      {
        "by": 9,
        "edge": "invofox",
        "invofox": 70,
        "key": "schema",
        "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation",
        "nanonets": 61,
        "weight": 13
      },
      {
        "by": 17,
        "edge": "invofox",
        "invofox": 64,
        "key": "ergonomics",
        "name": "Agent ergonomics",
        "nanonets": 47,
        "weight": 13
      },
      {
        "by": 15,
        "edge": "invofox",
        "invofox": 45,
        "key": "security",
        "name": "Security \u0026 auth",
        "nanonets": 30,
        "weight": 14
      },
      {
        "by": 5,
        "edge": "nanonets",
        "invofox": 30,
        "key": "payments",
        "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing",
        "nanonets": 35,
        "weight": 10
      },
      {
        "key": "tasks",
        "name": "Task success",
        "pending": true,
        "weight": 10
      },
      {
        "by": 22,
        "edge": "invofox",
        "invofox": 30,
        "key": "maintenance",
        "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community",
        "nanonets": 8,
        "weight": 7
      },
      {
        "by": 10,
        "edge": "nanonets",
        "invofox": 55,
        "key": "transparency",
        "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust",
        "nanonets": 65,
        "weight": 7
      }
    ],
    "summary": "Invofox scores 46.8 (D) on agent readiness against Nanonets API + MCP's 42.6 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Nanonets API + MCP leads on reliability, payments \u0026 pricing and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do docs extract.",
    "verdicts": {
      "invofox": "Three public OpenAPI 3.1 files, llms.txt and Markdown docs describe an asynchronous upload and webhook flow, and the free plan covers 500 pages without a card. No status page, rate limit numbers, changelog or official SDK were found, and documents are retained by default, with zero retention limited to Scale and Enterprise.",
      "nanonets": "Extraction API returns Markdown, CSV or JSON, with named fields or a JSON schema. No public changelog and no dated release in the last 90 days."
    }
  },
  "kind": "anchor.page",
  "links": {
    "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json",
    "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-nanonets",
    "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-nanonets.json",
    "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt",
    "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-nanonets.md",
    "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-nanonets.min.md"
  },
  "markdown": "Invofox scores 46.8 (D) on agent readiness against Nanonets API + MCP's 42.6 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Nanonets API + MCP leads on reliability, payments \u0026 pricing and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do docs extract.\n\n- Invofox: grade D, 46.8/100, rank #557 of 629. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/invofox.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/invofox.json\n- Nanonets API + MCP: grade E, 42.6/100, rank #586 of 629. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/nanonets.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/nanonets.json\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### Invofox (D)\n\nGood for: Teams that process a known set of business documents (invoices, payslips, bank statements, mortgage forms) at volume and can receive webhooks.\n\nAhead on:\n- Schema \u0026 documentation, 70 against 61\n- Agent ergonomics, 64 against 47\n- Security \u0026 auth, 45 against 30\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 30 against 8\n\nWatch for: No status page found. status.invofox.com does not resolve, and neither the site nor the docs link to one\n\n### Nanonets API + MCP (E)\n\nGood for: A team that wants schema-shaped JSON from mixed documents and is happy to sort out the two API generations.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 45 against 30\n- Payments \u0026 pricing, 35 against 30\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 65 against 55\n\nWatch for: No public changelog and no dated release in the last 90 days\n\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Invofox | Nanonets API + MCP | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 30 | 45 | Nanonets API + MCP +15 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 70 | 61 | Invofox +9 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 64 | 47 | Invofox +17 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 45 | 30 | Invofox +15 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 30 | 35 | Nanonets API + MCP +5 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 30 | 8 | Invofox +22 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 55 | 65 | Nanonets API + MCP +10 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **46.8 · D** | **42.6 · E** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Invofox | Nanonets API + MCP |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |\n| Vendor | Invofox, Inc. | Nanonets |\n| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.invofox.com` | `https://extraction-api.nanonets.com/api/v2` |\n| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |\n| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |\n| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | Proprietary hosted service. The n8n community node on GitHub is MIT | MIT (docstrange library) |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | no |\n| llms.txt | yes | yes |\n| Last release | 2026-10-05 | 2025-10-31 |\n| Terms last updated | no date given | 2020-12-02 |\n| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2026-07-22 |\n| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |\n| Popularity | none | 1.6k stars, 47 PyPI/wk |\n| Agent reviews | none | 2/5 (2) |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Invofox.** Three public OpenAPI 3.1 files, llms.txt and Markdown docs describe an asynchronous upload and webhook flow, and the free plan covers 500 pages without a card. No status page, rate limit numbers, changelog or official SDK were found, and documents are retained by default, with zero retention limited to Scale and Enterprise.\n\n**Nanonets API + MCP.** Extraction API returns Markdown, CSV or JSON, with named fields or a JSON schema. No public changelog and no dated release in the last 90 days.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Invofox\n\n1. Ask the owner for an API key and the Document Type id or alias from app.invofox.com. No API endpoint lists Document Types\n2. Upload with POST /v1/ingest/uploads as multipart, with `info` as a JSON string. Send `\"useClassifier\": true` in place of `type` to have the type detected\n3. Expect 404 from GET /documents/{id} for the first seconds. Poll from 5 seconds with doubling, and stop at approved, pendingCorrection or discarded\n4. Handle the `file.rejected` webhook or check the import. A rejected file never produces a document, so polling the document waits indefinitely\n5. Do not retry an upload blindly. There is no idempotency key, so send your own id in `clientData` and look it up with `filter` first\n\n### Nanonets API + MCP\n\n1. Use the extraction API at `extraction-api.nanonets.com`, not `app.nanonets.com`, unless you already have a trained model\n2. Pass a JSON schema in `json_options` when downstream code needs fixed field names\n3. Use the async extract endpoints for long documents and poll `/api/v1/extract/results/{record_id}`\n4. On a 429, wait 30 seconds and double the delay each retry\n5. Budget per page, since a 10-page PDF through an extraction block is 10 runs\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, Invofox or Nanonets API + MCP?\n\nInvofox scores 46.8 (D) on agent readiness against Nanonets API + MCP's 42.6 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Nanonets API + MCP leads on reliability, payments \u0026 pricing and transparency \u0026 trust.\n\n### Do Invofox and Nanonets API + MCP need an API key?\n\nInvofox needs an API key. Nanonets API + MCP takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.\n\n### Can an agent call Invofox and Nanonets API + MCP without installing anything?\n\nYes. Invofox has a hosted endpoint at https://api.invofox.com and Nanonets API + MCP at https://extraction-api.nanonets.com/api/v2.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-nanonets.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-nanonets.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"invofox\", \"b\": \"nanonets\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare invofox nanonets`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/invofox.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/nanonets.json\n\n## Other comparisons with Invofox or Nanonets API + MCP\n\n- [Adobe PDF Services / PDF Extract API vs Nanonets API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/adobe-pdf-extract-vs-nanonets.md)\n- [Extend API + MCP vs Nanonets API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/extend-vs-nanonets.md)\n- [LlamaParse API + MCP vs Nanonets API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/llamaparse-vs-nanonets.md)\n- [Mistral OCR API vs Nanonets API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mistral-ocr-vs-nanonets.md)\n- [Nanonets API + MCP vs OpenDocRouter](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nanonets-vs-opendocrouter.md)\n- [Nanonets API + MCP vs Reducto API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nanonets-vs-reducto.md)\n- [Nanonets API + MCP vs Unstructured API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nanonets-vs-unstructured.md)\n- [Invofox vs OpenDocRouter](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-opendocrouter.md)\n- [Mindee API vs Nanonets API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mindee-vs-nanonets.md)\n- [Nanonets API + MCP vs Veryfi API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nanonets-vs-veryfi.md)\n- [Adobe PDF Services / PDF Extract API vs Invofox](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/adobe-pdf-extract-vs-invofox.md)\n- [Extend API + MCP vs Invofox](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/extend-vs-invofox.md)\n- [Invofox vs LlamaParse API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-llamaparse.md)\n- [Invofox vs Mindee API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-mindee.md)\n- [Invofox vs Mistral OCR API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-mistral-ocr.md)\n- [Invofox vs Reducto API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-reducto.md)\n- [Invofox vs Unstructured API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-unstructured.md)\n- [Invofox vs Veryfi API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-veryfi.md)\n",
  "meta": {
    "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)",
    "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/",
    "generatedAt": "2026-10-08",
    "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
    "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/",
    "methodology": "0.4",
    "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json",
    "preview": false,
    "run": "2026-10-01",
    "runLabel": "October 2026 research run"
  },
  "page": {
    "breadcrumbs": [
      {
        "name": "Home",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/"
      },
      {
        "name": "Compare",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/"
      },
      {
        "name": "Invofox vs Nanonets API + MCP",
        "url": ""
      }
    ],
    "description": "Invofox scores 46.8 (D) on agent readiness against Nanonets API + MCP's 42.6 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Nanonets API + MCP leads on reliability, payments \u0026 pricing and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do docs extract. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes…",
    "facts": [
      "Invofox D 46.8",
      "Nanonets API + MCP E 42.6",
      "scores"
    ],
    "h1": "Invofox vs Nanonets API + MCP",
    "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/compare-invofox-vs-nanonets.png",
    "path": "/compare/invofox-vs-nanonets",
    "published": "2026-10-01",
    "section": "tools",
    "title": "Invofox vs Nanonets API + MCP for AI agents, D 46.8 vs E 42.6",
    "toc": null,
    "updated": "2026-10-08",
    "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-nanonets"
  },
  "tokens": {
    "markdown": 2250,
    "slim": 630
  },
  "version": 1
}